|
China (includes
Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau)
Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2004
Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and
Labor
February 28, 2005
The People's Republic of China (PRC) is an
authoritarian state in which, as specified in its
Constitution, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP or
Party) is the paramount source of power. Party members
hold almost all top government, police, and military
positions. Ultimate authority rests with the 24-member
political bureau (Politburo) of the CCP and its
9-member standing committee. Leaders made a top
priority of maintaining stability and social order and
were committed to perpetuating the rule of the CCP.
Citizens lacked the freedom to express opposition to
the Party-led political system and the right to change
their national leaders or form of government.
Socialism continued to provide the theoretical
underpinning of national politics, but Marxist
economic planning has given way to pragmatism, and
economic decentralization has increased the authority
of local officials. The Party's authority rested
primarily on the Government's ability to maintain
social stability; appeals to nationalism and
patriotism; Party control of personnel, media, and the
security apparatus; and continued improvement in the
living standards of most of the country's 1.3 billion
citizens. The Constitution provides for an independent
judiciary; however, in practice, the Government and
the CCP, at both the central and local levels,
frequently interfered in the judicial process and
directed verdicts in many cases.
The security apparatus is made up of the Ministries of
State Security and Public Security, the People's Armed
Police, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), and the
state judicial, procuratorial, and penal systems.
Civilian authorities generally maintained effective
control of the security forces. Security policy and
personnel were responsible for numerous human rights
abuses.
The country's transition from a centrally planned
economy toward a market based economy continued.
Although state-owned industry remained dominant in key
sectors, the Government has taken steps to restructure
major state-owned enterprises (SOEs), privatized many
small and medium SOEs, and allowed private
entrepreneurs increasing scope for economic activity.
Rising urban living standards; a burgeoning middle
class; greater independence for entrepreneurs; the
reform of the public sector, including government
efforts to increase transparency and eliminate
administrative hurdles; and expansion of the private
sector, including foreign-invested enterprises,
continued to increase workers' employment options and
reduce state control over citizens' daily lives.
The country faced many economic challenges, including
reform of SOEs and the banking system, growing
unemployment and underemployment, an aging population,
the need to construct an effective social safety net,
and rapidly widening income gaps between coastal and
interior regions and between urban and rural areas. In
recent years, between 100 and 150 million persons
voluntarily left rural areas to search for better jobs
and living conditions in cities, where they were often
denied access to government-provided economic and
social benefits, including education and health care.
The Government continued to relax controls over
migration from rural to urban areas, and many cities
took steps to expand the rights of migrants and their
dependents to basic social services. In the industrial
sector, continued downsizing of SOEs contributed to
rising urban unemployment that was widely believed to
be much higher than the officially estimated 4 percent,
with many sources estimating the actual figure to be
as high as 20 percent. The Government reported that
urban per capita disposable income in 2003 was $1,028
and grew by 9 percent over the previous year, while
rural per capita cash income was $317 and grew by 4
percent. Official estimates of the percentage of
citizens living in absolute poverty showed little
change from the previous year. The Government
estimated that 30 million persons lived in poverty,
and the World Bank estimated the number whose income
does not exceed one dollar per day to be 100 to 150
million persons.
The Government's human rights record remained poor,
and the Government continued to commit numerous and
serious abuses. Citizens did not have the right to
change their government, and many who openly expressed
dissenting political views were harassed, detained, or
imprisoned, particularly in a campaign late in the
year against writers, religious activists, dissidents,
and petitioners to the Central Government. Authorities
were quick to suppress religious, political, and
social groups that they perceived as threatening to
government authority or national stability, especially
before sensitive dates such as the 15th anniversary of
the 1989 Tiananmen massacre and other significant
political and religious occasions. However, the
Constitution was amended to mention human rights for
the first time.
Abuses included instances of extrajudicial killings;
torture and mistreatment of prisoners, leading to
numerous deaths in custody; coerced confessions;
arbitrary arrest and detention; and incommunicado
detention. The judiciary was not independent, and the
lack of due process remained a serious problem. The
lack of due process was particularly egregious in
death penalty cases, and the accused was often denied
a meaningful appeal. Executions often took place on
the day of conviction or on the denial of an appeal.
In Xinjiang, trials and executions of Uighurs charged
with separatism continued. Government pressure
continued to make it difficult for lawyers to
represent criminal defendants. The authorities
routinely violated legal protections in the cases of
political dissidents and religious figures. They
generally attached higher priority to suppressing
political opposition and maintaining public order than
to enforcing legal norms or protecting individual
rights. According to 2003 government statistics, more
than 250,000 persons were serving sentences in "reeducation-through-labor"
camps and other forms of administrative detention not
subject to judicial review. Other experts reported
that more than 310,000 persons were serving sentences
in these camps in 2003.
Throughout the year, the Government prosecuted
individuals for subversion and leaking state secrets
as a means to harass and intimidate, while others were
detained for relaying facts about Chinese human rights
issues to those outside the country. Among those
detained or convicted on such charges were Christian
activists Zhang Rongliang, Liu Fenggang, Xu Yonghai
and Zhang Shengqi, and journalists Zhao Yan, Shi Tao,
Li Guozhu and members of the independent PEN Center's
China branch. The Government detained individuals
administratively to suppress dissent and intimidate
others. In April and June, authorities detained many
who planned 15th anniversary commemorations of the
1989 Tiananmen massacre, including activist Hu Jia and
"Tiananmen Mothers" organization founders. Similarly,
military officials detained Dr. Jiang Yanyong because
he wrote to government leaders requesting an official
reassessment of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre.
The number of individuals serving sentences for the
now-repealed crime of counterrevolution was estimated
at 500 to 600; many of these persons were imprisoned
for the nonviolent expression of their political views.
Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) estimated that as
many as 250 persons remained in prison for political
activities connected to the 1989 Tiananmen
demonstrations.
The authorities granted early release from prison to
Tibetan nun Phuntsog Nyidrol in February and China
Democracy Party (CDP) co-founder Wang Youcai in March.
Counterrevolutionary prisoners Liu Jingsheng and Chen
Gang were also released during the year, after their
sentences were reduced. However, many political
prisoners, including Internet activists Xu Wei, Yang
Zili, and Huang Qi; Uighurs Rebiya Kadeer and Tohti
Tunyaz; journalists Zhao Yan and Jiang Weiping; labor
activists Yao Fuxin and Xiao Yunliang; civil activist
Mao Hengfeng; Catholic Bishop Su Zhimin; Christian
activists Zhang Rongliang, Zhang Yinan, Liu Fenggang,
and Xu Yonghai; Tibetans Jigme Gyatso, Tenzin Deleg,
and Gendun Choekyi Nyima; Inner Mongolian cultural
activist Hada; CDP co-founder Qin Yongmin; and
political dissident Yang Jianli remained imprisoned or
under other forms of detention, some in undisclosed
locations.
The Government used the international war on terror as
a pretext for cracking down harshly on suspected
Uighur separatists expressing peaceful political
dissent and on independent Muslim religious leaders.
The human rights situation in the Tibet Autonomous
Region (TAR) and in some Tibetan regions outside the
TAR also remained poor (see Tibet Addendum).
The Government maintained tight restrictions on
freedom of speech and of the press, and a wave of
detentions late in the year signaled a new campaign
targeting prominent writers and political commentators.
The Government regulated the establishment and
management of publications, controlled broadcast and
other electronic media, censored some foreign
television broadcasts, and jammed some radio signals
from abroad. During the year, publications were closed
and otherwise disciplined for publishing material
deemed objectionable by the Government, and
journalists, authors, academics, Internet writers, and
researchers were harassed, detained, and arrested by
the authorities. Although the scope of permissible
private speech has continued to expand in recent years,
the Government continued and intensified efforts to
monitor and control use of the Internet and other
wireless technology, including cellular phones, pagers,
and instant messaging devices. During the year, the
Government blocked many websites, began monitoring
text messages sent by mobile phones, and pressured
Internet companies to censor objectionable content.
NGOs reported that 43 journalists were imprisoned at
year's end.
The Government severely restricted freedom of assembly
and association and infringed on individuals' rights
to privacy. The authorities harassed and abused many
who raised public grievances, including petitioners to
the Central Government. The Government outlawed public
commemoration of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre.
Thousands of individuals protesting forced evictions
and workplace and health issues were detained during
the year. Petitioner issues were increasingly
considered suspect by the Government, and petitioner
leader Ye Guozhu was arrested in August while seeking
permission to hold a 10,000-person rally against
forced eviction.
While the number of religious believers in the country
continued to grow, the Government's record on respect
for religious freedom remained poor, and repression of
members of unregistered religious groups increased in
some parts of the country. Members of unregistered
Protestant and Catholic congregations, Muslim Uighurs,
and Tibetan Buddhists, including those residing within
the TAR (see Tibet Addendum) experienced ongoing and,
in some cases, increased official interference,
harassment, and repression. Government officials
increased vigilance against "foreign infiltration
under the guise of religion." The Government detained
and prosecuted a number of underground religious
figures in both the Protestant and Catholic Church.
Among them, Protestants Liu Fengang, Xu Yonghai, and
Zhang Shengqi were sentenced for sending to overseas
organizations information that the Government
considered sensitive.
The extent of religious freedom varied significantly
from place to place. The Government continued to
enforce regulations requiring all places of religious
activity to register with the Government. Many
provincial authorities required groups seeking to
register to come under the supervision of official, "patriotic"
religious organizations. Religious worship in many
officially registered churches, temples, and mosques
occurred without interference, but unregistered
churches in some areas were destroyed, religious
services were broken up, and church leaders and
adherents were harassed, detained, or beaten. At
year's end, scores of religious adherents remained in
prison because of their religious activities. No
visible progress was made in normalizing relations
between the official Patriotic Catholic Church and
Papal authorities, although both the Government and
the Vatican stated that they were ready to resume
negotiations aimed at establishing diplomatic
relations. The Government continued its crackdown
against the Falun Gong spiritual movement, and tens of
thousands of practitioners remained incarcerated in
prisons, extrajudicial reeducation-through-labor camps,
and psychiatric facilities. Several hundred Falun Gong
adherents reportedly have died in detention due to
torture, abuse, and neglect since the crackdown on
Falun Gong began in 1999.
Freedom of movement continued to be restricted.
However, the Government continued to relax its
residence-based registration requirements. The
Government denied the U.N. High Commissioner for
Refugees (UNHCR) permission to operate along its
border with North Korea and deported several thousand
North Koreans, many of whom faced persecution and some
of whom may have been executed upon their return, as
provided in North Korean law. Abuse and detention of
North Koreans in the country was also reported.
The Government did not permit independent domestic
NGOs to monitor human rights conditions. However, in
September, the U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary
Detention visited Beijing, Sichuan, and the TAR and
toured 10 detention facilities. Although the
Government extended invitations to the U.N. Special
Rapporteur for Torture and the U.N. Special Rapporteur
for Religious Intolerance, those visits did not occur
by year's end. The Government also extended an
invitation to the leaders of the U.S. Commission on
International Religious Freedom, but the visit did not
occur due to restrictive conditions that the
Government placed on the visit. In December, the
Government postponed a planned seminar by the
Organization for Economic Cooperation on Socially
Responsible Investment, which resulted in the
cancellation of a visit by the OECD's Trade Union
Advisory Council to discuss labor issues.
Violence against women, including imposition of a
coercive birth limitation policy that resulted in
instances of forced abortion and forced sterilization,
continued to be a problem, as did prostitution.
Discrimination against women, persons with
disabilities, and minorities persisted. Trafficking in
persons continued to be a serious problem.
Labor demonstrations, particularly those protesting
nonpayment of back wages, continued. Workplace safety
remained a serious problem, particularly in the mining
industry. The Government continued to deny
internationally recognized worker rights, including
freedom of association. Forced labor in prison
facilities remained a serious problem.
Significant legal reforms continued during the year,
including a Constitutional amendment specifically to
include protection of citizens' human rights and
legally obtained private property for the first time.
In July, the Government enacted the Administrative
Procedures Law, which prohibits government agencies
from violating citizens' rights or seizing property
without clear legal authority. A new infectious
disease law was enacted prohibiting discrimination
against people with HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis B, and
employment discrimination against those with HIV/AIDS
and Hepatitis B was outlawed. Treatment of some
migrant workers was improved in many major cities
through the passage of laws intended to guarantee
migrant children access to public education and to
protect migrant workers' rights to receive their
salary on a regular basis. The Government enacted
reforms related to interrogation of detainees,
fighting corruption, procedures for requisitioning
land, confiscation of personal property, extending
social security, regulating religion, and providing
legal aid. At year's end, it remained unclear how
widely these reforms would be implemented and what
effect they would have.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person,
Including Freedom From:
a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life
During the year, politically motivated and other
arbitrary and unlawful killings occurred. While no
official statistics on deaths in custody were
available, state-run media reported that 460 people
were killed by law enforcement officials and over 100
seriously injured through abuse or dereliction of duty
in 2003. In August, the Sichuan Provincial
Procuratorate issued a report stating that, in the
first half of the year, 118 individuals in Sichuan
Province died and 10 were severely injured due to
malfeasance by police and prison officials. In June,
state-run media reported that in Guizhou Province
police beat Jiang Zongxiu to death after she was
detained administratively for distributing Bibles (see
Section 2.c.). In April, Gu Xianggao died in police
custody in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province. Public
security officials offered compensation to his family
in connection with his death. In these cases,
officials denied that the deaths occurred because of
police abuse, but others who viewed the bodies stated
that beatings had occurred (see Sections 1.c. and
1.d.).
Several hundred Falun Gong adherents reportedly have
died in detention due to torture, abuse, and neglect
since the crackdown on Falun Gong began in 1999 (see
Section 2.c). Some groups based abroad estimated that
as many as 2,000 Falun Gong practictioners have died
as a result of official persecution.
Trials involving capital offenses sometimes took place
under circumstances involving severe lack of due
process and with no meaningful appeal. Executions
often took place on the day of conviction or appeal.
For example, on international antidrug day, June 26,
dozens of prisoners were executed, many within hours
of their trial and conviction. In Xinjiang, executions
of Uighurs accused by authorities of separatism, which
some observers claimed were politically motivated,
were reported (see Section 5). The Government regarded
the number of death sentences it carried out as a
state secret. However, in March, a National People's
Congress deputy asserted that nearly 10,000 cases per
year "result in immediate execution." The statement
sparked calls for reform, including returning the
power to issue death sentences from provincial courts
to the Supreme People's Court (SPC) and eliminating
the death penalty for economic and other nonviolent
crimes. Nonetheless, media reports stated that
approximately 10 percent of executions were for
economic crimes, especially corruption. SPC and
Ministry of Justice officials stated that the 10,000
executions per year figure is exaggerated. Amnesty
International (AI) reported that China executed more
persons than any other country. Some foreign academics
estimated that as many as 10,000 to 20,000 persons are
executed each year.
b. Disappearance
The Government used incommunicado detention. The law
requires notification of family members within 24
hours of detention, but many individuals were held
without notification for significantly longer periods,
especially in sensitive political cases. Dr. Jiang
Yanyong and his wife were detained on June 1 and held
incommunicado for several weeks in connection with a
letter he wrote to government leaders about the 1989
Tiananmen massacre (see Section 2.d.). New York Times
researcher Zhao Yan also was held for several days in
September before authorities notified his relatives
and employer (see Section 2.a.).
By year's end, the Government had not provided a
comprehensive, credible accounting of all those
missing or detained in connection with the suppression
of the 1989 Tiananmen demonstrations. Public calls for
a reassessment of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre
increased during the year, especially around the 15th
anniversary of the crackdown.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment
The Prison Law forbids prison guards from extorting
confessions by torture, insulting prisoners' dignity,
and beating or encouraging others to beat prisoners;
however, police and other elements of the security
apparatus employed torture and degrading treatment in
dealing with some detainees and prisoners. While
senior officials acknowledged that torture and coerced
confessions were chronic problems, they did not take
sufficient measures to end these practices. Former
detainees reported credibly that officials used
electric shocks, prolonged periods of solitary
confinement, incommunicado detention, beatings,
shackles, and other forms of abuse.
Since the crackdown on Falun Gong began in 1999,
several hundred Falun Gong adherents reportedly died
in custody due to torture, abuse, and neglect (see
Section 2.c.). During the year, the Government
arrested Falun Gong members and formally charged them
with manufacturing claims that they were tortured.
During the year, police continued to use torture to
coerce confessions from criminal suspects. A Supreme
People's Procuratorate (SPP) investigation uncovered
more than 4,000 cases of official abuse, including
torture and extracting confessions through coercion,
from 2001 to 2003. Lawyers and other observers
continued to point to the December 2003 conviction and
execution of crime syndicate figure Liu Yong on
corruption charges as a prominent example of the
Government ignoring evidence of torture in the
interest of fighting crime. Liu was sentenced to death
in 2002, but Beijing-based defense attorneys
discovered evidence that a key witness’ confession was
coerced through torture. As a result, the Liaoning
High Court overturned Liu's death sentence in August
2003. Yielding to public opposition to the ruling, the
SPC reinstated the death penalty in December 2003, and
Liu was executed the same day.
Mao Hengfeng, a Shanghai housing activist and
organizer sentenced to reeducation through labor for
staging "disorderly visits" to Government offices,
reportedly suffered various forms of torture. She
reportedly was held with drug addicts who were allowed
to abuse her, was strapped to her bed for hours at
time, was force-fed an unidentified medicine that
turned her mouth black, and, on one occasion, had her
limbs pulled in different directions for a period of 2
days.
The Government made some efforts to address the
problem of torture during the year. Some provincial
governments issued regulations stipulating that judges
and police who used torture to extract confessions
from suspects would face dismissal. In May, the SPP
announced a 1-year campaign to punish officials who
infringed on human rights, including officials who
coerced confessions through torture or illegally
detained or mistreated prisoners. In August, the
Government issued new regulations governing the length
and conditions of interrogation for pretrial detainees,
including protections for pregnant women, juveniles,
and the elderly. Police officers who tortured suspects
faced dismissal and criminal prosecution in some cases.
For example, in June two police officers in Bazhou,
Hebei Province, were sentenced to life in prison and a
suspended death sentence after torturing a suspect to
death and hiding the body in 2001. In July, two
Sichuan Province police officers were sentenced to 12
years and 1 year in prison, respectively, in another
case in which a suspect died after being tortured.
During the year, there were reports of persons,
including Falun Gong adherents, sentenced to
psychiatric hospitals for expressing their political
or religious beliefs (see Section 1.d.). Some
reportedly were forced to undergo electric shock
treatments.
Petitioners and other activists sentenced to
administrative detention also reported being tortured.
Such reports included being strapped to beds or other
devices for days at a time, being beaten, being
forcibly injected or fed medications, and being denied
food and use of toilet facilities.
The Ministry of Justice administered more than 670
prisons with a population of over 1.5 million inmates,
according to official statistics. In addition, 33
jails for juveniles housed over 19,000 juvenile
offenders. The country also operated hundreds of
administrative detention centers, which were run by
security ministries and administered separately from
the Ministry of Justice and the formal court system (see
Section 2.d.)
Conditions in penal institutions for both political
prisoners and common criminals generally were harsh
and frequently degrading. Prisoners and detainees
often were kept in overcrowded conditions with poor
sanitation. Prison capacity became an increasing
problem in some areas, including Guangdong Province.
Food often was inadequate and of poor quality, and
many detainees relied on supplemental food and
medicines provided by relatives. Some prominent
dissidents were not allowed to receive supplemental
food and medicine from relatives. Political prisoners
often were kept segregated from each other and placed
with common criminals, who sometimes beat political
prisoners at the instigation of guards. Xu Guang, a
former CDP member released from prison in September,
stated that he was beaten and placed in a metal cage
for 2 months after he commemorated the anniversary of
the 1989 Tiananmen massacre while in Qiaoci Prison in
Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province. Newly arrived prisoners
or those who refused to acknowledge committing crimes
were particularly vulnerable to being beaten in prison.
In January, political dissident He Depu was reportedly
beaten by guards at Beijing No. 2 Prison and made deaf
in one ear. Authorities acknowledged He's deafness,
but asserted that he was already deaf when he entered
prison, a claim denied by his family members.
Prolonged use of electric shocks and use of a
rack-like disciplinary bed were reported at Inner
Mongolia's Chifeng Prison. Inner Mongolian cultural
activist Hada was among those tortured, according to
credible NGO reports. Chinese prison management relied
on the labor of prisoners both as an element of
punishment and to fund prison operations (see Section
6.c.).
Adequate, timely medical care for prisoners continued
to be a serious problem, despite official assurances
that prisoners have the right to prompt medical
treatment if they become ill. In August, businessman
Wu Daiyou died in a Chongqing prison. His family
claimed he contracted tuberculosis in prison and died
because authorities denied him needed medical
treatment. Political prisoners continued to have
difficulties obtaining medical treatment, despite
repeated appeals on their behalf by their families and
the international community. Foreign citizen Jude Shao
suffered a serious heart ailment in a Shanghai prison
that authorities were unable to treat. Foreign legal
residents Yang Jianli and Wang Bingzhang suffered
strokes in prison, but authorities rejected their
requests for outside medical care. Others with health
concerns included Uighur businesswoman Rebiya Kadeer;
democracy activists Qin Yongmin, Hua Di, and He Depu;
Internet writers Yang Zili and Luo Yongzhang; labor
activists Xiao Yunliang, Yao Fuxin, Hu Shigen, and
Zhang Shanguang; civil activist Mao Hengfeng; Inner
Mongolian activist Hada; and religious prisoners Zhang
Rongliang, Liu Fenggang, Xu Yonghai, Gong Shengliang,
Chen Jingmao, and Bishop Su Zhimin. During the year,
some political prisoners went on hunger strikes in
prison to protest their treatment.
Special prisons to segregate HIV-positive prisoners
and provide care to those with HIV/AIDS were
established during the year, including facilities in
Henan and Zhejiang Provinces. In July, supporters of a
Shangqiu, Henan Province AIDS orphanage and school,
which the Government claimed was operating illegally,
were detained for contesting the closure of the
institution. Wang Guofeng and Li Suzhi, who have HIV,
claimed they received inadequate treatment while
detained and that authorities refused to provide them
with test results or allow them to travel to Beijing
to see specialists after they were released on bail.
The Government stated they were denied imported HIV
medications because such medicines likely were
smuggled into the country.
Acknowledging guilt was a precondition for receiving
certain privileges, including the ability to purchase
outside food, make telephone calls, and receive family
visits. Prison officials often denied privileges to
those, including political prisoners, who refused to
acknowledge guilt or obey other prison rules. After
CCP activist Wang Bingzhang told jailers he intended
to stage a hunger strike, prison staff withheld prison
visits, letters, telephone privileges, and other
communication for 6 months as punishment. Foreign
Falun Gong member Charles Lee staged a hunger strike
to protest forced "reeducation" sessions he was given
in prison. Some prominent political prisoners, however,
received better than standard treatment.
Conditions in administrative detention facilities,
such as reeducation-through-labor camps, were similar
to those in prisons. Beating deaths occurred in
administrative detention. The March 2003 death of
university graduate Sun Zhigang in a
custody-and-repatriation camp designed to hold illegal
migrants focused public attention on abuses in the
administrative detention system. Under the
custody-and-repatriation system, police detained and
forcibly repatriated to their home provinces migrants,
petitioners, and political activists caught without an
identification card, work permit, or temporary
residence permit. Public outcry following Sun's death
played an important role in the State Council's
decision, in June 2003, to abolish the
custody-and-repatriation system and convert
custody-and-repatriation camps across the country into
voluntary humanitarian aid shelters for the homeless.
Initial reports indicated that most current residents
of the camps are indeed there voluntarily. In June, a
facility employee who urged inmates to beat Sun was
sentenced to death. During the year, one inmate was
given a suspended death sentence, and 17 others
received prison sentences in connection with Sun's
death.
Deaths in reeducation-through-labor camps led to calls
to reform or abolish that system as well. Reform of
the reeducation-through-labor law was placed on the
legislative agenda of the National People's Congress (NPC),
but no concrete steps were taken to enact a new law
during the year. Scholars publicly discussed reforms,
including introducing judicial oversight of
reeducation-through-labor sentences, allowing lawyers
to participate in hearings prior to reeduction
sentences, limiting the types of behavior punishable
by reeducation, establishing alternatives to
incarceration, and shortening the maximum term of
reeducation.
Sexual and physical abuse and extortion were reported
in some detention centers. Forced labor in prisons and
reeducation-through-labor camps was also common.
The Government generally did not permit independent
monitoring of prisons or reeducation-through-labor
camps, and prisoners remained inaccessible to most
international human rights organizations. However, the
Government hosted a visit by the U.N. Working Group on
Arbitrary Detention that included visits to 10
detention facilities in Beijing, Chengdu, and the TAR
(see Section 1.d.). The Government also agreed to
invite the U.N. Special Rapporteur for Torture, but
the visit stalled, in part because of the Government's
refusal to allow him to visit prisons without advance
notice (see Section 4). By year's end, the Government
had not announced any progress in talks with the
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) on an
agreement for ICRC access to prisons, although there
were several rounds of consultations between the ICRC
and the Government about allowing the ICRC to open an
office in Beijing. Monthly working level meetings
intended to renew cooperation on the U.S.-China Prison
Labor Memorandum of Understanding continued during the
year, and visits were conducted in July, September,
and December (see Section 6.c).
d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention
Arbitrary arrest and detention remained serious
problems. The law permits authorities, in some
circumstances, to detain persons without arresting or
charging them, and persons may be sentenced
administratively to up to 3 years in reeducation
through-labor camps and other administrative detention
facilities without a trial. Because the Government
tightly controlled information, it was impossible to
determine the total number of persons subjected to new
or continued arbitrary arrest or detention. According
to 2003 official government statistics, more than
250,000 persons were in reeducation-through-labor
camps. Other experts reported that more than 310,000
persons were serving sentences in these camps in 2003.
According to published reports of the Supreme People's
Procuratorate, the country's 340
reeducation-through-labor facilities had a total
capacity of about 300,000 people. In addition, special
administrative detention facilities existed for drug
offenders and prostitutes. In 2002, these facilities
held over 130,000 offenders, and the number reportedly
has increased. An additional form of administrative
detention for migrants and homeless persons, known as
custody and repatriation, was abolished in 2003 and
converted into a system of over 900 voluntary
humanitarian aid shelters (see Section 1.c.).
According to official statistics, those facilities had
served more than 670,000 people from August 1, 2003 to
November 30, 2004. The Government also confined some
Falun Gong adherents, petitioners, labor activists,
and others to psychiatric hospitals.
Approximately 500 to 600 individuals continued to
serve sentences for the now-repealed crime of
counterrevolution. Many of these persons were
imprisoned for the nonviolent expression of their
political views (see Section 1.e.).
The Ministry of Public Security (MPS) coordinates the
country's law enforcement, which is administratively
organized into local, county, provincial, and
specialized police agencies. Recent efforts have been
made to strengthen historically weak regulation and
management of law enforcement agencies; however,
judicial oversight is limited and checks and balances
are absent. Corruption at the local level was
widespread. Police officers reportedly coerced victims
of crimes, took individuals into custody without due
cause, arbitrarily collected fees from individuals
charged with crimes, and mentally and physically
abused victims and perpetrators. The SPP investigated
approximately 1,980 police officials for dereliction
of duty in the period from January to September. Among
them was a Hunan Province police official who was
sentenced to 6 months in prison for failing to
investigate the abduction and rape of a 9-year-old
girl. Public interest lawyers also sued police in a
Hunan Province village for failing to investigate the
murder of a young woman, allegedly committed by her
police officer boyfriend. Through September, the SPP
filed 938 corruption cases against 1,078 officials
working in prisons, jails, and other detention
facilities.
Extended, unlawful detention by security officials
remained a serious problem. The SPP reported that from
1998 through 2002 there were 308,182 persons detained
for periods longer than permitted by law. In 2003, the
Government initiated a campaign to resolve cases of
extended, unlawful detention. According to state
media, 7,064 criminal suspects endured extended
unlawful detention during the year (including some
whose detention was prolonged from 2003). Courts
reviewed and resolved 6,775 of those cases from
January to October 2004, leaving only 289 cases
unresolved, the Government stated. In March, the SPC
and SPP reported to the National People's Congress
that they had reviewed nearly 30,000 extended
detention cases in 2003, including many that dated
back several years, and resolved nearly all. In most
cases, those detained unlawfully were formally charged
or convicted, but a few, including Internet writer Liu
Di, were released. Procuratorates in Hainan and
Guizhou Provinces formally punished local police
officers who unlawfully extended a suspect's term in
custody.
According to the Criminal Procedure Law, police may
unilaterally detain a person for up to 37 days before
releasing him or formally placing him under arrest.
After a suspect is arrested, the law allows police and
prosecutors to detain him for up to 6 and one-half
months before trial while a case is being further
investigated. In practice, pretrial detention in some
cases lasted for a year or longer. Dissident Yang
Jianli was held without conviction for more than 2
years before his verdict and 5-year sentence on
espionage and illegal entry charges was announced in
May. Originally detained in April 2002, he was not
tried until August 2003. The U.N. Working Group on
Arbitrary Detention found that the country's pretrial
detention of Yang Jianli violated the Universal
Declaration on Human Rights and the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
The law stipulates that authorities must notify a
detainee's family or work unit of his detention within
24 hours. However, in practice, failure to provide
timely notification remained a serious problem,
particularly in sensitive political cases. Under a
sweeping exception, officials are not required to
provide notification if doing so would "hinder the
investigation" of a case. In some cases, police
treated those with no immediate family more severely.
Police continued to hold individuals without granting
access to family members or lawyers, and trials
continued to be conducted in secret. Detained criminal
suspects, defendants, their legal representatives, and
close relatives were entitled to apply for bail, but,
in practice, few suspects were released pending trial.
The Criminal Procedure Law does not address the
reeducation-through-labor system, which allows
non-judicial panels of police and local authorities,
called Labor Reeducation Committees, to sentence
persons to up to 3 years in prison-like facilities.
The committees can also extend an inmate's sentence
for an additional year. Defendants legally were
entitled to challenge reeducation-through-labor
sentences under the Administrative Litigation Law.
They could appeal for a reduction in, or suspension
of, their sentences; however, appeals rarely were
successful. Many other persons were detained in
similar forms of administrative detention, known as "custody
and education" (for example, for prostitutes and their
clients) and "custody and training" (for minors who
committed crimes). A special form of reeducation
center was used to detain Falun Gong practitioners who
had completed terms in reeducation through labor, but
whom authorities decided to detain further.
According to foreign researchers, the country had 20 "ankang"
institutions (high-security psychiatric hospitals for
the criminally insane) directly administered by the
Ministry of Public Security. Some dissidents,
persistent petitioners, and others were housed with
mentally ill patients in these institutions. "Patients"
in these hospitals were reportedly given medicine
against their will and forcibly subjected to electric
shock treatment. The regulations for committing a
person into an ankang facility were not clear.
Credible reports indicated that a number of political
and trade union activists, "underground" religious
believers, persons who repeatedly petitioned the
Government, members of the banned China Democratic
Party, and Falun Gong adherents were incarcerated in
such facilities during the year. These included Wang
Miaogen, Wang Chanhao, Pan Zhiming, and Li Da, who
were reportedly held in an ankang facility run by the
Shanghai Public Security Bureau. The Government
negotiated with the World Psychiatric Association to
resolve a motion pending in previous years that would
have expelled the country from the organization for
using psychiatric facilities to incarcerate political
prisoners, but a planned WPA visit to the country did
not take place.
Administrative detention was frequently used as a
vehicle to intimidate political activists and prevent
public demonstrations (see Section 2.b.). For example,
authorities detained several persons in the period
before the April "Qingming" memorial holiday as a
means to prevent public commemoration of the 1989
Tiananmen massacre. Tiananmen Mothers organization
co-founders Ding Zilin, Jiang Xianling, and Huang
Jinping were detained at separate locations in late
March. AIDS activist Hu Jia also was detained after he
stated his intention to commemorate the anniversary on
their behalf. All were released eventually, but some
were prevented from returning to Beijing until after
the holiday was over. On June 1, military officials
detained retired PLA doctor Jiang Yanyong, who in 2003
had helped focus international attention on the spread
of Severe Acquired Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in
Beijing, because he wrote to government leaders
requesting a reassessment of the 1989 Tiananmen
crackdown. The 72-year-old Jiang and his wife, Hua
Zhongwei, were interrogated in an undisclosed location.
Hua was released on June 15. Jiang was released
without charges on July 20, but he was forbidden to
speak with journalists or foreigners, and he remained
in a form of house arrest. Dr. Jiang also was
pressured not to leave the country to accept an award
(see Section 2.d.).
Arrests on charges of revealing state secrets,
subversion, and common crimes were used during the
year by authorities to suppress political dissent and
social advocacy. Citizens were detained and prosecuted
during the year under broad and ambiguous state
secrets laws for, among other actions, disclosing
information on criminal trials, meetings, and
government activity. The number of persons executed
each year has been deemed by the Government to be a
state secret. Information could retroactively be
classified a state secret by the Government. Dozens of
citizens writing on the Internet or engaging in
on-line chat about political topics were detained on
state secrets and subversion charges during the year (see
Section 2.a.). More than 100 intellectuals signed a
petition urging the Government to revise the
subversion law because its use in the prosecution of
Internet writer Du Daobin contradicted the
constitutional guarantee of free speech.
In September, the U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary
Detention visited detention facilities in Beijing,
Sichuan Province, and the TAR. Although satisfied with
its access, the Working Group noted that all four
recommendations from its 1997 visit to China still had
not been implemented and continued to be serious
problems. First, the law lacks a presumption of
innocence until proven guilty. Second, it fails to
define "endangering national security" so that overly
broad prosecutions can and do occur. Third, the law
includes no protection for those peacefully exercising
rights protected by the Universal Declaration of Human
Rights. Fourth, no "real judicial control" exists over
the reeducation-through-labor system. The Working
Group noted the Government's announced plan to adopt
legislation that would address deficiencies in
reeducation through labor and regulate the use of
psychiatric institutions in administrative detention.
Police sometimes harassed and detained relatives of
dissidents. Journalists also were detained or
threatened during the year, often when their reporting
met with the Government's or local authorities'
disapproval (see Section 2.a.). For example, New York
Times researcher Zhao Yan was detained in September
shortly after the newspaper published an article
correctly predicting the resignation of Jiang Zemin as
chairman of the Central Military Commission. The
newspaper denied that Zhao had any involvement with
the story, and prosecutors did not disclose the basis
for the charges, citing state secrets laws (see
Section 2.a.). In December, farmers' advocate and
writer Li Boguang and three members of the independent
PEN Center promoting writers' freedoms were among
those detained in what appeared to be a campaign
targeting writers (see Section 2.a.). Local
authorities used the Government's campaign against
cults to detain and arrest large numbers of religious
practitioners and members of spiritual groups,
including Christian leader Zhang Rongliang (see
Section 2.c.).
The campaign that began in 1998 against the China
Democracy Party (CDP), an opposition party, continued
during the year. Dozens of CDP leaders, activists, and
members have been arrested, detained, or confined as a
result of this campaign. Since December 1998, over 40
core leaders of the CDP have been given severe
punishments on subversion charges. Xu Wenli, Wang
Youcai, and Qin Yongmin were sentenced in 1998 to
prison terms of 13, 12, and 11 years, respectively. Xu
Wenli and Wang Youcai were released on medical parole
to the United States in December 2002 and March 2004,
respectively. Qin remained in prison at year’s end.
During the year, Sang Jiancheng was sentenced to a
3-year prison term in connection with an open letter
calling for political reform and a reappraisal of the
official verdict on the 1989 Tiananmen massacre signed
by 192 activists, including former CDP members, prior
to the 16th Party Congress in November 2002. Internet
writer Ouyang Yi, one of the signers of the open
letter, was released after serving a 2-year prison
sentence in December, but other signers of the letter
remained jailed.
Since the Government banned the Falun Gong spiritual
group in 1999, criminal proceedings involving accused
Falun Gong activists were held almost entirely outside
the formal court system. In December, a Beijing
attorney sent an open letter to the National People's
Congress highlighting issues of arbitrary detention
and unlawful process in cases involving Falun Gong.
The letter focused on the April detention and
subsequent administrative sentencing of his client,
Huang Wei of Shijiazhuang, Hebei Province, who was
released in 2002 from a 3-year reeducation sentence
for Falun Gong activities. On April 13, Huang was
detained again, his home was searched, and a security
official signed Huang's name on a confession,
according to the open letter. Huang was sentenced on
June 3 to three more years of reeducation in
connection with Falun Gong. When Huang tried to sue
the Government in protest, his attorney was denied
permission to see his client. According to the letter,
court and prison authorities told the attorney that
only the "610 Office" of the Ministry of Justice could
address Falun Gong matters. In the process, the letter
described how judges explained that courts are under
strict orders not to accept Falun Gong cases and that,
in such cases, the courts do not follow normal
pretrial procedures. The attorney's letter concluded
that such treatment of accused Falun Gong adherents
was unlawful.
The campaign against separatism in Xinjiang
specifically targeted the "three evils" of extremism,
splittism, and terrorism as the major threats to
Xinjiang's social stability. Because authorities in
Xinjiang regularly failed to distinguish carefully
among those involved in peaceful activities in support
of independence, "illegal" religious activities, and
violent terrorism, it was often difficult to determine
whether particular raids, detentions, arrests, or
judicial punishments targeted those seeking to worship,
those peacefully seeking political goals, or those
engaged in violence (see Section 5).
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The Constitution states that the courts shall, in
accordance with the law, exercise judicial power
independently, without interference from
administrative organs, social organizations, and
individuals. However, in practice, the judiciary was
not independent. It received policy guidance from both
the Government and the Party, whose leaders used a
variety of means to direct courts on verdicts and
sentences, particularly in politically sensitive cases.
At both the central and local levels, the Government
frequently interfered in the judicial system and
dictated court decisions. Trial judges decide
individual cases under the direction of the trial
committee in each court. In addition, the Communist
Party's Law and Politics Committee, which includes
representatives of the police, security, procuratorate,
and courts, has authority to review and influence
court operations at all levels of the judiciary; the
Committee, in some cases, altered decisions. People's
Congresses also had authority to alter court decisions,
but this happened rarely. Corruption and conflicts of
interest also affected judicial decision-making.
Judges were appointed by the People's Congresses at
the corresponding level of the judicial structure and
received their court finances and salaries from those
government bodies. This sometimes resulted in local
authorities exerting undue influence over the judges
they appointed and financed.
The Supreme People's Court (SPC) is the highest court,
followed in descending order by the higher,
intermediate, and basic people's courts. These courts
handle criminal, civil, and administrative cases,
including appeals of decisions by police and security
officials to use reeducation through labor and other
forms of administrative detention. There were special
courts for handling military, maritime, and railway
transport cases.
Corruption and inefficiency were serious problems in
the judiciary as in other areas (see Section 3).
Safeguards against corruption were vague and poorly
enforced.
In recent years, the Government has taken steps to
address systemic weaknesses in the judicial system and
to make the system more transparent and accountable to
public scrutiny. In 2003, the SPP prosecuted 9,720
officials involved in investigating, prosecuting, or
adjudicating criminal cases. In its March report to
the National People's Congress (NPC), the SPC reported
that 794 judges were investigated for corruption in
2003, and 52 faced criminal prosecution. SPC
regulations require all trials to be open to the
public, with certain exceptions, such as cases
involving state secrets, privacy, and minors. The
legal exception for cases involving state secrets was
used to keep politically sensitive proceedings closed
to the public and even to family members in some cases.
Under the regulations, "foreigners with valid
identification" are to be allowed the same access to
trials as citizens. As in past years, foreign
diplomats and journalists sought permission to attend
a number of trials only to have court officials
reclassify them as "state secrets" cases, thus closing
them to the public. Some trials were broadcast, and
court proceedings were a regular television feature. A
few courts published their verdicts on the Internet.
Citizens continued to use the court system to seek
legal redress against government malfeasance.
According to official statistics, 110,199
administrative lawsuits were filed against the
Government in 2002, slightly fewer than in the
previous year. Administrative actions were affirmed 18
percent of the time, transferred 23 percent of the
time, and dismissed or rejected 59 percent of the
time, according to those 2002 statistics. Decisions of
any kind in favor of dissidents remained rare.
Court officials continued efforts to enable the poor
to afford litigation by exempting, reducing, or
postponing court fees. During the year, new
regulations went into effect requiring law firms and
private attorneys to provide some legal aid. Criminal
and administrative cases remained eligible for legal
aid, although the vast majority of defendants still
went to trial without a lawyer. During the year,
courts waived over $128 million (RMB 1.057 billion) in
litigation costs. Legal aid to migrant workers
accounted for 137,656 cases; in most cases, migrant
workers sued for unpaid wages. State media claimed
that the number of attorneys in the country increased
to 102,000, but the supply of legal aid attorneys
remained inadequate to meet demand. For example, the
number of registered legal aid attorneys in Guangdong
Province dropped 25 percent in 2003, and no legal aid
agency existed in 45 counties in Guangxi Province.
Nonattorney legal advisors and government employees
provided the only legal aid options in many areas.
During the year, the conviction rate in criminal cases
remained over 95 percent. In 2003, 730,355 of the
747,096 persons (97.7 percent) whose criminal cases
were resolved at trial were found guilty and received
criminal punishment. Of this number 158,562 (21.2
percent) were sentenced to terms of imprisonment of 5
years or greater. In practice, criminal defendants
often were not assigned an attorney until a case was
brought to court. In many politically sensitive
trials, which rarely lasted more than several hours,
the courts handed down guilty verdicts immediately
following proceedings. Defendants who refused to
acknowledge guilt often received harsher sentences
than those who confessed. There was an appeals
process, but appeals rarely resulted in reversals.
Police and prosecutorial officials often ignored the
due process provisions of the law and of the
Constitution. The lack of due process was particularly
egregious in death penalty cases. There were over 60
capital offenses, including nonviolent financial
crimes such as counterfeiting currency, embezzlement,
and corruption. Executions were often carried out on
the date of conviction (see Section 1.a.). The SPC
reported that, in 2003, it reviewed 300 serious
criminal cases, including capital cases, and affirmed
182 of them. Tibetan Lobsang Dondrub was executed in
January 2003 for his alleged connection to a series of
bombings in 2002. His execution occurred despite
government assurances that he would be afforded full
due process and that the national-level Supreme
People’s Court would review his sentence (see Tibet
Addendum). The Government regarded the number of death
sentences it carried out as a state secret. Minors and
pregnant women were expressly exempt from the death
sentence, although AI reported that a few criminals
who were under age 18 at the time they committed an
offense were executed as a result of courts' failure
properly to determine their age. On March 8, Gao Pan
was allegedly executed for a murder committed in
August 2001, when he was not yet 18 years old.
The Criminal Procedure Law falls short of
international standards in many respects. For example,
it has insufficient safeguards against the use of
evidence gathered through illegal means, such as
torture, and it does not prevent extended pre- and
posttrial detention (see Sections 1.c. and 1.d.).
Appeals processes failed to provide sufficient avenue
for review, and there were inadequate remedies for
violations of defendants' rights. Furthermore, under
the law, there is no right to remain silent, no
protection against double jeopardy, and no law
governing the type of evidence that may be introduced.
The mechanism that allows defendants to confront their
accusers was inadequate; according to one expert, only
1 to 5 percent of trials involved witnesses.
Accordingly, most criminal "trials" consisted of the
procurator reading statements of witnesses whom
neither the defendant nor his lawyer ever had an
opportunity to question. Defense attorneys have no
authority to compel witnesses to testify. Anecdotal
evidence indicated that implementation of the Criminal
Procedure Law remained uneven and far from complete,
particularly in politically sensitive cases.
The Criminal Procedure Law gives most suspects the
right to seek legal counsel shortly after their
initial detention and interrogation; however, police
often used loopholes in the law to circumvent
defendants' right to seek counsel. Defendants in
politically sensitive cases frequently found it
difficult to find an attorney. In some sensitive
cases, lawyers had no pretrial access to their
clients, and defendants and lawyers were not allowed
to speak during trials. Even in nonsensitive trials,
criminal defense lawyers frequently had little access
to their clients or to evidence to be presented during
the trial. Defendants in only one of every seven
criminal cases had legal representation, according to
credible reports citing internal government
statistics. Government-employed lawyers often were
reluctant to represent defendants in politically
sensitive cases. The percentage of lawyers in the
criminal bar reportedly declined from 3 percent in
1997 to 1 percent in 2001.
Defense attorneys rarely entered not guilty pleas on
behalf of their clients, choosing instead to argue
only for mitigation of the sentence. In June, a Hubei
Intermediate Court scheduled the trial of Internet
dissident Du Daobin on less than a week's notice, in
part to prevent Du's Beijing-based defense counsel
from appearing in court and presenting a not guilty
plea. The local attorney who defended Du declined to
submit a not guilty plea, citing fear of pressure by
local authorities.
Some lawyers who tried to defend their clients
aggressively continued to face serious intimidation
and abuse by police and prosecutors, and some were
detained. According to Article 306 of the Criminal
Law, defense attorneys could be held responsible if
their clients commit perjury, and prosecutors and
judges in such cases have wide discretion in
determining what constitutes perjury. In May,
prominent Beijing defense attorney Zhang Jianzhong was
released after serving a 2-year sentence under Article
306. Chinese legal scholars claimed he was singled out
for being too effective at representing criminal
defendants, and approximately 600 lawyers signed a
petition demanding that Zhang be found not guilty.
According to the All-China Lawyers Association, since
1997 more than 400 defense attorneys have been
detained on similar charges, and such cases continued
during the year.
During the year, Chinese and foreign lawyers, law
professors, legal journals, and jurists held seminars
and publicly debated systemic legal reform. Among the
suggested reforms were the introduction of a more
transparent system of discovery, the abolition of
coerced confessions, abolition of all forms of
administrative detention, a legal presumption of
innocence, an independent judiciary, improved
administrative laws, restriction on use of the death
penalty, reform of the media's interaction with the
court system, and adoption of a plea bargaining
system.
Government officials continued to deny holding any
political prisoners, asserting that authorities
detained persons not for their political or religious
views, but because they violated the law; however, the
authorities continued to confine citizens for reasons
related to politics and religion. Tens of thousands of
political prisoners remained incarcerated, some in
prisons and others in labor camps. The Government did
not grant international humanitarian organizations
access to political prisoners.
Western NGOs estimated that approximately 500 to 600
persons remained in prison for the repealed crime of
"counterrevolution," and thousands of others were
serving sentences under the State Security Law, which
Chinese authorities stated covers crimes similar to
counterrevolution. Persons detained for
counterrevolutionary offenses included labor activist
Hu Shigen; writer Chen Yanbin; Inner Mongolian
activist Hada; and dissidents Yu Dongyue, Zhang
Jingsheng, and Sun Xiongying. Foreign governments
urged the Government to review the cases of those
charged before 1997 with counterrevolution and to
release those who had been jailed for nonviolent
offenses under the old statute. During the year, the
Government held expert-level discussions with foreign
officials on conducting such a review, but no formal
review was initiated. However, a number of
"counterrevolutionary" prisoners were released during
the year, some after receiving sentence reductions,
including Liu Jingsheng in November and Chen Gang in
April.
Amnesty International has identified more than 80
persons by name who remained imprisoned or on medical
parole for their participation in the 1989 Tiananmen
demonstrations; other NGOs estimated that as many as
250 persons remained in prison for political
activities connected to the 1989 Tiananmen
demonstrations.
The authorities granted early release from prison to
Tibetan nun Phuntsog Nyidrol in February and CDP
co-founder Wang Youcai in March. In March, Uighur
businesswoman Rebiya Kadeer received a 1-year sentence
reduction on her 8-year sentence for supplying state
secrets to foreigners, but she was scheduled to remain
in prison until August 2006. Many others, including
Internet activists Xu Wei, Yang Zili, and Huang Qi;
journalists Zhao Yan and Jiang Weiping; labor
activists Yao Fuxin and Xiao Yunliang; Catholic Bishop
Su Zhimin; Christian activists Zhang Rongliang, Zhang
Yinan, Liu Fenggang, and Xu Yonghai; Tibetans Jigme
Gyatso, Tenzin Deleg, and Gendun Choekyi Nyima; Uighur
writer Tohti Tunyaz; CDP co-founder Qin Yongmin; and
political dissident Yang Jianli remained imprisoned or
under other forms of detention during the year.
Political prisoners generally benefited from parole
and sentence reduction at significantly lower rates
than ordinary prisoners.
Criminal punishments could include "deprivation of
political rights" for a fixed period after release
from prison, during which the individual is denied the
limited rights of free speech and association granted
to other citizens. Former prisoners also sometimes
found their status in society, ability to find
employment, freedom to travel, and access to residence
permits and social services severely restricted.
Former political prisoners and their families
frequently were subjected to police surveillance,
telephone wiretaps, searches, and other forms of
harassment, and some encountered difficulty in
obtaining or keeping employment and housing.
Officials confirmed that executed prisoners were among
the sources of organs for transplant. Transplant
doctors stated publicly in September 2003 that "the
main source [of organ donations] is voluntary
donations from condemned prisoners," but serious
questions remained concerning whether meaningful or
voluntary consent from the prisoners or their
relatives was obtained. There was no national law
governing organ donations, but a draft law was under
consideration during the year. A Ministry of Health
directive explicitly states that buying and selling
human organs and tissues is not allowed. In 2003, the
first local law regulating organ donation was passed
in Shenzhen, prohibiting the sale or trade of human
organs. The impact of this law in practice remained
unclear. As of year’s end, there were no reports of
other localities passing a similar law. There were no
reliable statistics on how many organ transplants
occurred using organs from executed prisoners.
f. Arbitrary Interference With Privacy, Family, Home,
Correspondence
The Constitution states that the "freedom and privacy
of correspondence of citizens are protected by law";
however, the authorities often did not respect the
privacy of citizens in practice. Although the law
requires warrants before law enforcement officials can
search premises, this provision frequently was
ignored; moreover, the Public Security Bureau and the
Procuratorate could issue search warrants on their own
authority. Cases of forced entry by police officers
continued to be reported.
During the year, authorities monitored telephone
conversations, facsimile transmissions, e-mail,
text-messaging, and Internet communications.
Authorities also opened and censored domestic and
international mail. The security services routinely
monitored and entered residences and offices to gain
access to computers, telephones, and fax machines. All
major hotels had a sizable internal security presence,
and hotel guestrooms were sometimes bugged and
searched for sensitive or proprietary materials.
Some dissidents were under heavy surveillance and
routinely had their telephone calls monitored or
telephone service disrupted. The authorities
frequently warned some dissidents and activists not to
meet with foreigners. During the year, police in
Beijing ordered several dissidents not to meet with
Western journalists or foreign diplomats, especially
before sensitive anniversaries, at the time of
important Government or Party meetings, and during the
visits of high-level foreign officials. These events
also sparked greater surveillance, short-term
detention, and harassment of dissidents. The
authorities also confiscated money sent from abroad
that was intended to help dissidents and their
families.
Security personnel monitored and harrassed relatives
of prominent dissidents, particularly during sensitive
periods. For example, security personnel followed the
family members of political prisoners to meetings with
Western reporters and diplomats. Dissidents and their
family members routinely were warned not to speak with
the foreign press. Police sometimes detained the
relatives of dissidents.
Official poverty alleviation programs and major state
projects have included forced relocation of persons to
new residences. The Government estimated that at least
1.2 million persons have been relocated for the Three
Gorges Dam project on the Yangtze River.
Forced relocation because of urban development
continued and, in some locations, increased during the
year. Protests, some of which included thousands of
participants, over relocation terms or compensation
were common, and some protest leaders were prosecuted
during the year (see Sections 2.b. and 3). Some
evictions in Beijing were linked to construction for
the 2008 Olympics.
In urban areas, many persons historically depended on
government-linked work units for housing, healthcare,
and other aspects of ordinary life. With the increase
in market activities and private business, these
benefits have changed so that newer employees at some
government-linked work units no longer enjoy all of
these benefits. For example, most work units now
provide housing subsidies to employees, instead of
directly alloting housing. Similarly, the work unit
and the neighborhood committee have become less
important as means of social and political control.
Government interference in daily personal and family
life continued to decline for most citizens. For
example, work unit permission is no longer required
before obtaining a divorce.
Under the country's family planning law and policies,
citizens in 6 of the country's 31 provinces still were
required to apply for government permission before
having a first child, and the Government continued to
restrict the number of births. Penalties for
out-of-plan births still included social compensation
fees and other coercive measures.
The Population and Family Planning Law, the country's
first formal law on the subject, entered into force in
2002. The National Population and Family Planning
Commission (NPFPC) enforces the law and formulates and
implements policies with assistance from the China
Family Planning Association, which had 1 million
branches nationwide. The law is intended to
standardize the implementation of the Government's
birth limitation policies; however, enforcement
continued to vary from place to place. The law grants
married couples the right to have one child and allows
eligible couples to apply for permission to have a
second child if they meet conditions stipulated in
local and provincial regulations. Many provincial
regulations require women to wait 4 years or more
after their first birth before making such an
application. According to the U.N. Population Fund
(UNFPA), the spacing requirement was removed in 5 and
relaxed in 10 of the 30 counties across 30 provinces
participating in UNFPA's "Country Program V." The
NPFPC reported that the spacing requirement was
removed in the provincial regulations of Hainan,
Jilin, and Shanghai, and UNFPA reported that the
requirement was relaxed by 15 other provincial-level
governments.
The law requires counties to use specific measures to
limit the total number of births in each county. Both
the Constitution and the family planning law further
require couples to employ birth control measures.
According to a September 2002 U.N. survey, the
percentage of women who select their own birth control
method grew from 53 percent in 1998 to 83 percent in
UNFPA-assisted counties in 2000. The law requires
couples who have an unapproved child to pay a "social
compensation fee," which sometimes reached 10 times a
person's annual income, and grants preferential
treatment to couples who abide by the birth limits.
Officials often strongly encouraged women with
multiple children to undergo sterilization, such as
tubal ligation, according to multiple reports.
Although the law states that officials should not
violate citizens' rights, neither those rights nor the
penalties for violating them are defined. The law
provides significant and detailed sanctions for
officials who help persons evade the birth
limitations.
The law delegates to the provinces the responsibility
for drafting implementing regulations, including
establishing a scale for assessment of social
compensation fees. The National Population and Family
Planning Law requires family planning officials to
obtain court approval for taking "forcible" action,
such as confiscation of property, against families
that refuse to pay social compensation fees.
The one-child limit was more strictly applied in the
cities, where only couples meeting certain conditions
(e.g., both parents are only children) were permitted
to have a second child. In most rural areas (including
towns of under 200,000 persons), where approximately
two-thirds of citizens lived, the policy was more
relaxed, generally allowing couples to have a second
child if the first was a girl or disabled. Local
officials, caught between pressures from superiors to
show declining birth rates, and from local citizens to
allow them to have more than one child, frequently
made false reports. Ethnic minorities, such as Muslim
Uighurs and Tibetans, were subject to much less
stringent population controls (see Tibet Addendum). In
remote areas, limits often were not enforced, except
on government employees and Party members.
The 2000 census enumerated the fertility rate at 1.3
births per woman, but later the Government adjusted
the figure upward to 1.8 births per woman. According
to the U.N., the fertility rate does not exceed 1.7.
According to Chinese census authorities, the yearly
growth rate of the population is 0.7 percent per year.
Media reports indicated that some parts of the country
had zero or even negative population growth, while the
growth rate continued to increase elsewhere.
Authorities continued to reduce the use of targets and
quotas. Authorities who still used the target and
quota system required each eligible married couple to
obtain government permission before the woman became
pregnant. In some counties, only a limited number of
such permits were made available each year, so couples
who did not receive a permit were required to wait at
least a year before obtaining permission. Counties
that did not employ targets and quotas allowed married
women to have a first child without prior permission.
UNFPA research showed, and the NPFPC confirmed, that
25 of China's 31 provincial-level governments had done
away with the requirement for birth permits before
conceiving a first child, the principal mechanism for
enforcing targets and quotas. Some targets remained,
such as in Liaoning Province which continues to set
provincial targets in its 5-year plan, despite having
abolished birth permits four years ago and having
eliminated target-setting at the city, county and
township levels. UNFPA reports that only Fujian,
Henan, Jiangxi, and Yunnan Provinces and the Xinjiang
Uighur Autonomous Region still required birth permits.
The country's population control policy relied on
education, propaganda, and economic incentives, as
well as on more coercive measures such as the threat
of job loss or demotion and social compensation fees.
Psychological and economic pressure were very common;
during unauthorized pregnancies, women sometimes were
visited by birth planning workers who used threats,
including that of social compensation fees, to
pressure women to terminate their pregnancies. The
fees were assessed at widely varying levels and were
generally extremely high. According to provincial
regulations, the fees ranged from one-half to 10 times
the average worker's annual disposable income. Local
officials have authority to adjust the fees downward
and did so in many cases. Additional disciplinary
measures against those who violated the child limit
policy by having an unapproved child or helping
another to do so included job loss or demotion, loss
of promotion opportunity, expulsion from the Party
(membership in which was an unofficial requirement for
certain jobs), and other administrative punishments,
including, in some cases, the destruction of property.
In the cases of families that already had two
children, one parent was often pressured to undergo
sterilization, according to reliable reports. These
penalties sometimes left women little practical choice
but to undergo abortion or sterilization. Rewards for
couples who adhered to birth limitation laws and
policies included monthly stipends and preferential
medical and educational benefits. During the year, the
NPFPC began a number of programs to encourage smaller
families. For example, new pension benefits were made
available for those who adhered to birth limitation
laws.
Seven provinces--Anhui, Hebei, Heilongjiang, Hubei,
Hunan, Jilin, and Ningxia--require "termination of
pregnancy" if the pregnancy violates provincial family
planning regulations. An additional 10
provinces--Fujian, Guizhou, Guangdong, Gansu, Jiangxi,
Qinghai, Sichuan Shanxi, Shannxi, and Yunnan--require
unspecified "remedial measures" to deal with
out-of-plan pregnancies. Article 33 of the 2002 law
states that family planning bureaus will conduct
pregnancy tests and follow-up on married women. Some
provincial regulations provide for fines if women do
not undergo periodic pregnancy tests. For example, in
Hebei the range was $24 to $60 (RMB 200 to 500), and
in Henan it was $6 to $60 (RMB 50 to 500).
At the same time, because of economic development and
other factors, such as limited housing size, both
parents working full-time, and high education
expenses, couples in major urban centers often
voluntarily limited their families to one child.
The Population and Family Planning Law delegates to
the provinces the responsibility for implementing
appropriate regulations to enforce the law. By year's
end, all provincial-level governments except the TAR
had amended their regulations to conform with the new
law. Anhui Province, for example, passed a law
permitting 13 categories of couples, including coal
miners, some remarried divorcees, and some farm
couples, to have a second child. The law does not
require such amendments, however, unless existing
regulations conflict with it. Existing regulations
requiring sterilization in certain cases are not
contradicted by the new law, which says simply that
compliance with the birth limits should "mainly" be
achieved through the use of contraception.
Central Government policy formally prohibits the use
of physical coercion to compel persons to submit to
abortion or sterilization. Because it is illegal, the
use of physical coercion was difficult to document. A
few cases were reported during the year. In June,
officials in Jieshou City, Anhui Province, forced a
woman to be sterilized, and state media reported that
the woman was injured when she jumped out of a window
in the operating room in an attempt to avoid the
procedure. In the same city, another woman committed
suicide when her relatives were detained in population
schools, facilities designed to provide reeducation to
those who violate family planning guidelines. The use
of population schools as detention centers was
condemned by Central Government officials. According
to state-media reports, the local officials
responsible for the detentions were fired or
sanctioned administratively. In response, NPFPC
officials ordered an investigation, sent a letter to
each province condemning the actions in Anhui
Province, and called on all provincial-level family
planning officials to focus on "implementing the rule
of law." Earlier in the year, media reports noted that
a drug offender in Gansu Province was forced to have
an abortion before her trial on charges punishable by
the death sentence.
Senior officials stated repeatedly that the Government
"made it a principle to ban coercion at any level,"
and the NPFPC has issued circulars nationwide
prohibiting birth planning officials from coercing
women to undergo abortions or sterilization. However,
the Government does not consider social compensation
fees and other administrative punishments to be
coercive. Under the State Compensation Law, citizens
also may sue officials who exceed their authority in
implementing birth planning policy, and, in a few
instances, individuals have exercised this right. The
NPFPC has set up a hotline for use by UNFPA project
county residents to lodge complaints against local
officials.
Corruption related to social compensation fees
reportedly decreased after the 2002 passage of State
Council Decree 357, which established that collected
"social compensation fees" must be submitted directly
to the National Treasury rather than retained by local
birth planning authorities. NPFPC officials reported
in 2002 that they responded to more than 10,000
complaints against local officials.
In order to delay childbearing, the Marriage Law sets
the minimum marriage age for women at 20 years and for
men at 22 years. It continued to be illegal in almost
all provinces for a single woman to bear a child, and
social compensation fees have been levied on unwed
mothers. The Government stated that the practice of
levying social compensation fees for "pre-marriage"
births was abolished on an experimental basis in some
counties during the year and was relaxed in cases
where couples promptly registered their marriages. In
2002, Jilin Province passed a law making it legal,
within the limits of the birth limitation law, for an
unmarried woman who "intends to remain single for
life" to have a child.
Laws and regulations forbid the termination of
pregnancies based on the sex of the fetus, but because
of the intersection of birth limitations with the
traditional preference for male children, particularly
in rural areas, many families used ultrasound
technology to identify female fetuses and terminate
these pregnancies (see Section 5). The use of
ultrasound for this purpose is prohibited specifically
by the Population Law and by the Maternal and Child
Health Care Law, both of which mandate punishment of
medical practitioners who violate the provision.
According to the NPFPC, few doctors have been charged
under these laws. The most recent official figures,
from November 2000, put the overall male to female sex
ratio at birth at 116.9 to 100 (as compared to the
statistical norm of 106 to 100), and, in some parts of
the country, the ratio was even more skewed. For
second births, the national ratio was 151.9 to 100.
Several localities experimented with new measures to
address the sex ratio imbalance. These included
restricting promotions for officials in extremely
unbalanced areas of Shaanxi Province and limiting
abortions after 14 weeks for pregnancies that were
authorized by a birth or family planning permit in
Guiyang. During the year, the NPFPC launched a "Care
for the Girl Child" initiative in 11 pilot counties to
raise awareness of the sex ratio imbalance and to
improve protection of the rights of girls.
In 2003, a new Marriage Law abolished a requirement
that couples have premarital examinations to determine
if they were at risk for passing on debilitating
genetic diseases. In addressing the risk of genetic
disease, the Maternal and Child Health Care Law
continued to recommend abortion or sterilization in
some cases. In practice, however, most regions of the
country still did not have the medical capacity to
determine accurately the likelihood of passing on
debilitating genetic diseases.
Lack of informed consent was a general problem in the
practice of medicine throughout the country.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The Constitution states that freedom of speech and
freedom of the press are fundamental rights to be
enjoyed by all citizens; however, the Government
tightly restricted these rights in practice. The
Government interpreted the Party's "leading role," as
mandated in the preamble to the Constitution, as
circumscribing these rights. The Government continued
to threaten, arrest, and imprison many individuals for
exercising free speech. A wave of detentions late in
the year appeared to signal a new campaign against
writers. Internet essayists in particular were
targeted. The Government strictly regulated the
establishment and management of publications. The
Government did not permit citizens to publish or
broadcast criticisms of senior leaders or opinions
that directly challenged Communist Party rule. The
Party and Government continued to control print,
broadcast, and electronic media tightly and used them
to propagate Government views and Party ideology. All
media employees were under explicit, public orders to
follow CCP directives and "guide public opinion," as
directed by political authorities. Formal and informal
guidelines continued to require journalists to avoid
coverage of many politically sensitive topics. These
public orders, guidelines, and statutes greatly
restricted the freedom of broadcast journalists and
newspapers to report the news and led to a high degree
of self-censorship. The Government continued an
intense propaganda campaign against the Falun Gong.
Journalists who reported on topics that met with the
Government's or local authorities' disapproval
continued to suffer harassment, detention, and
imprisonment. In January, the chief editor and six
staff members of Guangdong Province's Southern
Metropolitan Daily newspaper were detained for alleged
economic crimes. Three of the editors were prosecuted
in March on corruption charges that many observers
viewed as retaliation for the newspaper's muckraking
coverage of stories such as the emergence of SARS in
2003, its brief recurrence in 2004, and the 2003
beating death of college graduate Sun Zhigang in a
custody and repatriation camp (see Section 1.c). The
news group's general manager Yu Huafeng was sentenced
to 12 years inprisonment for embezzlement, and former
editor Li Minying received an 11-year sentence for
taking bribes. In June, their sentences were reduced
on appeal to 8 and 6 years, respectively. Current
editor-in-chief Cheng Yizhong was released in August
after charges against him were dropped. In September,
New York Times employee Zhao Yan was detained and
later formally charged with leaking state secrets
shortly after the newspaper published an article
correctly predicting the resignation of Jiang Zemin as
chairman of the Central Military Commission. The
newspaper denied that Zhao had any involvement with
the story, and prosecutors did not disclose the basis
for the charges, citing state secrets laws. Zhao Yan
had previously published several articles on rural
protests for China Reform magazine. Another farmers’
advocate who had also worked with Zhao Yan, Li
Boguang, was detained December 14. In addition,
Liaoning Province anti-corruption reporter Jiang
Weiping remained jailed, as did Sichuan local official
Li Zhi, who was convicted in 2003 of "subverting state
power" after writing on the Internet to expose
official corruption. The Committee to Protect
Journalists again assessed China as "the world's
leading jailer of journalists," with 43 journalists
imprisoned at year's end.
A wave of detentions late in the year appeared to
signal a new campaign targeting writers, political
commentators, and academics. In November, Li Guozhu
was detained for passing to foreign journalists
information and photographs about ethnic violence in
Henan Province (see Section 5). On November 24, Hunan
Province journalist Shi Tao was detained under
suspicion of leaking state secrets. On December 13,
organizers of the independent PEN Center, which
defends writers' freedoms, were detained and later
released. Those detained included Yu Jie, Liu Xiaobo,
and Zhang Zuhua. They had previously published
articles in defense of Shi Tao and held an awards
ceremony honoring the author of a banned book on the
1950s. Editor Wang Guangze of the 21st Century
Business Herald was dismissed from his job, editor
Chen Min of China Reform magazine was temporarily
detained, and the New Weekly newspaper in Wuhan was
ordered closed during this period. The week of
December 6, People's Daily twice published editorials
urging authorities to silence speech that provokes
trouble and to provide greater control over the
Internet.
In addition to criminal prosecution of writers, some
government officials used civil lawsuits to block
controversial writings. In August, the Fuyang
Intermediate People's Court in Anhui Province heard a
libel action against authors Chen Guidi and Wu Chuntao
over their book "China Peasant Survey" (Nongmin
Diaocha). The book, which was a best-seller until it
was banned from further distribution in the spring,
describes abuse and extortion of farmers by officials.
One official named in the book, former Linquan County
Communist Party secretary Zhang Xide, sued the authors
and publishing house for libel. Scholars and attorneys
stated that the lawsuit and high damages sought of
approximately $25,000 (RMB 200,000) were intended to
intimidate the publisher and inhibit criticism.
Newspapers could not report on corruption without
government and party approval, and publishers
published such material at their own risk. During the
year, journalists and editors who exposed corruption
scandals frequently faced problems with the
authorities, and the Government continued to close
publications and punish journalists for printing
material deemed too sensitive. The State Press and
Publication Administration ordered the influential
bimonthly journal "Strategy and Management" closed
indefinitely during the year, although the Government
claimed that business reasons, not editorial ones,
were behind the closure.
In August, authorities detained and deported two
foreign individuals and two journalists for displaying
a banner in Beijing reading "No Olympics for China
until Tibet is Free."
Some citizens continued to speak out and publish on
controversial topics, despite the Government's
restrictions on freedom of speech and the press. For
example, scholar Cao Siyuan, who convened a symposium
on constitutionalism, freedom of speech, and direct
elections in 2003 that attracted government attention,
continued to publish but remained under surveillance
by authorities. Huang Jingao, Party Secretary of
Lianjiang County, Fujian Province, wrote an open
letter critical of endemic corruption that was
published on websites and in the People's Daily in
August. Following the publication of the letter, he
was sanctioned, and his duties were restricted by
party officials in Fujian.
The scope of permissible private speech continued to
expand. Controversial political topics could be
discussed privately and in small groups without
punishment, so long as the speaker did not publish
controversial views or disseminate them to overseas
audiences.
Censorship related to health issues continued. In
early 2003, Government censorship of news concerning
SARS was largely responsible for slowing the public
health response to the disease. But after May 2003,
when the Government publicly acknowledged the spread
of the disease, the Government permitted greater
reporting about SARS and other infectious diseases. As
a result of lessons learned during the SARS epidemic,
the Shanghai Municipal Government named its first
public spokesperson. Nonetheless, in January, when
Guangdong Province's Southern Metropolitan Daily
newspaper reported on the reemergence of SARS cases,
an editor and six journalists working for the
newspaper were temporarily detained. Three of them
later faced criminal corruption charges. Also, Dr.
Jiang Yanyong, who exposed the spread of SARS in
Beijing in April 2003, was detained for 45 days in
June and July. Dr. Jiang's detention likely was a
response to his open letter on the 1989 Tiananmen
massacre (see Section 1.d.), rather than a direct
reaction to his writings about SARS. Government
restrictions on the press and the free flow of
information also affected accurate reporting on
HIV/AIDS. Those seeking to bring attention to the
plight of AIDS orphans in Henan Province faced
continued pressure to remain silent and were warned
against speaking to journalists. However, in April,
Vice Premier Wu Yi stated that the Government "would
strictly investigate and affix responsibility" for
those who hide, delay, or fail to report HIV/AIDS. In
August, concerns were raised that the country failed
to report outbreaks of avian influenza in poultry.
Reporting on outbreaks of the disease in bird and
animal populations was inconsistent, but there were no
reports that media coverage of the outbreak was
suppressed.
In 2003, the Government ended the practice of
requiring government work units to subscribe to
official newspapers, forcing many official newspapers
to compete for readership or face insolvency. As a
result, 677 newspapers were closed between September
2003 and March 2004. Journalists noted that the
pressure to expand circulation sometimes conflicted
with state control and censorship dictates because one
way to expand readership was to provide accurate
reporting about controversial topics.
There were a few privately owned print publications,
but they were subject to pre- and post-publication
censorship. There were no privately owned television
or radio stations, and the Government had authority to
approve all programming, although it occasionally did
not preview all programs.
The publishing industry consists of three kinds of
book businesses: Approximately 560
government-sanctioned publishing houses, smaller
independent publishers that cooperated with official
publishing houses to put out more daring publications,
and an underground (illicit) press.
Government-approved publishing houses were the only
organizations legally permitted to print books. No
newspaper, periodical, book, audio, video, or
electronic publication may be printed or distributed
without the printer and distributor being approved by
the relevant provincial publishing authorities and the
State Press and Publications Administration (PPA). The
Communist Party exerted control over the publishing
industry by preemptively classifying certain topics as
off-limits; selectively rewarding with promotions and
perks those publishers, editors, and writers who
adhered to Party guidelines; and punishing those who
did not adhere to Party guidelines with administrative
sanctions and blacklisting. Some independent
publishers took advantage of a loophole in the law to
sign contracts with government publishing houses to
publish politically sensitive works. These works
generally were not subject to the same multi-layered
review process as official publications of the
publishing houses.
Underground printing houses have been targets of
periodic campaigns to stop all illegal publications
(including pornography and pirated computer software
and audiovisual products). These campaigns sometimes
had the effect of restricting the availability of
politically sensitive books.
Many intellectuals and scholars, anticipating that
books or papers on political topics would be deemed
too sensitive to be published, exercised
self-censorship. Overt intervention by the PPA,
responsible for all printing and distribution in the
country, and by the Party Central Propaganda
Department, which provides editorial guidelines for
all media, mostly occurred after publication. In areas
such as economic policy or legal reform, there was far
greater official tolerance for comment and debate.
Criticism of Central Government authorities continued
to remain largely off-limits.
Among books banned during the year were "China Peasant
Survey," and "The Past Does Not Go Up In Smoke," a
collection of essays dealing with the effect of
political tumult in the 1950s and 1960s on the lives
of prominent Chinese intellectuals. In January,
authorities issued regulations restricting publication
of books on constitutional reform to three official
publishing houses. In 2002, the Department of Cultural
Affairs in Urumqi, Xinjiang, ordered the destruction
of thousands of books on Uighur history and culture.
The books detailing and documenting Uighur history
originally had been published with the approval of the
authorities.
The authorities continued to jam, with varying degrees
of success, Chinese-, Uighur-, and Tibetan-language
broadcasts of the Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free
Asia (RFA) and the British Broadcasting Corporation
(BBC). English-language broadcasts on VOA generally
were not jammed, unless they immediately followed
Chinese-language broadcasts, in which case portions of
the English-language broadcasts were sometimes jammed.
Government jamming of RFA and BBC appeared to be more
frequent and effective. Internet distribution of
"streaming radio" news from these sources often was
blocked. Despite jamming, in the absence of an
independent press, overseas broadcasts such as VOA,
BBC, RFA, and Radio France International had a large
audience, including activists, ordinary citizens, and
even government officials.
The Government prohibited some foreign and domestic
films from appearing in the country. Television
broadcasts of foreign programming, which were
restricted largely to hotel and foreign residence
compounds, also suffered from occasional censorship of
topics including sensitive political issues. In
southern China, where television programming from Hong
Kong was available, "public service announcements"
frequently interrupted news items critical of the
Government.
The Government continued to encourage expanded use of
the Internet; however, it also took steps to increase
monitoring of the Internet and continued to place
restrictions on the information available. Over 80
million persons regularly used the Internet, including
those in urban and rural areas, according to surveys
conducted during the year. In July, the Government
began implementing new measures to monitor and filter
text-messaging. The measures were designed to control
for politically sensitive content and to stop the
spread of pornography.
The country's Internet control system employed more
than 30,000 persons and was allegedly the largest in
the world. According to a 2002 Harvard University
report, the Government blocked at least 19,000 sites
during a 6-month period and may have blocked as many
as 50,000. At times, the Government blocked the sites
of some major foreign news organizations, health
organizations, educational institutions, Taiwanese and
Tibetan businesses and organizations, religious and
spiritual organizations, democracy activists, and
sites discussing the 1989 Tiananmen massacre. The
number of blocked sites appeared to increase around
major political events and sensitive dates. The
authorities reportedly began to employ more
sophisticated technology enabling the selective
blocking of specific content rather than entire
websites in some cases. Such technology was also used
to block e-mails containing sensitive content. The
Government generally did not prosecute citizens who
received dissident e mail publications, but forwarding
such messages to others sometimes did result in
detention. Internet usage reportedly was monitored at
all terminals in public libraries.
The Ministry of Information Industry regulated access
to the Internet while the Ministries of Public and
State Security monitored its use. Regulations prohibit
a broad range of activities that authorities have
interpreted as subversive or as slanderous to the
state, including the dissemination of any information
that might harm unification of the country or endanger
national security. Promoting "evil cults" was banned,
as was providing information that "disturbs social
order or undermines social stability." Internet
service providers (ISPs) were instructed to use only
domestic media news postings, record information
useful for tracking users and their viewing habits,
install software capable of copying e-mails, and
immediately end transmission of so-called subversive
material. Many ISPs practiced extensive
self-censorship to avoid violating very broadly worded
regulations. A study released in 2003 by Reporters
Without Borders reported that only 30 percent of
messages with "controversial content" were allowed
onto Chinese "chatroom" websites. The remaining 70
percent of messages were filtered out by censors or
removed by the site host.
Several individuals were jailed for their Internet
publications during the year. On March 16, Shanghai
resident Ma Yalian was sentenced to 18 months’
reeducation through labor for posting articles on
legal websites about her attempts to stop destruction
of her home. Ma's web postings described police
harassment of petitioners and suicide attempts outside
government offices. In May, freelance journalist Liu
Shui was sentenced to 2 years’ administrative
detention in Shenzhen in what NGOs claimed was
retaliation for essays about reassessing the 1989
Tiananmen massacre and political reform that he wrote
and posted on the Internet. Former Hubei Province
civil servant Du Daobin was convicted of inciting
subversion in June for his Internet writings about
democracy. Du's prison sentence was suspended, but he
appealed his conviction, arguing that his trial was
unfair and that his writings did not incite subversion
and were protected free speech (see Section 1.e.). In
August, house Christians Liu Fenggang, Xu Yonghai, and
Zhang Shengqi were convicted of disclosing state
intelligence after using the Internet to send reports
about the abuse of house Christians to overseas
organizations. They were sentenced to 1 to 3 years in
prison (see Section 2.c.). In September, Shenyang
Internet writers Kong Youping and Ning Xianhua were
sentenced, respectively, to 15 and 12 years in prison
on charges of "subversion of state power" for posting
articles and poems in support of the CDP. In November,
Hunan Province journalist Shi Tao was detained,
reportedly on state secrets charges. Shi had
previously written for Contemporary Trade News and
published an on-line article in April opposing the
detention of Tiananmen Mothers' organization
co-founder Ding Zilin. The NGO Reporters Without
Borders called China "the biggest jail in the world
for cyberdissidents." The Committee for the Protection
of Journalists reported that the country had 43
journalists jailed at year's end.
In addition to imprisoning several persons during the
year for disseminating information through the
Internet, the Government detained several individuals
for using the Internet to express support for other
detained Internet activists. Liu Di was detained for a
year after she expressed sympathy for Sichuan website
manager Huang Qi and wrote pro-reform articles
on-line. Huang ran a website that contained postings
discussing the June 4, 1989 Tiananmen massacre until
it was closed down, and he was detained on June 3,
2000. In November 2003, Liu Di was released after a
court found that the evidence against her was
insufficient; however, some persons detained for
supporting her remained in custody at year's end.
Among them, Kong Youping was sentenced to 15 years in
prison in September for political writings, including
many that expressed support for Liu Di.
The Government's "Public Pledge on Self Discipline for
China's Internet Industry" continued during the year.
More than 300 companies signed the pledge, including
the popular Sina.com and Sohu.com, as well as
foreign-based Yahoo!'s China division. Those who
signed the pledge agreed not to spread information
that "breaks laws or spreads superstition or
obscenity." They also promised to refrain from
"producing, posting, or disseminating pernicious
information that may jeopardize state security and
disrupt social stability." The China Internet
Association adopted a "self-regulatory pledge" for
search engine services during the year that was viewed
by many as even stricter than the Government's self
discipline pledge.
As of July, the China Internet Network Information
Center said there were 87 million Internet users, 22
percent of whom access the web at Internet cafes. As
of 2002, the country had more than 200,000 licensed
Internet cafes, and a number of unlicensed ones as
well. During the year, state media reported that
several municipalities cracked down on illegal
Internet cafes, including over 2,000 illegal cafes in
Shenzhen. On April 27, the Ministry of Culture
announced that, by the end of the year, all Internet
cafes must install software that allows Government
officials to monitor customers’ web usage. Internet
users at the cafes often are subject to surveillance.
A May 24 China Newsweek article reported that at one
popular Beijing Internet cafe with 320 computers,
eight employees served as Internet monitors, while 10
other staff members walked around the room to check if
customers were accessing "illegal" websites. Patrons
caught entering such sites were given warnings. Most
places sporadically enforced regulations requiring
patrons to provide identification when using Internet
cafes. In response to the health crisis caused by
SARS, the authorities closed all the nation's Internet
cafes in April 2003. Beijing cafes stayed closed until
August 2003, while cafes in Shanghai and Sichuan
reopened sooner.
In February, the Government announced that it would
invest nearly $6 million (RMB 49.8 million) to create
a new system to control political publication on the
Internet. Monitoring and censorship of Internet
bulletin boards and chatrooms was especially strict at
the time of sensitive anniversaries or key political
meetings. For example, in September, a popular
bulletin board at Beijing University was closed in the
period before the Fourth Party Plenum meeting, and
Internet censorship also increased before the March
NPC session. In September, a local newspaper reported
that authorities in Liaoning Province shut down an
Internet website devoted to exposing official
corruption, even though the website's administrator
had obtained prior official approval.
In July, the Government began censoring text messages
distributed by mobile telephone. According to state
media, the campaign was designed to stop the spread of
pornographic messages by phone, as well as to block
circulation of illicit news and information. All text
messaging service providers were required to install
filtering equipment to monitor and delete messages
deemed offensive by authorities. In the first week of
the campaign's operation, the Government reportedly
fined 10 companies and forced 20 others to close for
failure to comply. As with print, broadcast, and
Internet media, the Propaganda Department determined
banned topics. In 2003, mobile phone users sent
approximately 220 billion text messages, according to
China Telecom.
The Government did not respect academic freedom and
continued to impose ideological controls on political
discourse at colleges, universities, and research
institutes. Scholars and researchers reported varying
degrees of control regarding issues they could examine
and conclusions they could draw. For example, several
professors were warned against calling for abolition
of reeducation through labor. In March, Beijing
University professor Jiao Guobiao published a
criticism of Chinese censorship, listing his "14 Evils
of the Central Propaganda Department." In August, his
university threatened him with dismissal and
indefinitely suspended him from teaching. Guangxi
Normal University Professor Chen Qin reportedly
suffered a stroke in July while being interrogated by
security officials concerning his on-line essays
criticizing political and social institutions. Scholar
Xu Zerong remained in prison for "illegally providing
state secrets" by sending sensitive reference
materials on the Korean War to a contact in Hong Kong.
Scholars studying religion reported that, during the
year, the official Protestant church blocked some
publications it found objectionable.
The Government continued to use political attitudes as
criteria for selecting persons for the few
government-sponsored study abroad programs, but did
not impose such restrictions on privately sponsored
students. More than 7,200 students studied abroad, a
record according to the China Scholarship Council.
Researchers residing abroad also were subject to
sanctions from the authorities when their work did not
meet with official approval. In July, a Chinese-born
overseas scholar was detained in Shanghai for 2 weeks
and then forced to leave the country after being
charged with disclosing state secrets in the course of
his academic research on reform of the household
registration system.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
The Constitution provides for freedom of peaceful
assembly; however, the Government severely restricted
this right in practice. The Constitution stipulates
that such activities may not challenge "Party
leadership" or infringe upon the "interests of the
State." Protests against the political system or
national leaders were prohibited. Authorities denied
permits and quickly moved to suppress demonstrations
involving expression of dissenting political views.
At times, police used excessive force against
demonstrators. Demonstrations with political or social
themes were often broken up quickly and violently. The
vast majority of demonstrations during the year
concerned economic and social issues such as land,
housing, health, and welfare. Land disputes,
industrial disputes, and anti-government protests were
the three main causes of civil disturbances, according
to a 2004 study of publicly reported protests. Citing
government statistics, government-run Outlook magazine
reported that over 58,000 "mass incidents" took place
during 2003, more than 6 times the number reported 10
years earlier. Some of these demonstrations included
thousands of participants. According to government
statistics reported in Hong Kong, more than 2.3
million people took part in petitions, marches, and
sit-ins in urban areas in 2003, while over 8 million
participated in demonstrations in rural areas.
Ministry of Public Security publications indicated
that the number of demonstrations continued to grow
and that protesters were becoming more organized.
Authorities detained potential protesters before the
anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre and other
sensitive events to head off public demonstrations
(see Section 1.d.). In the period before the April
"Qingming" holiday, which has often served as a time
of public commemoration of the 1989 Tiananmen events,
regulations were passed outlawing Tiananmen
commemorative activities. In late March, "Tiananmen
Mothers" organization co-founders Ding Zilin, Jiang
Xianling, and Huang Jinping were confined in separate
locations to prevent them from meeting with other
victims' family members to commemorate the death of
their relatives in the June 4, 1989 violence. In early
April, when AIDS activist Hu Jia stated his intention
to commemorate the anniversary in their absence, he
was also detained. All were released but some were
prevented from returning to Beijing until after the
holiday was over. On June 1, retired PLA doctor Jiang
Yanyong and his wife were also detained in the period
before the anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen massacre
(see Section 2.d.). Western media reported that
approximately 20 people were detained and taken away
from Tiananmen Square on June 4 for attempting to
commemorate the 1989 events.
Labor protests over restructuring of SOEs and
resulting unemployment continued, and the number of
such protests increased slightly over 2003, although
they remained smaller in scale than the large labor
protests which occurred in 2002. In February, a
protest by some 2,000 workers seeking severance
benefits from Hubei Province's bankrupt, state-owned
Tieshu textile factory was suppressed by force. Nine
workers were detained, and four faced criminal
charges. In July, 23 laid-off coal miners from
Heilongjiang Province threated a mass suicide from the
roof of a building near the Supreme People's Court
when their petitions for compensation went unanswered.
They were detained, and miners traveling to Beijing to
support them were stopped by police. Protests by
migrant laborers and construction workers, who
demonstrated when employers withheld their salaries or
underpaid them, continued. The Government passed
legislation requiring that companies pay such workers
and stepped up enforcement measures against some
delinquent employers during the year (see Section
6.b.).
Protests, some of which included thousands of
participants, concerning land, housing, and forced
evictions were also widespread. The jailing of former
Shanghai housing lawyer Zheng Enchong in October 2003,
after his advocacy for hundreds of Shanghai residents
displaced in a controversial urban redevelopment
project, prompted demonstrations by his supporters in
March. Similarly, Beijing and Tianjin-based housing
petitioners and victims of forced eviction policies
were detained in August and September to prevent them
from holding a planned 10,000-person rally (see
Section 3). On August 1, in Fujian Province's Wanli
village, police officers beat hundreds of farmers who
protested government land seizures.
The Government continued to wage a severe political,
propaganda, and police campaign against the Falun Gong
movement. The sustained government crackdown against
the movement, which the Government banned in 1999,
continued, and there were no reports of public
protests during the year. In many cases, Falun Gong
practitioners were subject to close scrutiny by local
security personnel, and their personal mobility was
tightly restricted, particularly at times when the
Government believed public protests were likely.
Activist Li Dan was beaten and Pan Zhongfeng was
detained in Shangqiu, Henan Province, during a July
demonstration protesting closure of an AIDS orphanage
and school.
The Constitution provides for freedom of association;
however, the Government restricted this right in
practice. Communist Party policy and government
regulations require that all professional, social, and
economic organizations officially register with, and
be approved by, the Government. Ostensibly aimed at
restricting secret societies and criminal gangs, these
regulations also prevented the formation of truly
autonomous political, human rights, religious,
spiritual, environmental, social, labor, and youth
organizations that might challenge government
authority. Since 1999, all concerts, sports events,
exercise classes, or other meetings of more than 200
persons require approval from Public Security
authorities. In practice, much smaller gatherings ran
the risk of being disrupted by authorities in some
places.
No laws or regulations specifically govern the
formation of political parties. But the China
Democracy Party (CDP) remained banned, and the
Government continued to surveil, detain, and imprison
current and former CDP members (see Section 3).
According to government statistics on NGOs, at the end
of 2003, there were approximately 142,000 social
organizations, including 1,736 national-level and
cross-provincial organizations, 21,030 provincial
organizations, 48,731 local and county-level
organizations registered with the Ministry of Civil
Affairs, and others. NGOs were required to register
with the Government. To register, an NGO must find a
government agency willing to serve as the NGO’s
organizational sponsor, have a registered office, and
hold a minimal amount of funds. Experts estimated that
there were between one and two million unregistered
NGOs. Although the registered organizations all came
under some degree of government control, some were
able to develop their own agendas. Some had support
from foreign secular and religious NGOs. Some were
able to undertake limited advocacy roles in such
public interest areas as women's issues, the
environment, health, and consumer rights. According to
government guidelines, NGOs must not advocate
non-party rule, damage national unity, or upset ethnic
harmony. Groups that disobeyed guidelines and
unregistered groups that continued to operate could
face administrative punishment or criminal charges. In
addition, there were 124,000 private, nonprofit
corporations registered in 2003, an increase of 11.7
percent over 2002. Many of these groups functioned
like NGOs, with 90,000 operating in the education and
health fields, 9,037 in labor, 7,792 in civil society,
1,777 providing social services, and 728 in legal
services. During the year, the Government passed a new
law regulating charitable foundations and gave NGOs
greater autonomy to establish the amount of their
membership dues.
c. Freedom of Religion
The Constitution provides for freedom of religious
belief and the freedom not to believe; however, the
Government sought to restrict religious practice to
government-sanctioned organizations and registered
places of worship and to control the growth and scope
of the activity of religious groups. There are five
official religions: Buddhism, Taoism, Islam,
Protestantism, and Catholicism. A
government-affiliated association monitored and
supervised the activities of each of the five faiths.
Membership in religions grew rapidly. While the
Government generally did not seek to suppress this
growth outright, it tried to control and regulate
religious groups to prevent the rise of sources of
authority outside the control of the Government and
the Party.
Overall, government respect for religious freedom
remained poor, although the extent of religious
freedom varied widely within the country. Freedom to
participate in officially sanctioned religious
activity increased in many areas of the country, but
crackdowns against unregistered groups, including
underground Protestant and Catholic groups, Muslim
Uighurs, and Tibetan Buddhists (see Tibet Addendum)
continued and worsened in some locations. The
Government continued its repression of groups that it
determined to be "cults" and of the Falun Gong
spiritual movement in particular.
All religious groups and spiritual movements were
required to register with the State Administration for
Religious Affairs (SARA, formerly known as the central
Religious Affairs Bureau) or its provincial or local
offices (still known as Religious Affairs Bureaus
(RABs)). SARA and the RABs were responsible for
monitoring and judging the legitimacy of religious
activity. SARA and the Communist Party's United Front
Work Department provided policy "guidance and
supervision" over implementation of government
regulations on religious activity.
In January, a national work conference on religion
organized by SARA was held to "strengthen religious
work." According to official media, the conference
recommended that officials guard against
Christian-influenced "cults" and avoid negative
influences, including "foreign infiltration under
cover of religion." Conference attendees also raised
concern about circulation of foreign religious
materials addressing the growth of Christianity in the
country, including a documentary film entitled "The
Cross" and a book entitled "Jesus in Beijing."
Subsequently, many provinces convened their own local
work conferences. In March, the 10th National
Committee of the Chinese People's Political
Consultative Conference (CPPCC) recommended revising
the CPPCC Charter to permit the "freedom of religious
belief." On November 30, the State Council issued new
regulations governing religious affairs, shifting the
national system of registration from one focused on
religious sites to one focused on religious
organizations and individuals. The new regulations
made no reference to the five official religions.
A national campaign to require religious groups to
register or to come under the supervision of official
"patriotic" religious organizations continued during
the year. Some groups registered voluntarily, some
registered under pressure, some avoided officials in
an attempt to avoid registration, and authorities
refused to register others. Some unofficial groups
reported that authorities refused them registration
without explanation. The Government contended that
these refusals were mainly the result of failure to
meet requirements concerning facilities and meeting
spaces. Many religious groups were reluctant to comply
with the regulations out of principled opposition to
state control of religion or due to fear of adverse
consequences if they revealed, as required, the names
and addresses of church leaders and members.
Local authorities' handling of unregistered religious
groups, particularly Protestant "house churches,"
varied widely. In certain regions, Government
supervision of religious activity was minimal, and
registered and unregistered Protestant and Catholic
churches existed openly side-by-side and were treated
similarly by the authorities. In such areas, many
congregants worshipped in both types of churches, and
congregants in unregistered churches procured Bibles
at official churches. In some parts of the country,
unregistered house churches with hundreds of members
met openly, with the full knowledge of local
authorities, who characterized the meetings as
informal gatherings to pray, sing, and study the
Bible. In other areas, house church meetings of more
than a handful of family members and friends were
strictly proscribed. House churches often encountered
difficulties when their membership grew, when they
arranged for the regular use of facilities for the
purpose of conducting religious activities, or when
they forged links with other unregistered groups. As a
result, urban house churches were generally limited to
meetings of a few dozen members or less, while
meetings of unregistered Protestants in small cities
and rural areas could number in the hundreds.
Leaders of unauthorized groups were sometimes the
targets of harassment, interrogation, detention, and
physical abuse. Police closed scores of "underground"
mosques, temples, seminaries, Catholic churches, and
Protestant "house churches," including many with
significant memberships, properties, financial
resources, and networks. Authorities particularly
targeted unofficial religious groups in locations
where there were rapidly growing numbers of
unregistered churches or in places of long-seated
conflict between official and unofficial churches,
such as with Catholics in Baoding, Hebei Province or
with evangelical underground Protestant groups as in
Henan Province and elsewhere.
The Government in many areas intensified pressure
against Protestant house churches and their leaders
during the year. In January, house Christian activists
Qiao Chunling, Xu Yongling, and Zeng Guangbo
reportedly were detained because of their alleged
effort to communicate with foreigners about activities
of house churches. House Christian activists in
several regions were prevented from leaving their
homes during the meeting of the National People's
Congress in March. In June, the government-run Legal
Daily newspaper reported that Jiang Zongxiu had died
in police custody in Guizhou Province after being
detained for distributing Bibles. Her body showed
signs of physical abuse, and reliable reports
indicated that she had been beaten in administrative
detention. A Legal Daily editorial comment condemned
local officials for mistreating Jiang. In April, more
than 100 members of the Three Classes of Servants
Church reportedly were detained in Heilongjiang
Province, and most were later released. In June,
dozens of leaders of the China Gospel Fellowship
Protestant Church reportedly were detained in Wuhan,
Hubei Province, but they were later released. In July,
more than 100 house church leaders from Anhui Province
were reportedly detained in Xinjiang while on a
religious retreat. The same month, some 40 house
church leaders were detained while attending a
religious training seminar in Chengdu, Sichuan
Province. In August, more than 100 house Christians
were reportedly detained while on a religious retreat
in Kaifeng, Henan Province. On August 6, Beijing-based
Christian activist Liu Fenggang, Beijing homeless
advocate Dr. Xu Yonghai, and Jilin Internet writer
Zhang Shengqi were convicted and sentenced to 3, 2,
and 1 years in prison, respectively, on charges of
providing national intelligence overseas. The charges
stemmed from an article Liu wrote and allegedly
distributed to the foreign-based Chinese Christian
magazine Christian Life Quarterly, which discussed
persecution of other Chinese Christians and
destruction of house churches. On September 11,
Beijing-based pastor Cai Zhuohua was detained for his
involvement in printing and distributing Christian
literature. In December, underground church leader
Zhang Rongliang was detained in Henan Province, and
his whereabouts remained unknown at year’s end. House
church historian Zhang Yinan, who was detained in
2003, remained in a reeducation-through-labor camp in
Pingdingshan County, Henan Province. Gouxing Philip
Xu, however, reportedly was released from a
reeducation-through-labor camp in June after being
detained in 2002 in Shanghai.
A number of Catholic priests and lay leaders also were
beaten or otherwise abused during the year, prompting
Vatican officials formally to protest mistreatment. In
Hebei Province, where approximately half of the
country's Catholics reside, friction between
unofficial Catholics and local authorities continued.
Hebei authorities have forced many underground priests
and believers to choose between joining the Patriotic
Church (the officially sanctioned Catholic Church) or
facing fines, job losses, periodic detentions, and, in
some cases, the removal of their children from school.
Some Catholics have been forced into hiding. In June,
the Vatican formally protested the detention earlier
in the year of three underground Catholic bishops from
Hebei Province. Two were released shortly after their
detention, although the whereabouts of 84-year-old
Zhao Zhendong of Xuanhua City remained unclear at
year's end. Underground Bishops Wei Jingyi of
Heilongjiang Province and Jia Zhiguo of Hebei Province
reportedly were detained for a few days before being
released in March and April, respectively. Jia Zhiguo
reportedly was again detained for several days in
June, along with two other underground bishops. In
August, eight underground clergy in Quyang County,
Hebei Province, reportedly were detained while
attending a religious retreat. At Christmas, a priest
in Zhejiang Province, Wang Zhongfa, was reportedly
detained, and religious services for both Catholics
and Protestants were disrupted. There were conflicting
reports about 76-year-old Shandong Province Bishop Gao
Kexian, whom some sources claimed died in prison
during the year. Reliable sources also reported that
Bishop An Shuxin, Bishop Zhang Weizhu, Father Cui
Xing, and Father Wang Quanjun remained detained in
Hebei Province. There was no new information about
underground Bishop Su Zhimin, who has been unaccounted
for since his reported detention in 1997. Reports
suggested that he had been held in a form of house
arrest. The Government continued to deny taking
coercive measures against him and stated he was
traveling as a missionary.
During the year, local officials destroyed several
unregistered places of worship around the country. In
Zhejiang Province, there were continued reports that
churches and shrines were closed or destroyed,
although less often than in 2003. Zhejiang authorities
often claimed that destroyed buildings were not zoned
for religious activities, or were unsafe, or both. In
February, a fire killed 39 worshippers and destroyed a
makeshift temple in Zhejiang's Haining City. Visitors
to Xinjiang Autonomous Region reported that mosques
also have been destroyed, although some attributed the
demolition as much to inter-religious conflict between
Hui and Uighur Muslims as to government antagonism. In
August, members of the Buddhist Foundation of America
reported that a temple they had helped to restore in
Tongliao, Inner Mongolia, was closed and the
rededication ceremony cancelled by local officials.
Spiritual leader Dechan Jeren (Yu Tianjian) was
detained, and government authorities claimed he had
misled followers about his status as a living Buddha.
The Government continued to restore or rebuild some
churches, temples, mosques, and monasteries damaged or
destroyed during the Cultural Revolution, and new
facilities were constructed during the year. In March,
the Government began construction of two new
Protestant churches in Beijing, the first new churches
to be constructed in the capital since 1949.
Similarly, the site of the 135-year-old former Holy
Trinity Cathedral in Shanghai was renovated at
government expense and reopened as headquarters of the
official Protestant China Christian Council and
Three-Self Patriotic Movement. The number of restored
and rebuilt temples, churches, and mosques remained
inadequate to accommodate the increase in religious
believers. The difficulty in registering new places of
worship led to serious overcrowding in existing places
of worship in some areas. Some observers cited the
lack of adequate meeting space in registered churches
to explain the rapid rise in attendance at house
churches and "underground" churches.
The law does not prohibit religious believers from
holding public office; however, party membership is
required for almost all high-level positions in
Government, state-owned businesses, and many official
organizations. During the year, Communist Party
officials again stated that party membership and
religious belief were incompatible. The Routine
Service Regulations of the People's Liberation Army
state explicitly that service members "may not take
part in religious or superstitious activities." Party
and PLA personnel have been expelled for adhering to
Falun Gong beliefs.
Despite official regulations encouraging officials to
be atheists, in some localities as many as 25 percent
of Party officials engaged in some kind of religious
activity. Most of these officials practiced Buddhism
or a folk religion. The National People's Congress
(NPC) included several religious representatives. Two
of the NPC Standing Committee's vice chairmen are Fu
Tieshan, a bishop and vice-chairman of the Chinese
Catholic Patriotic Association, and Pagbalha Geleg
Namgyal, a Tibetan reincarnate lama. Religious groups
also were represented in the Chinese People's
Political Consultative Conference, an advisory forum
for "multiparty" cooperation and consultation led by
the CCP, and in local and provincial governments.
Official religious organizations administered local
religious schools, seminaries, and institutes to train
priests, ministers, imams, Islamic scholars, and
Buddhist monks. Students who attended these institutes
had to demonstrate "political reliability," and all
graduates must pass an examination on their political
as well as theological knowledge to qualify for the
clergy. The Government permitted registered religions
to train clergy and allowed limited numbers of
Catholic and Protestant seminarians, Muslim clerics,
and Buddhist clergy to go abroad for additional
religious studies, but some religion students have had
difficulty getting passports or obtaining approval to
study abroad. In most cases, foreign organizations
provided funding for such training programs.
Both official and unofficial Christian churches had
problems training adequate numbers of clergy to meet
the needs of their growing congregations. Because of
restrictions and prohibitions on religion between 1955
and 1985, no priests or other clergy in official
churches were ordained during that period. Thus, as
senior clerics retire, there were relatively few
experienced clerics to replace them. The Government
stated that the official Catholic Church had trained
more than 900 priests in the past decade.
Traditional folk religions such as Fujian Province's
"Mazu cult" were still practiced in some locations.
They were tolerated to varying degrees, often seen as
loose affiliates of Taoism or as ethnic minority
cultural practices. However, at the same time, folk
religions were labeled "feudal superstition" and
sometimes were repressed because their resurgence was
seen as a threat to Party control. In recent years,
local authorities have destroyed thousands of shrines;
however, there were no reports of widespread
destruction during the year.
Buddhists made up the largest body of organized
religious believers. The traditional practice of
Buddhism continued to expand among citizens in many
parts of the country. Tibetan Buddhists in some areas
outside of the TAR had growing freedom to practice
their faith. However, some government restrictions
remained, particularly in cases in which the
Government interpreted Buddhist belief as supporting
separatism, such as in some Tibetan areas and parts of
the Inner Mongolian Autonomous Region. Visits by
emissaries of the Dalai Lama occurred in 2002, 2003,
and September, 2004. Lodi Gyari, the Dalai Lama's
representative to the United States, was a member of
the September delegation (see Tibet Addendum).
Regulations restricting Muslims' religious activity,
teaching, and places of worship continued to be
implemented forcefully in Xinjiang. In some areas of
Xinjiang where ethnic unrest has occurred, officials
restricted the building of mosques and the training of
clergy. Authorities reportedly continued to prohibit
the teaching of Islam to children under the age of 18
in some areas where ethnic unrest has occurred,
although children studied Arabic and the Koran without
restriction in many other areas. For example, local
officials have stated that persons younger than 18 are
forbidden from entering mosques in Xinjiang, but this
policy was enforced unevenly. Authorities also
reserved the right to censor imams' sermons. In
particular, imams were urged to emphasize the damage
caused to Islam by terrorist acts in the name of the
religion.
Fundamentalist Muslim leaders received particularly
harsh treatment. In 2000, the authorities began
conducting monthly political study sessions for
religious personnel; the program reportedly continued
during the year. In August, eight Uighur Muslims in
Hotan District were reportedly charged with
endangering state security, and scores were detained
on charges of engaging in "illegal religious
activities." Because of government control of
information coming from Xinjiang, such reports were
difficult to confirm.
There were numerous official media reports that the
authorities confiscated illegal religious publications
in Xinjiang. The Xinjiang People's Publication House
was the only publisher allowed to print Muslim
literature, and stores reported that those selling
literature not included on Government lists of
permitted items risked closure. In addition to the
restrictions on practicing religion placed on party
members and government officials throughout the
country, teachers, professors, and university students
in Xinjiang were not allowed to practice religion
openly. Officials also reportedly restricted mosque
building in some areas of Xinjiang, especially where
unrest had occurred. However, in other areas,
particularly in areas traditionally populated by the
non-Central Asian Hui ethnic group, there was
substantial religious building construction and
renovation. Mosque destruction, which sometimes
occurred in Xinjiang, occasionally resulted from
intra-religious conflict.
The Government permitted Muslim citizens to make the
Hajj to Mecca and in some cases subsidized the
journey. A record number of nearly 10,000 Muslims made
the Hajj during the year, nearly half of whom went
with government-organized delegations. Other Muslims
made the trip to Mecca via third countries. According
to international Uighur groups, Uighur Muslims had
greater difficulty getting permission to make the Hajj
than other Muslim groups, such as Hui Muslims, and
some Uighurs elected not to attempt to go for fear of
repercussions.
The Government and the Holy See had not established
diplomatic relations, and there was no Vatican
representative on the Mainland. The Government stated
that the role of the Pope in selecting bishops, the
status of underground Catholic clerics, Vatican
recognition of Taiwan, and the canonization of
controversial Catholic missionaries on Chinese
National Day in 2000 remained obstacles to improved
relations. During the year, the Government stated that
the political activities of Hong Kong Diocese Bishop
Joseph Zen in the Hong Kong SAR had become a further
obstacle to normalization of relations with the
Vatican. Nonetheless, Bishop Zen paid a public visit
to Shanghai in April.
The Government's refusal to allow the official
Catholic Church to recognize the authority of the
Papacy in many fundamental matters of faith and morals
caused many Catholics to reject the official Catholic
Church. Most bishops of the official Catholic Church
were, in fact, recognized by the Vatican. However,
friction between bishops who have been consecrated
with Vatican approval and others consecrated without
such approval continued, producing leadership
conflicts. Foreign media reported that, at the
consecration ceremony of some bishops during the year,
both government and Vatican approval was stated
publicly.
The increase in the number of Christians resulted in a
corresponding increase in the demand for Bibles, which
were available for purchase at most officially
recognized churches and some bookstores. Although the
country had only one government-approved publisher of
Bibles and distribution had been a problem in the
past, the shortage of Bibles in previous years
appeared largely to have abated. Members of
underground churches complained that the supply and
distribution of Bibles in some places, particularly
rural locations, was inadequate. Official churches
said they discouraged the sale of Bibles outside the
church to protect their copyright and financial
interests, not to restrict distribution. They
emphasized that versions of the Bible are available
for less than $1 (RMB 8.3). Individuals could not
order Bibles directly from publishing houses, making
it difficult for some Christians to buy Bibles in
volume. Customs officials continued to monitor for the
"smuggling" of Bibles and other religious materials
into the country, but there were no new cases of
significant punishments for Bible importation. There
were credible reports that the authorities sometimes
confiscated Bibles and other religious material in
raids on house churches.
Regulations enacted in 1994 and expanded in 2000
codified many existing rules involving religious
practice by foreigners, including a ban on
proselytizing. However, for the most part, the
authorities allowed foreign nationals to preach to
other foreigners, to bring in religious materials for
personal use, and to preach to citizens at churches,
mosques, and temples at the invitation of registered
religious organizations. Religious worship by
foreigners was permitted in unregistered facilities so
long as citizens did not attend the services. In a
number of major cities, regular worship services for
foreigners were held, including Catholic, Protestant,
Muslim, Jewish, and Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-Day Saints services. Foreigners were barred
from conducting missionary activities, but some
foreign religious groups were involved in education
and providing social services.
Some foreign church organizations came under pressure
to register with government authorities, and some
foreign missionaries whose activities extended to
citizens were expelled or asked to leave the country.
The Government stated that those asked to leave had
violated the law. In addition, the Government banned
foreign-produced materials about Christianity in the
country, including the documentary film "The Cross"
and the book "Jesus in Beijing."
The authorities continued a general crackdown on
groups considered to be "cults." Premier Wen Jiabao,
in his address to the NPC in March, stressed that
government agencies should strengthen their anti-cult
work. These "cults" included not only Falun Gong and
various traditional Chinese meditation and exercise
groups (known collectively as "qigong" groups) but
also religious groups that authorities accused of
preaching beliefs outside the bounds of officially
approved doctrine. Groups that the Government labeled
cults included Eastern Lightning, the Servants of
Three Classes, the Shouters, the South China Church,
the Association of Disciples, the Full Scope Church,
the Spirit Sect, the New Testament Church, the Way of
the Goddess of Mercy, the Lord God Sect, the
Established King Church, the Unification Church, and
the Family of Love. Authorities accused some in these
groups of lacking proper theological training,
preaching the imminent coming of the Apocalypse or
holy war, or exploiting the reemergence of religion
for personal gain. The Eastern Lightning group was
accused by the Government and some other unregistered
Christian groups of involvement in violence.
Actions against such groups continued during the year.
In April, over 100 members of the evangelical group
the "Servants of Three Classes" were detained in
Harbin, Heliongjiang Province. Most were released, but
Gu Xianggao died in custody, allegedly as a result of
beatings by police (see Section 1.c.) Police also
continued their efforts to close down an underground
evangelical group called the "Shouters," an offshoot
of a pre-1949 indigenous Protestant group. In 2001,
Gong Shengliang, founder of the South China Church,
was sentenced to death on criminal charges including
rape, arson, and assault. In 2002, an appeals court
overturned his death sentence, and Gong was sentenced
to life in prison. In the retrial, four women from his
congregation claimed that, prior to the first trial,
police had tortured them into signing statements
accusing Gong of raping them. The four women, who were
found not guilty of "cultist activity" in the retrial,
were nonetheless immediately sent to
reeducation-through-labor camps. In the retrial, the
court also dropped all "evil cult" charges against the
South China Church. During the year, elderly church
member Chen Jingmao reportedly was abused in prison
for attempting to convert inmates to Christianity.
The extent of public Falun Gong activity in the
country continued to decline considerably, and
practitioners based abroad reported that the
Government’s crackdown against the group continued.
Since the Government banned the Falun Gong in 1999,
the mere belief in the discipline (even without any
public manifestation of its tenets) was sufficient
grounds for practitioners to receive punishments
ranging from loss of employment to imprisonment.
Although the vast majority of the tens of thousands of
practitioners detained since 1999 have been released,
many were detained again after release (see Section
1.e.), and thousands reportedly remained in
reeducation-through-labor camps. Those identified by
the Government as "core leaders" have been singled out
for particularly harsh treatment. More than a dozen
Falun Gong members have been sentenced to prison for
the crime of "endangering state security," but the
great majority of Falun Gong members convicted by the
courts since 1999 have been sentenced to prison for
"organizing or using a sect to undermine the
implementation of the law," a less serious offense.
Most practitioners, however, were punished
administratively. In addition to being sentenced to
reeducation through labor, some Falun Gong members
were sent to detention facilities specifically
established to "rehabilitate" practitioners who
refused to recant their belief voluntarily after
release from reeducation-through-labor camps. In
addition, hundreds of Falun Gong practitioners have
been confined to mental hospitals (see Section 1.d.).
Police in the past often used excessive force when
detaining peaceful Falun Gong protesters. During the
year, allegations of abuse of Falun Gong practitioners
by the police and other security personnel continued.
According to the foreign-based Global Mission to
Rescue Persecuted Falun Gong Practitioners, 1,047
Falun Gong practitioners, including children and the
elderly, have died since 1997 as a result of official
persecution (see Section 1.c.). Other groups based
abroad estimated that as many as 2,000 practitioners
have died in custody.
During the 2003 SARS epidemic, the Government launched
new accusations that Falun Gong practitioners were
disrupting SARS-prevention efforts. State-run media
claimed that, beginning in April, Falun Gong followers
"incited public panic" and otherwise "sabotaged"
anti-SARS efforts in many provinces by preaching that
belief in Falun Gong will prevent persons from
contracting SARS. Authorities detained hundreds of
Falun Gong adherents on such charges, including 69 in
Jiangsu Province during May 2003 and 180 in Hebei
Province during June 2003, according to state-run
media. At year’s end, their whereabouts remained
unknown.
As recently as 2003, the Government continued its
effort to round up practitioners not already in
custody and sanctioned the use of high-pressure
tactics and mandatory anti-Falun Gong study sessions
to force practitioners to renounce Falun Gong. Even
practitioners who had not protested or made other
public demonstrations of belief reportedly were forced
to attend anti-Falun Gong classes or were sent
directly to reeducation-through-labor camps, where in
some cases, beatings and torture reportedly were used
to force them to recant. These tactics reportedly
resulted in large numbers of practitioners signing
pledges to renounce the movement.
The Government taught atheism in schools. While the
Government claimed that there were no national-level
regulations barring children from receiving religious
instruction, in some regions local authorities barred
persons under 18 from attending services at mosques,
temples, or churches.
For a more detailed discussion, see the 2004
International Religious Freedom Report.
d. Freedom of Movement within the Country, Foreign
Travel, Emigration and Repatriation
Although the Government maintained restrictions on the
freedom to change one's workplace or residence, the
national household registration and identification
card system continued to erode, and the ability of
most citizens to move within the country to work and
live continued to expand. However, the Government
retained the ability to restrict freedom of movement
through other mechanisms. Authorities heightened
restrictions periodically during the year,
particularly before politically sensitive
anniversaries and to forestall demonstrations.
The Government's "hukou" system of national household
registration underwent further liberalization during
the year, as the country responded to economic demands
for a more mobile labor force. Nonetheless, many
persons could not officially change their residence or
workplace within the country. Government and work unit
permission were often required before moving from city
to city. It was particularly difficult for peasants
from rural areas to obtain household registration in
some economically more developed urban areas. There
remained a "floating population" of between 100 and
150 million economic migrants who lacked official
residence status in cities. Without official residence
status, it was difficult or impossible to gain full
access to social services, including education.
Further, migrant workers were generally limited to
types of work considered least desirable by local
residents, and they had little recourse when subject
to abuse by employers and officials. In some major
cities, access to education for children of migrant
workers continued to improve during the year, and some
cities began to offer migrants some other social
services free of charge. Many cities and provinces
continued experiments aimed at abolishing the
distinction between urban and rural residents in
household registration documents, including Guangdong,
Jiangsu, Shandong, Anhui, Hebei, Hubei, and Sichuan
Provinces. However, other localities, including
Zhengzhou in Henan Province, re-established
registration requirements during the year to halt the
drain on public resources that had resulted from an
influx of migrants. In June 2003, the administrative
detention system of custody and repatriation applied
to migrants was abolished and replaced by a network of
aid shelters offering services to migrants, but it
remained unclear at year’s end how these reforms would
be implemented (see Section 1.d.).
Prior to sensitive anniversaries, authorities in urban
areas rounded up and detained some "undesirables,"
including the homeless, the unemployed, migrant
workers, those without proper residence or work
permits, petty criminals, prostitutes, and the
mentally ill or disabled. Dissidents reported that the
authorities restricted their freedom of movement
during politically sensitive periods and visits by
foreign dignitaries, including on some occasions
removing suspected dissidents from Beijing.
Under the "staying at prison employment" system
applicable to recidivists incarcerated in
reeducation-through-labor camps, authorities have
denied certain persons permission to return to their
homes after serving their sentences. Some released or
paroled prisoners returned home but were not permitted
freedom of movement. Former senior leaders Zhao Ziyang
and Bao Tong remained under house arrest in Beijing
for their role in the 1989 Tiananmen protests, and
security around them routinely was tightened during
sensitive periods.
The Government permitted legal emigration and foreign
travel for most citizens. Passports were increasingly
easy to obtain in most places, although those whom the
Government deemed to be threats, including religious
leaders, political dissidents, and some ethnic
minority members continued to have difficulty
obtaining passports (see Tibet Addendum). According to
media reports, more than 2.6 million mainland tourists
have traveled to Hong Kong since the Government
relaxed restrictions on such travel.
There were reports that some academics faced travel
restrictions around the year's sensitive
anniversaries, particularly the June 4 anniversary of
the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, and there were
instances in which the authorities refused to issue
passports or visas on apparent political grounds.
Members of underground churches sometimes were refused
passports and other necessary travel documents. Some
Falun Gong members also had difficulty in obtaining
passports. On June 1, Dr. Jiang Yanyong and his wife
were detained while en route to pick up a visa to
travel abroad to visit their daughter. They were held
for 7 and 2 weeks, respectively, because he wrote to
government leaders requesting an official reassessment
of the Tiananmen massacre. He was released in July,
but remained in a form of house arrest. Dr. Jiang also
was pressured not to accept the Ramon Magsaysay Award
for Public Service and was not permitted to travel to
a September awards ceremony in the Philippines.
Similarly, visas to enter the country were sometimes
denied for political reasons. For example, some
foreign academics who had been critical of the country
continued to be denied visas. Some others who intended
to discuss human rights or rule of law issues also
were denied visas. For foreigners whose business did
not raise political sensitivities, the Government
introduced a long-term residence permit during the
year.
The law neither provides for a citizen's right to
repatriate nor otherwise addresses exile. The
Government continued to refuse reentry to numerous
citizens whom it considered to be dissidents, Falun
Gong activists, or troublemakers. Although some
dissidents living abroad have been allowed to return,
dissidents released on medical parole and allowed to
leave the country often were effectively exiled.
Activists resident abroad have sometimes been
imprisoned upon their return to the country.
The Government's refusal to permit some former
reeducation-through-labor camp inmates to return to
their homes constituted a form of internal exile.
Although a signatory of the 1951 U.N. Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967
Protocol, the country has no laws or regulations that
authorize the authorities to grant refugee status. The
Government largely cooperated with the UNHCR when
dealing with the resettlement of ethnic Han Chinese or
ethnic minorities from Vietnam and Laos resident in
the country. During the year, the Government and UNHCR
continued ongoing discussions concerning the granting
of citizenship to these residents. Since the late
1980s, the Government has adopted a de facto policy of
tolerance toward the small number of persons, fewer
than 100 annually, from other nations who registered
with the Beijing office of the UNHCR as asylum
seekers. The Government permitted these persons to
remain in the country while the UNHCR made
determinations as to their status and, if the UNHCR
determined that they were bona fide refugees, while
they awaited resettlement in third countries. However,
the Government continued to deny the UNHCR permission
to operate along its northeastern border with North
Korea, arguing that North Koreans who crossed the
border were illegal economic migrants, not refugees.
During the year, several thousand North Koreans were
reportedly detained and forcibly returned to North
Korea, where many faced persecution and some of whom
may have been executed upon their return, as provided
in North Korean law. Several hundred North Koreans
were permitted to travel to Seoul after they had
entered diplomatic compounds or international schools
in China, and approximately 1,900 arrived in South
Korea via third countries such as Mongolia, Vietnam,
Thailand, and Cambodia, most after transiting through
China. There were numerous credible reports of
harassment and detention of North Koreans in the
country. The Government also arrested and detained
foreign journalists, missionaries and activists, as
well as some Chinese citizens, for providing food,
shelter, transportation, and other assistance to North
Koreans. According to NGOs, the Government reportedly
allowed North Korean security forces to enter China to
forcibly repatriate North Korean citizens during the
year.
While UNHCR reported that more than 2,000 Tibetans
each year continued to cross into Nepal, the
Government continued to try to prevent many Tibetans
from leaving (see Tibet Addendum).
In October 2003, the Government executed Uighur
Shaheer Ali after he and another Uighur were forcibly
returned to China in 2002 from Nepal, where they had
been granted refugee status by UNHCR (see Section 5).
Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of
Citizens to Change Their Government
Citizens lack the right to change their government
peacefully and cannot freely choose or change the laws
and officials that govern them. While recent reforms
allow citizens to elect members of village committees,
which are not considered to be government bodies, and
representatives to local people's congresses, the
Communist Party continued to control appointments to
positions of political power.
According to the Constitution, the National People's
Congress (NPC) is the highest organ of state power.
Formally, it elects the President and Vice President,
selects the Premier and Vice Premiers, and elects the
Chairman of the State Central Military Commission. In
practice, the NPC Standing Committee oversees these
elections and determines the agenda and procedure for
the NPC under the direct authority of the CCP's
Politburo Standing Committee. The NPC does not have
the power to set policy or remove Government or Party
leaders.
Under the 1987 Organic Law of Village Committees and
its 1998 amendments, all of the country's
approximately 1 million villages were expected to hold
competitive, direct elections for subgovernmental
village committees. Beginning in 1987, rural citizens
voted directly for their local village committees,
which were not considered government bodies. Most
provinces already have held four or five rounds of
village committee elections, according to the Ministry
of Civil Affairs. Foreign observers who have monitored
local village committee elections judged the elections
they observed, on the whole, to have been fair.
However, the Government estimated that one-third of
all elections had serious procedural flaws. Corruption
and interference by township level and Party officials
continued to be a problem in some cases.
The 1979 Election Law governs elections of legislative
bodies at all levels. Under this law, citizens have
the opportunity to vote for local people's congress
representatives at the county level and below,
although in most cases the nomination of candidates in
those elections was strictly controlled. People's
congress delegates above the county level are selected
by legislators at the level below. For example,
provincial-level people's congresses select delegates
to the NPC. Beginning in late 2002, a practice began
of naming local Communist Party secretaries to
concurrently serve as the head of the local people's
congress. This move dramatically strengthened Party
control over these legislatures.
Although the Party controls appointments of officials
to government and Party positions at all levels, some
township, county, and provincial elections featured
experiments with increased competition, including
self-nomination of candidates, campaign speeches by
candidates, public vetting of nominees, and a
two-tiered indirect election system. In October, the
Election Law was amended to permit preliminary
elections to establish the list of candidates for
direct elections in certain, limited situations.
The CCP retained a monopoly on political power and
forbade the creation of new political parties. The
Government continued efforts to suppress the China
Democracy Party (CDP), an opposition party that had
attracted hundreds of members nationwide within a few
months of its founding in 1998. Public security forces
had previously arrested nearly all of the CDP's
leaders: Xu Wenli, Wang Youcai, and Qin Yongmin were
sentenced in 1998 to prison terms of 13, 12, and 11
years, respectively. Xu Wenli and Wang Youcai were
released on medical parole to the United States in
December 2002 and March 2004, respectively, but Qin
remained in prison. At the time of the 16th Party
Congress in 2002, authorities targeted many remaining
activists for signing an open letter calling for
political reform and a reappraisal of the official
verdict on the 1989 Tiananmen massacre (see Section
1.d.). More than 40 current or former CDP members
remained imprisoned or held in
reeducation-through-labor camps during the year,
including Zhao Changqing, Sang Jiancheng, He Depu, Yao
Zhenxiang, Han Lifa, Dai Xuezhong, and Jiang Lijun. In
December, Zhejiang and Jiangsu Province activists were
interrogated and a few, including Yang Tianshui and
Wang Rongqing, were detained after they publicly
proposed that the NPC draft a political party law.
Freedom of information regulations were enacted in
many locations during the year, aimed at improving the
public's communication with and supervision over local
government initiatives. In Wuhan, freedom of
information regulations were used in August to force a
state-owned enterprise (SOE) to provide a laid-off
worker with information about SOE restructuring. In
July, a lawsuit was filed in Shanghai to force a local
land office to comply with a citizen's request for
information. The Government experimented with other
forms of public oversight of government, including
telephone hotlines and complaint centers,
administrative hearings, increased opportunity for
citizen observation of government proceedings, and
other forms of citizen input in the local legislative
process, such as hearings to discuss draft
legislation. For example, citizen feedback was an
important factor in selecting the site for a new
airport in Hubei Province. Most major cities have
introduced at least one of these mechanisms for
citizens to provide input and feedback on government
performance. The experiments have been generally
well-received by the public.
Corruption remained an endemic problem. According to
the Auditor General, embezzlement and misuse of public
funds affected 75 percent of commissions and
ministries under the State Council and accounted for
approximately $170 million (RMB 1.4 billion) missing
from the Central Government's 2003 budget.
Transparency International continued to rank China
among the worst countries in the world for bribery.
Economists estimated that the cost of corruption may
exceed 14 percent of gross domestic product.
The courts and Party agencies took disciplinary action
against some public and Party officials during the
year. According to the Supreme People's Procuratorate
(SPP), prosecutors at all levels in 2003 investigated
39,562 cases of abuse of official power involving
43,490 individuals. They prosecuted 22,761 cases
involving 26,124 individuals. From January to
November, prosecutors investigated 42,258 officials,
up one percent from 2003. During the 5-year period
ending in 2002, 83,308 public officials were convicted
for graft or bribery, a 65 percent increase over the
previous 5-year period, according to the Supreme
People's Court (SPC). In April 2003, the Minister of
Supervision reported that 860,000 corruption cases
were filed against Party members from 1997 to 2002,
resulting in more than 137,000 expulsions and
disciplinary action in more than 98 percent of cases.
The Party's Central Discipline and Inspection
Commission (CDIC) reported that 174,580 officials at
various levels were disciplined for breaking laws and
Party discipline in the period from December 2003 to
November 2004. Of those, 8,691 lost Party membership
and were prosecuted, according to state media reports.
In some cases, the CDIC reportedly acted as a
substitute for sanctions by the courts and other legal
agencies.
During the year, citizens seeking to petition the
Central Government for redress of grievances faced
harassment, detention, and incarceration. Tens of
thousands of citizens sought to redress grievances
through petitions to the Central Government. Among
them, Mao Hengfeng, a Shanghai housing activist and
organizer, was sentenced in April to 18 months in a
reeducation-through-labor facility for staging
"disorderly visits" to government offices in support
of her petition efforts. In August, two women were
sentenced to 3 years reeducation after they and four
others climbed atop a building near the central
Zhongnanhai compound and threatened to commit suicide
to protest the Government's neglect of their
petitions. In August, Beijing-based petitioner leader
Ye Guozhu was arrested for planning to hold a rally to
protest forced evictions. He was tried in November,
but the outcome of the trial was not available by
year's end.
During the year, Central Government officials stated
that provincial cadres would be evaluated, in part, on
the number of petitions to Beijing coming from their
provinces. This initiative aimed to improve
accountability by provincial officials and to
encourage them to resolve those complaints deemed
legitimate. While a few cases were favorably resolved,
most petitions languished. In some cases, provincial
officials of "Letters and Visits" offices and local
police pursued petitioners to Beijing and forcibly
returned them to their home provinces. Such detentions
often went unrecorded. In November 2003 and March
2004, Jiang Meili, the wife of imprisoned Shanghai
housing attorney Zheng Enchong, was pursued to
Beijing, abducted, and forced back to Shanghai by
local "Letters and Visits" officials. She was seeking
legal opinions from Beijing scholars and attorneys to
support her husband's appeal of a 2003 conviction for
"disclosing state secrets" in Shanghai housing
disputes. In Hebei Province's Tangshan County, over
11,000 people signed a petition protesting corruption
over land distribution and demanding recall of the
local party secretary. When petition leader Zhang
Youren carried the petition to Beijing in March, he
was detained and forced back to Tangshan, where he was
released. In July, Zhang was detained again. In the
period before a key Party meeting in September,
authorities rounded up thousands of the approximately
50,000 homeless petitioners living in temporary
shanties known as Beijing's "petitioners village."
Many were forcibly returned to their home provinces.
In December, Liaoning Province resident Qu Huiqian was
detained at the State Council complaints office in
Beijing while petitioning for her father's right to
free housing as a retired military official. According
to published reports, she was beaten unconscious by
local officials from Liaoning Province and left in a
ditch in Beijing. Hundreds of petitioners were also
reportedly detained in sports stadiums or forced back
to their home provinces at the time of the March NPC
session. Some were reportedly sent to psychiatric
facilities.
The Government placed no special restrictions on the
participation of women or minority groups in the
political process. However, women still held few
positions of significant influence at the highest
rungs of the Party or government structure. There was
one woman on the 24-member Politburo; she concurrently
held the only ministerial post (out of 28) occupied by
a woman. There was also one woman among the five State
Councilors. The head of a key Communist Party
organization, the United Front Work Department, was a
woman. In the country's 28 ministries, only 14 women
served at the level of vice minister or higher. Women
freely exercised their right to vote in village
committee elections, but only a small fraction of
elected members were women. As of the end of 2003,
there were 12.3 million female Party members, making
up over 18 percent of the 66.4 million members of the
Communist Party. Women constituted 20.2 percent of the
NPC and 13.2 percent of the NPC Standing Committee.
The 16th Party Congress in 2002 elected 27 women to
serve as members or alternates on the 198 person
Central Committee, a slight increase over the total of
the previous committee.
Minorities constituted 14 percent of the NPC, although
they made up approximately 9 percent of the
population. All of the country's 55 officially
recognized minority groups were represented in the NPC
membership. The 16th Party Congress elected 35 members
of ethnic minorities to serve as members or alternates
on the Central Committee and one ministerial-level
post was held by an ethnic minority. However,
minorities held few senior Party or government
positions of significant influence.
Section 4 Governmental Attitude Regarding
International and Nongovernmental Investigation of
Alleged Violations of Human Rights
The Government did not permit independent domestic
NGOs to monitor openly or to comment on human rights
conditions. It was difficult to establish an NGO, and
the Government tended to be suspicious of independent
organizations; most existing NGOs were
quasi-governmental in nature and were closely
controlled by government agencies (see Section 2.b.).
However, an informal network of dissidents in cities
around the country has become a credible source of
information about government actions taken against
activists. The information was disseminated outside of
the country through organizations such as the Hong
Kong-based Information Center for Human Rights and
Democratic Movement in China and the New York-based
Human Rights in China.
The press regularly printed articles about officials
who exceeded their authority and infringed on
citizens' rights. However, the Government remained
reluctant to accept criticism of its human rights
record by other nations or international organizations
and criticized reports by international human rights
monitoring groups, claiming that such reports were
inaccurate and interfered with the country's internal
affairs. Individuals were charged with and often
convicted of "disclosing state secrets" during the
year after passing information to human rights NGOs
based abroad (see Sections 1.c. and 2.a.). The
Government maintained that there were legitimate,
differing approaches to human rights based on each
country's particular history, culture, social
situation, and level of economic development. The
Government established the China Society for Human
Rights, a "nongovernmental" organization whose mandate
was not to monitor human rights conditions, but to
defend the Government's views and human rights record.
The Government had active human rights dialogues with
Australia, Canada, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Mexico,
Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the
European Union. In March, the Government announced
that it was suspending its human rights dialogue with
the United States in reaction to the U.S. decision to
table a resolution critical of the country's human
rights record at the U.N. Commission on Human Rights
2004 session. The U.S. did not agree to schedule a new
round of dialogue with China because of the lack of
sufficient concrete results from the last round, held
in December 2002. The Government also terminated some
legal reform cooperation with the United States and
U.S.-supported organizations.
The Government continued its unofficial dialogue on
human rights and prisoner issues with a San
Francisco-based human rights group. Visits by the
group's exective director, including a prison visit,
occurred during the year.
In September, members of the U.N. Working Group on
Arbitrary Detention visited Beijing, Sichuan Province,
and the TAR (see Section 1.d.). The Government agreed
to invite the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Torture and
the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance,
but those visits did not take place by year's end. The
Government also extended an invitation to the leaders
of the U.S. Commission on International Religious
Freedom, but the visit did not occur due to
restrictive conditions that the Government placed on
the visit.
Section 5 Discrimination, Societal Abuse, and
Trafficking in Persons
There were laws designed to protect women, children,
persons with disabilities, and minorities. However, in
practice, some societal discrimination based on
ethnicity, gender, and disability persisted.
Women
Violence against women was a significant problem.
There was no national law criminalizing domestic
violence, but Articles 43 and 45 of the Marriage Law
provide for mediation and administrative penalties in
cases of domestic violence. Over 30 provinces, cities,
or local jurisdictions have passed legislation
specifically to address domestic violence. According
to a survey by the All-China Women's Federation, 16
percent of women had been beaten by their husbands. In
2002, women's federations at all levels received
36,600 complaints about family violence, up nearly 40
percent over the previous year, while the number of
letters received complaining of family violence was
nearly 30,000, up nearly 30 percent. Two-thirds of
children were victims of family violence during their
lives, according to the China Society for Human
Rights. Actual figures were believed to be higher
because spousal abuse still went largely unreported.
According to experts, domestic abuse was more common
in rural areas than in urban centers. In response to
increased awareness of the problem of domestic
violence, there were a growing number of shelters for
victims. Rape is illegal, and some persons convicted
of rape were executed. The law does not expressly
recognize or exclude spousal rape.
The Central Government prohibits the use of physical
coercion to compel persons to submit to abortion or
sterilization. However, intense pressure to meet birth
limitation targets set by government regulations (see
Section 1.f.) has resulted in instances of local birth
planning officials reportedly using physical coercion
to meet government goals. In addition, women faced a
disproportionate burden due to the government's
enforcement of its birth limitation laws and
practices, which require the use of birth control
methods (particularly IUDs and female sterilization,
which according to government statistics accounted for
over 80 percent of birth control methods employed) and
the abortion of certain pregnancies.
According to expert estimates, there were 1.7 to 5
million commercial sex workers in the country. The
increased commercialization of sex and related
trafficking in women trapped thousands of women in a
cycle of crime and exploitation and left them
vulnerable to disease and abuse. According to the
official Xinhua News Agency, one in five massage
parlors in the country was involved in prostitution,
with the percentage higher in cities. A 2004 Guangdong
Province survey found that 74.2 percent of massage
parlor workers were involved in prostitution. Unsafe
working conditions were rampant among the saunas,
massage parlors, clubs, and hostess bars that have
sprung up in large cities. Research indicated that up
to 80 percent of prostitutes in some areas had
hepatitis. In light of this and, in particular, of the
growing threat of AIDS among sex workers, the U.N.
Convention on the Elimination of Discrimination
Against Women Committee in 1998 recommended that due
attention be paid to health services for female
prostitutes.
Although the Central Government and various provincial
and local governments have attempted to crack down on
the sex trade, there have been numerous credible
reports in the media of complicity in prostitution by
local officials. Actions to crack down on this
lucrative business, which involved organized crime
groups and businesspersons as well as the police and
the military, had limited results. In August, an
investigation of prostitution at entertainment
facilities in Guangdong Province led to the permanent
closure of 15 percent and temporary closure of another
40 percent of the facilities investigated, according
to state-run media. There have been instances in which
persons involved in organizing and procuring
prostitutes have been prosecuted.
No statute outlaws sexual harassment in the workplace,
and the law does not specifically define sexual
harassment. In 2003, Beijing courts accepted and
issued judgments in their first sexual harassment
cases. There was no reliable data about the extent of
sexual harassment, and the law did not specifically
define sexual harassment. Experts suggested that many
victims of sexual harassment did not report it out of
fear of losing their jobs, but awareness was growing.
State media reported that a television series on
sexual harassment aired on many channels.
The Government has made gender equality a policy
objective since 1949. The Constitution states that
"women enjoy equal rights with men in all spheres of
life." The Law on the Protection of Women's Rights and
Interests provides for equality in ownership of
property, inheritance rights, and access to education.
Policies that once allotted work unit housing only to
the husband in a couple have become gender-neutral,
and an April Supreme Court interpretation emphasized
that housing rights are shared equally, even in cases
of divorce. Nonetheless, many activists and observers
increasingly were concerned that the progress that has
been made by women over the past 50 years was being
eroded. They asserted that the Government appeared to
have made the pursuit of gender equality a secondary
priority as it focused on economic reform and
political stability.
The Law on the Protection of Women's Rights and
Interests was designed to assist in curbing
gender-based discrimination. However, women continued
to report that discrimination, sexual harassment,
unfair dismissal, demotion, and wage discrepancies
were significant problems. Efforts have been made by
social organizations as well as by the Government to
educate women about their legal rights, and there was
anecdotal evidence that women increasingly were using
laws to protect their rights.
Women's networks, involving lawyers, activists, and
the press, were active in Beijing, Shanghai, and other
cities, highlighting problems and calling for
solutions to gender-based discrimination.
Nevertheless, women frequently encountered serious
obstacles to the enforcement of laws. According to
legal experts, it was very hard to litigate a sex
discrimination suit because the vague legal definition
made it difficult to quantify damages. As a result,
very few cases were brought to court. Some observers
also noted that the agencies tasked with protecting
women's rights tended to focus on maternity-related
benefits and wrongful termination during maternity
leave rather than on sex discrimination, violence
against women, and sexual harassment.
The All China Women's Federation reported that 47
percent of laid-off workers were women, a percentage
significantly higher than their representation in the
labor force. Many employers preferred to hire men to
avoid the expense of maternity leave and childcare,
and some even lowered the effective retirement age for
female workers to 40 years of age (the official
retirement age for men was 60 years and for women 55
years). Lower retirement ages also had the effect of
reducing pensions, which generally were based on years
worked. Some employers required that women be below
the age of 30 to qualify for certain jobs.
The law provides for equal pay for equal work.
However, a 1999 Government survey found that urban
women were paid only 70.1 percent of what men received
for the same work, while women in rural areas received
only 59.6 percent of male peasants' incomes. Average
incomes of female executives and senior professionals
were only 57.9 percent and 68.3 percent of their male
colleagues' salaries. Women have borne the brunt of
the economic reform of state owned enterprises. Most
women employed in industry worked in lower skilled and
lower paid jobs and in sectors, such as textiles,
which were particularly vulnerable to restructuring
and layoffs. Women accounted for 60 percent of those
below the poverty line in the country.
UNESCO reported during the year that less than 2
percent of women between the ages of 15-24 were
illiterate, adding that 15 percent of women 15 years
and older were illiterate. The female illiteracy rate
was double that for men. Official government
statistics claimed that the illiteracy rate among
women ages 15-40 was 4.2 percent.
A high female suicide rate continued to be a serious
problem. Many observers believed that violence against
women and girls, discrimination in education and
employment, the traditional preference for male
children, the country's birth limitation policies, and
other societal factors contributed to the especially
high female suicide rate.
While the gap in the education levels of men and women
was narrowing, men continued to constitute a
disproportionate number of the relatively small
percentage of the population that received a
university-level education. According to figures
released by the All-China Women's Federation, in 2002
women made up 44.0 percent of university students and
46.7 percent of all high school students. However,
women with advanced degrees reported an increase in
discrimination in the hiring process as the job
distribution system opened up and became more
competitive and market driven. According to Government
statistics, 98.5 percent of girls nationwide were
enrolled in elementary school, but it was widely
believed that the proportion of girls attending school
in rural and minority areas was far smaller than in
cities.
Children
The Constitution prohibits maltreatment of children
and provides for compulsory education. The country has
outlawed child labor and trafficking in children, but
serious problems in those areas persisted.
The Constitution provides for 9 years of compulsory
education for children, but in economically
disadvantaged rural areas, many children did not
attend school for the required period and some never
attend. Public schools were not allowed to charge
tuition, but after the Central Government largely
stopped subsidizing primary education in the early
1990s, many public schools began to charge mandatory
fees to meet revenue shortfalls. Such fees made it
difficult for poorer families to send their children
to school or to send them on a regular basis. Some
charitable schools have opened in recent years in
rural areas, but not enough to meet demand. Children
of migrant workers in urban areas also often had
difficulty attending school. For these families,
excessive school fees were a significant problem. The
Government campaign for universal primary school
enrollment by 2000 (which was not met) helped to
increase enrollment in some areas. It also reportedly
led some school officials to inflate the number of
children actually enrolled.
In 2003, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on the Right to
Education visited the country. Following the visit,
the Special Rapporteur reported that the Government
failed to provide education to many children of
migrant workers and prohibited children from receiving
religious education. The Special Rapporteur expressed
serious concern about the recent privatization of the
costs of public education, reporting that the
Government compels parents to pay nearly half the
costs of public education, making education
inaccessible to many children. The Special Rapporteur
also recommended the immediate prohibition of the
practice of children performing manual labor at their
schools to raise funds.
An extensive health care delivery system has led to
improved child health and a continued decline in
infant mortality rates. According to the 2000 Census,
the infant mortality rate was 28.4 per 1,000.
According to UNICEF statistics, the mortality rate for
children under 5 years of age was 37 per 1,000 live
births. The Law on the Protection of Juveniles forbids
infanticide; however, there was evidence that the
practice continued. According to the National
Population and Family Planning Commission, only a
handful of doctors have been charged with infanticide
under this law. The law prohibits discrimination
against disabled minors and codifies a variety of
judicial protections for juvenile offenders. The
physical abuse of children can be grounds for criminal
prosecution.
Despite government efforts to prevent kidnapping and
the buying and selling of children, these problems
persisted in some rural areas, and children also were
trafficked for labor purposes (see Section 5,
Trafficking).
In 2004, Guangzhou and Chengdu cities established the
country's first specialized juvenile courts designed
to protect minors' rights and interests. Authorities
arrested 69,780 juveniles in 2003 and approximately
19,000 juveniles were incarcerated in formal prisons.
Abolition of the system of custody and repatriation in
2003 (see Section 1.c.) reduced the number of children
detained administratively. Nonetheless, more than
150,000 homeless "street children" lived in cities,
according to state-run media. Many did not live with
their parents and survived by begging. Juveniles were
required by law to be held separately from adults
except when facilities were insufficient. In practice,
children sometimes were detained without their
parents, held with adults, and required to work (see
Sections 1.d. and 6.c.).
In 2003, 3-year-old Li Siyi starved to death at home
in Chengdu, Sichuan Province, after police detained
her mother for stealing two bottles of shampoo and
reportedly ignored the mother's pleas to check on the
girl. On August 19, two police officers were convicted
of dereliction of duty in the case and sentenced to 2
and 3 years in prison.
Female infanticide, sex-selective abortions, and the
abandonment and neglect of baby girls remained
problems due to the traditional preference for sons
and the birth limitation policy (see Section 1.f.).
Many families, particularly in rural areas, used
ultrasound to identify female fetuses and terminate
pregnancies. An official study in Hainan Province
found that 68 percent of abortions were of female
fetuses. In a 2002 survey, 35 percent of women in one
rural township admitting to having an abortion because
of preference for a male child. Official figures from
November 2000 put the overall male-female sex ratio at
birth at 116.9 to 100 (as compared to the statistical
norm of 106 to 100). For second births, the ratio was
151.9 to 100. Female babies also suffered from a
higher mortality rate than male babies, contrary to
the worldwide trend. State media reported that infant
mortality rates in rural areas were 27 percent higher
for girls than boys. Neglect of baby girls was one
factor in their lower survival rate. One study found
the differential mortality rates were highest in areas
where women had a lower social status and economic and
medical conditions were poor.
The Law on the Protection of Juveniles forbids the
mistreatment or abandonment of children. According to
the latest available figures, compiled in 1994, the
number of children abandoned annually was
approximately 1.7 million, and the number may have
grown over the subsequent decade despite the fact
that, under the law, child abandonment is punishable
by a fine and a 5-year prison term. The vast majority
of children in orphanages were female, although some
were males who were either disabled or in poor health.
Medical professionals frequently advised parents of
children with disabilities to put the children into
orphanages.
The Government denied that children in orphanages were
mistreated or refused medical care but acknowledged
that the system often was unable to provide adequately
for some children, particularly those with serious
medical problems. A 1997 revision of the adoption law
made it easier for couples to adopt. However, adopted
children were counted under the birth limitation
regulations in most locations. As a result, couples
who adopted abandoned baby girls, for example, were
sometimes barred from having additional children.
Trafficking in Persons
The law prohibits trafficking in women and children;
however, trafficking in persons and the abduction of
women for trafficking remained serious problems. The
country was both a source and destination country for
trafficking in persons. Most trafficking was internal
for the purpose of providing lower middle income
farmers with brides or sons. Some cases involved
trafficking of women and girls into forced
prostitution in urban areas, and some reports
suggested that certain victims, particularly children,
were sold into forced labor.
Internal trafficking was a significant problem. The
Ministry of Public Security estimated that at least
9,000 women and 1,000 children were kidnapped and sold
illegally each year.
Some experts suggested that the demand for abducted
women was fueled by the shortage of marriageable
brides, particularly in rural areas. The serious
imbalance in the male-female sex ratio at birth, the
tendency for many village women to leave rural areas
to seek employment, and the cost of traditional
betrothal gifts all made purchasing a bride attractive
to some poor rural families. Some families recruited
brides from economically less advanced areas. Others
sought help from criminal gangs, which either
kidnapped women and girls or tricked them by promising
them jobs and an easier way of life and then
transporting them far from their home areas for
delivery to buyers. Once in their new "family," these
women were "married" and raped. Some accepted their
fate and joined the new community; others struggled
and were punished.
There were reports that women and girls from Burma,
Laos, North Korea, Vietnam, and Russia were trafficked
into the country either to work in the sex trade or to
be forced to marry Chinese men. Past reports noted
that trafficking of North Korean women and girls into
the country to work in the sex industry was reportedly
widespread in the northeastern part of the country,
but reliable sources suggested that the practice has
decreased. According to press reports, North Korean
brides were sold for approximately $38 to $150 (RMB
315 to RMB 1,245). Women reportedly also were
trafficked from Vietnam into the country for the
purpose of forced marriage.
Citizens were trafficked from the country for sexual
exploitation and indentured servitude in domestic
service, sweatshops, restaurants, and other services.
There were reports that citizens were trafficked to
Australia, Belgium, Burma, Canada, Hungary, Italy,
Japan (illegal immigrants held in debt bondage),
Malaysia, the Netherlands (for the purpose of sexual
exploitation), Singapore, Sri Lanka (for sexual
exploitation), Taiwan, the United Kingdom (for sexual
exploitation), and the United States.
At times, trafficked persons became entangled with
alien smuggling rings, which often had ties to
organized crime and were international in scope.
Persons trafficked by alien smugglers paid high prices
for their passage to other countries, where they hoped
that their economic prospects would improve. There
were credible reports that some promised to pay from
$30,000 to $50,000 (RMB 248,000 to 415,000) each for
their passage. Upon arrival, many reportedly were
forced to repay the traffickers for the smuggling
charges by working in specified jobs for a set period
of time. They often also were forced to pay charges
for living expenses out of their meager earnings. The
conditions under which these trafficked persons had to
live and work were generally poor, and they were often
required to work long hours. The smuggling rings that
trafficked them often restricted their movements and
confiscated their often fraudulent travel documents.
Victims of trafficking faced threats of being turned
in to the authorities as illegal immigrants and
threats of retaliation against their families at home
if they protested the situation in which they found
themselves. Persons who were trafficked from the
country and then repatriated sometimes faced fines for
illegal immigration upon their return; after a second
repatriation, such persons could be sentenced to
reeducation through labor. Alien smugglers were fined
$6,000 (RMB 49,600), and most were sentenced to up to
3 years in prison; some have been sentenced to death.
Kidnapping and the buying and selling of children
continued to occur, particularly in poorer rural
areas. There were no reliable estimates of the number
of children trafficked. Domestically, most trafficked
children were sold to couples unable to have children;
in particular, boys were trafficked to couples unable
to have a son. During the year, media reported arrests
in the case of 76 baby boys sold in Hohhot, Inner
Mongolia, and a case of 200 children, mostly boys, who
were kidnapped in Kunming, Yunnan Province. However,
baby girls also were trafficked. During the year, 52
people were convicted in a March 2003 case in which 28
girls were found packed in suitcases on a bus from
Yulin, Guangxi Province. The babies were purchased in
Yulin for $24 (RMB 200) to be resold for $240 to $360
(RMB 1992 to RMB 2988) to families in Anhui and Henan
Provinces to work or serve as child brides. The oldest
was 5 months of age; one baby died en route. Two
leaders of the ring were sentenced to death. Children
were also trafficked for labor purposes. Children
trafficked to work usually were sent from poorer
interior areas to relatively more prosperous areas;
traffickers reportedly often enticed parents to
relinquish their children with promises of large
remittances that their children would be able to send
to them.
The purchase of women was not criminalized until 1991,
with the enactment of the NPC Standing Committee's
"Decision Relating to the Severe Punishment of
Criminal Elements Who Abduct and Kidnap Women and
Children." This decision made abduction and sale
separate offenses.
Arrests of traffickers have decreased from the peak in
2000, when a nationwide crackdown was initiated. That
year, more than 19,000 persons were arrested and more
than 11,000 were sentenced to punishments, including,
in a few cases, the death penalty. In May, two men
were sentenced to death in Yunnan Province after being
convicted of trafficking 22 women to Guangdong
Province and forcing them into prostitution. According
to official media reports, from 2001 to 2003, police
freed more than 42,000 kidnapped women and children.
More than 22,000 suspects were arrested, and police
solved 20,360 cases involving kidnapped women and
children. Official statistics indicate that during the
year authorities registered 3,343 cases involving
trafficking of women and children (a 76.2 percent
increase from 2002); uncovered 2,966 new cases of
trafficking (an 87.1 percent increase from 2002); and
rescued a total of 8,949 trafficked women and children
(an 18.7 percent decrease from 2002). During the year,
5,043 suspects were arrested, and 3,144 were referred
for prosecution. In Guangdong Province alone, 68
prosecutions were undertaken against traffickers from
2002 to June 2004 and officials rescued more than 100
children.
Despite government efforts to eliminate trafficking in
women and children, the problem persisted. Demand far
outstripped the available supply, making trafficking a
profitable enterprise for those willing to risk arrest
and prosecution. The Government also continued to
struggle with the pervasive problem of official
corruption (see Section 3). There were reports of
complicity of local officials in the related problem
of alien smuggling, as well as reports of the
complicity of local officials in prostitution, which
sometimes involved trafficked women. Hong Kong-based
media reported in November that a Guangdong police
official was arrested after allegedly providing
thousands of visas to prostitutes traveling to Hong
Kong and Macao, some of whom had reportedly never been
to the place of visa issuance. In some cases, village
leaders sought to prevent police from rescuing women
who had been sold as brides to villagers.
Agencies involved in combating trafficking included
the MPS, the SPC, the SPP, the Ministry of Civil
Affairs, the Central Office in Charge of Comprehensive
Management of Public Order, and the Legislative Office
of the State Council. It was Central Government policy
to provide funds to provincial and local police to
house victims and return them to their homes.
Government-funded women's federation offices provided
counseling on legal rights, including the options for
legal action against traffickers, to some victims. The
All-China Women's Federation assisted Chinese victims
in obtaining medical and psychological treatment.
Persons With Disabilities
The law protects the rights of persons with
disabilities; however, the reality for persons with
disabilities lagged far behind legal dictates, and
many did not receive or have access to special
assistance or to programs designed to assist them.
According to the official press, all local governments
have drafted specific measures to implement the law.
As attention began to focus on the Special Olympics
and Paralympics to be held in the country in 2007-08,
the press increasingly publicized the plight of
persons with disabilities and the Government's efforts
to assist them. State media reported that the
Government increased its planned 2004 spending on
infrastructure improvements for persons with
disabilities to approximately $15.75 million, up from
$12.5 million in 2003. The Government, at times in
conjunction with NGOs such as the Lions Club
International or the Special Olympics, sponsored a
wide range of preventive and rehabilitative programs.
For example, several thousand blind persons have been
trained in therapeutic massage. The goal of many of
these programs was to allow persons with disabilities
to be integrated into society. However, misdiagnosis,
inadequate medical care, pariah status, and
abandonment remained common problems.
According to reports, doctors frequently persuaded
parents of children with disabilities to place their
children in large government-run institutions, often
far from the parents, and in which care was often
seriously inadequate. Those parents who chose to keep
children with disabilities at home generally faced
difficulty in getting adequate medical care, day care,
and education for their children. Government
statistics showed that almost one quarter of the
approximately 60 million persons with disabilities
lived in extreme poverty. Unemployment among adults
with disabilities remained a serious problem. The
Government's official strategy was to integrate
persons with disabilities into the mainstream work
force, but efforts to do so were limited and
confronted a cultural legacy of discrimination and
neglect. Standards adopted for making roads and
buildings accessible to persons with disabilities were
subject to the Law on the Handicapped, which calls for
their "gradual" implementation; compliance with the
law was lax. Students with disabilities were
discriminated against in access to education. The
Higher Education Law permits universities legally to
exclude candidates for higher education who have
disabilities.
The Maternal and Child Health Care Law forbids the
marriage of persons with certain specified contagious
diseases or certain acute mental illnesses such as
schizophrenia. If doctors find that a couple is at
risk of transmitting disabling congenital defects to
their children, the couple may marry only if they
agree to use birth control or undergo sterilization.
The Population and Family Planning Law requires local
governments to employ such practices to raise the
percentage of healthy births.
National/Racial/Ethnic Minorities
According to the 2000 census, the total population of
the country's 55 officially recognized ethnic
minorities was 106.4 million, or 8.4 percent of the
total population. In addition to these 55 ethnic
minorities and the dominant Han ethnic group, some
citizens identified themselves as members of
unrecognized ethnic minorities. Most minority groups
resided in the areas they traditionally have
inhabited. The Government's avowed policy on
minorities calls for preferential treatment in
marriage regulations, birth planning, university
admission, and employment. Programs have been
established to provide low interest loans, subsidies,
and special development funds for minority areas.
Nonetheless, in practice, minorities faced
discrimination by the majority Han culture. Most of
the minorities in border regions were less educated
than the national average, and job discrimination in
favor of Han migrants remained a serious problem.
Racial discrimination was the source of deep
resentment by minorities in some areas, such as
Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Tibetan areas. For
example, ethnic Uighurs in Xinjiang did not have equal
access to newly created construction jobs associated
with development projects; Han workers were brought in
from Sichuan and elsewhere to work, particularly on
technical projects such as oil and gas pipelines. The
Government did not openly recognize racism against
minorities or tension among different ethnic groups as
problems.
Government development policies have long been in
place to improve minority living standards. However,
while overall standards of living for those in
minority areas have improved as a result of these
policies, real incomes in minority areas, particularly
for minorities, remained well below those in other
parts of the country. The majority Han Chinese have
benefited disproportionately from government programs
and economic growth, even in minority areas. Many
development programs have disrupted traditional living
patterns of minority groups, and have included, in
some cases, the forced evacuation of persons (see
Section 2.d.).
Since 1949, government policy has resulted in a
significant migration of Han Chinese to Xinjiang.
According to a Government White Paper released in
2003, approximately 8.25 million of Xinjiang's 19.25
million official residents were Han Chinese, up from
300,000 Han in 1949. Approximately 8 million Xinjiang
residents were Uighurs. Signficant numbers of Kazakhs,
Hui, Tajiks, and other minorities also lived in
Xinjiang. Official statistics underestimated the Han
population of Xinjiang because the Government did not
count as part of the official population the thousands
of Han who were long-term "temporary workers." The
migration of ethnic Han into Xinjiang in recent
decades has caused the Han-Uighur ratio in the capital
of Urumqi to shift from 20:80 to 80:20 and was a
source of Uighur resentment. According to the 2000
census, non-Tibetan residents of the TAR comprised 6
percent of the population, but that figure did not
include a large number of long-term Han residents.
Their presence caused resentment among some Tibetans
(see Tibet Addendum).
In many areas with a significant population of
minorities, there were two-track school systems that
used either standard Chinese or the local minority
language. Students could choose to attend schools in
either system. However, graduates of minority language
schools typically needed 1 year or more of intensive
Chinese before they could handle course work at a
Chinese language university. Despite the Government's
efforts to provide schooling in minority languages,
the dominant position of standard Chinese in
government, commerce, and academia put graduates of
minority schools who lacked standard Chinese
proficiency at a disadvantage. The vast majority of
Uighur children in Xinjiang attended Uighur-language
schools and generally received an hour's Chinese
language instruction per day. During the year, the
government allocated an additional US$9 million (RMB
74.25 million) to promote Chinese-language instruction
in Xinjiang.
The CCP has an avowed policy of boosting minority
representation in the Government and the CCP, and
minorities constituted 14 percent of the NPC, which
was higher than their percentage in the population. A
1999 government white paper reported that there were
2.7 million minority officials in the Government. The
2003 Government White Paper states that there are
348,000 minority cadres in Xinjiang, accounting for
51.8 percent of all Party members in the autonomous
region. Many members of minorities occupied local
leadership positions, but few held positions of
influence in the local Party apparatus or at the
national level. For example, 63 percent of Xinjiang's
deputies to the NPC were ethnic minorities. However,
in most areas, ethnic minorities were shut out of
positions of real political and economic power, which
fed their resentment of Han officials holding the most
powerful Party positions in minority autonomous
regions.
Tensions between ethnic Han citizens and Uighurs in
Xinjiang continued, and the authorities continued to
restrict political, civil, and religious freedoms (see
Section 2.c.) in the region. A campaign that began in
1997 to stress unity and to condemn "splittism" and
religious extremism showed no signs of abating. During
the year, authorities continued to prohibit activities
they deemed separatist in nature, announced tightened
security measures, and mounted campaigns to crack down
on opposition.
The campaign against separatism in Xinjiang
specifically targeted the "three evils" of extremism,
splittism, and terrorism as the major threats to
Xinjiang's social stability. Because the Government
authorities in Xinjiang regularly grouped together
those involved in "ethnic separatism, illegal
religious activities, and violent terrorism," it was
often unclear whether particular raids, detentions, or
judicial punishments targeted those peacefully seeking
to express their political or religious views or those
engaged in violence. Many observers raised concerns
that the Government's war on terror was being used as
a pretext for cracking down harshly on Uighurs
expressing peaceful political dissent and on
independent Muslim religious leaders. In December
2003, the Government published an "East Turkestan
Terrorist List," which labelled organizations such as
the World Uighur Youth Congress and the East Turkestan
Information Center as terrorist entities. These groups
openly advocated East Turkestan independence, but with
the exception of one group, the East Turkestan Islamic
Movement (ETIM), there was no available evidence that
they advocated violence to achieve this goal. The U.N.
has designated ETIM a terrorist organization.
Uighurs were sentenced to long prison terms and
sometimes executed during the year on charges of
separatism. During the strike-hard campaign, which
officially concluded in 2003, authorities stated they
prosecuted more than 3,000 cases in Xinjiang and held
mass sentencing rallies attended by more than 300,000
persons. By its own account, the Government broke up
22 groups engaged in what it claimed were separatist
and terrorist activities and meted out 50 death
sentences to those charged with separatist acts from
January to August. In July, two Muslim Uighurs
reportedly were executed after being convicted in Aksu
City, Xinjiang, of illegally organizing the East
Turkestan People's Party and using armed tactics to
split the country. Approximately 15 others were
convicted of separatism and sentenced to long prison
terms in the same case. In October 2003, Uighur
Shaheer Ali was executed after being convicted of
terrorism. He had been repatriated forcibly from Nepal
in 2002, where he had been interviewed by the UNHCR
and granted refugee status.
For many Uighurs, the ongoing imprisonment of Uighur
businesswoman Rebiya Kadeer symbolized the
Government's mistreatment of Uighurs. In 2000, a
Xinjiang court sentenced Kadeer, a former member of
the provincial-level Chinese People's Political
Consultative Conference, to 8 years in prison on
charges of "passing state intelligence" to foreigners;
according to an official press report, the
intelligence she was accused of passing included
newspaper articles and a list of names of persons
whose cases had been handled by the courts. Kadeer,
her son, and her secretary were arrested in 1999 while
on their way to meet a visiting foreign delegation.
Kadeer reportedly suffered various health problems in
prison. Some foreign observers believed Kadeer was
singled out for her activism on behalf of Uighurs and
for her husband's involvement with Uighur causes and
Radio Free Asia. In March, Kadeer received a 1-year
sentence reduction for good behavior. The Government
claimed she had recognized that she was a victim of
"splittism" and remained "on the side of the Party and
the people." She was due for release in August 2006.
On October 18, Uighur Dilkex Tilivaldi was detained
after meeting a foreign journalist, and his
whereabouts continued to be unknown.
Other Uighurs whose work emphasized pride in cultural
identity have also been harassed and detained by the
Government. Writer and translator Abdulghani Memetemin
was convicted in June 2003 on charges of sending state
secrets abroad and sentenced to 9 years in prison for
translating news articles into Chinese from the Uighur
language and forwarding official speeches to the East
Turkestan Information Center. In late 2001, the U.N.
Working Group on Arbitary Detention ruled that Uighur
scholar and researcher of Xinjiang's ethnic minorities
Tohti Tunyaz had been arbitrarily detained. He was
sentenced in 1999 to an 11-year prison term for
"inciting separatism" and "illegally acquiring state
secrets" and remained in prison at year’s end.
Possession of publications or audiovisual materials
discussing independence or other sensitive subjects
was not permitted, and, according to reports,
possession of such materials resulted in lengthy
prison sentences.
Officials in the region claimed that the campaign
against separatism was necessary to maintain public
order. In March, Xinjiang's chairman Ismail Tiliwaldi
said the campaign had improved security, noting in
published reports that, since the start of 2003, there
were no explosions or assassinations in the region and
no tourists were killed in Xinjiang.
Han control of the region's political and economic
institutions also contributed to heightened tension.
Although government policies brought tangible economic
improvements to Xinjiang, Han residents have received
a disproportionate share of the benefits. The majority
of Uighurs were poor farmers, and 25 percent were
illiterate. Regulations require Uighurs to use
Mandarin Chinese characters for their names on
identification documents.
In July, Guizhou University Law School dean Yuan
Hongbing and former colleague Zhao Jing applied for
asylum during a business trip to Australia. Yuan, an
ethnic Mongolian who had been arrested in 1994 for
dissident writings and political organizing, stated
that he had decided to remain in Australia in order to
publish his writings on the situation of ethnic
Mongolians and Tibetans. Inner Mongolian cultural
activist Hada also continued to serve a 15-year
sentence during the year.
In October, violence erupted near Zhongmou Township in
Henan Province after an ethnic Hui taxi driver struck
and killed a 6-year-old Han girl. Ethnic reciminations
followed involving Han and Hui from several villages.
In the end, dozens from both ethnic groups were killed
or wounded. The Government closed Zhongmou to
outsiders for several weeks and imposed a ban on
domestic and foreign news reporting about the
incident. Farmers' rights advocate Li Guozhu was
detained in November after visiting the area,
interviewing locals about the violence, and allegedly
relaying his findings to foreign journalists.
Other Societal Abuses and Discrimination
No laws criminalize private homosexual activity
between consenting adults. The 1997 criminal code
abolished the crime of "hooliganism," which had
previously been used to prosecute gay men and
lesbians. In 2001, medical authorities removed
homosexuality from the national diagnostic handbook of
psychiatric disorders. In May, prohibitions on
homosexuality were dropped from regulations governing
the behavior of individuals serving sentences. In
July, the country's delegation to the 15th annual AIDS
Conference in Bangkok, Thailand, included
representatives of an NGO advocating gay rights. Gay
men and lesbians stated that official tolerance has
improved in recent years. However, societal
discrimination and strong pressure to conform to
family expectations deter most individuals from
publicly discussing their sexual orientation.
During the year, the Government officially outlawed
discrimination against persons with HIV/AIDS and
Hepatitis B under a new Contagious Disease Law and
adopted regulations forbidding employment
discrimination against persons with HIV/AIDS and
Hepatitis B. However, discrimination against persons
with HIV/AIDS remained widespread in many areas.
Hospitals and physicians often refused to treat
HIV-positive patients.
In February, the Government created the State Council
AIDS office, putting policy formation regarding the
AIDS issue at the highest Government level. The
Government also introduced the China CARES Program,
the goal of which was to provide care and treatment to
60,000 poor, rural people with HIV/AIDS. The program
began in 51 pilot counties in April and added an
additional 76 counties in June. The day before World
AIDS Day, President Hu Jintao publicly shook hands
with an AIDS patient and spoke about the need for the
country to address the disease candidly without
stigma. Regulations were also revised to permit, for
the first time, those with HIV/AIDS and Hepatitis B to
work as civil servants.
Information about the number of HIV/AIDS cases in the
country remained difficult to gather and assess.
Officials acknowledged that over 1 million citizens
were infected with HIV, although the Government had
not updated its official estimate of 840,000 persons
infected.
Activist Li Dan was beaten and Pan Zhongfeng detained
in Shangqiu, Henan Province, during a July
demonstration protesting closure of an AIDS orphanage
and school. Henan Province activists Wang Guofeng and
Li Suzhi claimed they received inadequate treatment
while detained and that authorities refused to provide
them with test results or allow them to travel to
Beijing to see specialists after they were released on
bail (see Section 1.c.).
Section 6 Worker Rights
a. The Right of Association
The Constitution provides for freedom of association.
However, in practice, workers were not free to
organize or join unions of their own choosing. The
All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU), which
was controlled by the Communist Party and headed by a
high-level Party official, was the sole legal workers'
organization. The Trade Union Law gives the ACFTU
control over the establishment and operation of all
subsidiary union organizations and activities
throughout the country, including enterprise-level
unions. The Trade Union Law also allows workers to
decide whether to join official unions in their
enterprises. There were no reports of repercussions
for the small percentage of workers in the state-owned
sector that had not joined. Independent unions are
illegal.
Although the ACFTU and its constituent unions had a
monopoly on trade union activity, their influence over
the workplace diminished with the economic reforms of
recent years. ACFTU unions were relatively powerless
to protect the tens of millions of members who have
lost their jobs or had their wages or benefits delayed
or cut in the massive restructuring of state-owned
enterprises (SOEs), although, at the national level,
the ACFTU may provide policy input on these issues.
The unions have also provided some benefits and
reemployment assistance to affected workers. The ACFTU
had difficulty organizing in the country's rapidly
growing private and foreign-invested sectors, where
union membership during the year was estimated to be
less than 20 percent. With declines in the state-owned
sector and organizational weakness outside the state
sector, the ACFTU's membership declined from nearly
100 percent of the urban workforce during the height
of the planned economy to approximately 50 percent in
recent years. The ACFTU reported a membership of 130
million at the end of 2003, out of an estimated 256
million urban workers.
The existence of an enormous rural labor force, some
490 million out of a total labor force of
approximately 750 million, also complicated the
organization and protection of workers. Farmers did
not have a union or any other similar organization. Of
some 130 million rural residents working in township
and village enterprises, only a very small percentage
were represented by unions. A "floating" migrant labor
force of over 100 to 150 million persons has proven
especially difficult to organize and protect, although
state-run media reported that the ACFTU had stepped up
a campaign to bring migrant workers into the union and
that community unions for migrants had been
established in a number of cities. Some migrants
gravitated to temporary or seasonal low-wage work in
urban areas where their household was not registered
under the country's "hukou" system (see Section 2.d.).
Many migrants, including substantial numbers of young
women, were attracted to the growing private sector
where unions were few and where their desire to earn
more than they could in rural areas made them easy to
exploit.
The ACFTU has shown some interest in adapting its
organization to the needs of labor in a market
economy. Local ACFTU federations have allowed a few
limited experiments in more open union elections and
decision-making. These included freely electing, by
secret ballot, the leadership of ACFTU affiliated
unions at several foreign-owned factories in Guangdong
and Fujian Provinces in 2002 and 2003, although no new
elections were reported during the year. At the
national level, the ACFTU has had input into shaping
the country's system of labor laws and regulations. In
particular, the ACFTU actively pushed amendments to
the Trade Union Law, passed in 2001, that give greater
protection to union organizing efforts and legitimize
union activity in the private sector, including
foreign-invested enterprises, and will now allow
migrant workers to become union members. In September,
the ACFTU revised its Constitution to provide that the
union's basic responsibility is to safeguard workers'
legitimate rights and interests. Despite the ACFTU's
stated goals to organize these new groups of workers,
there had been very limited gains as of year's end.
During the year, the Government took specific actions
against illegal union activity, including the
detention and arrest of labor activists. In April,
Chen Kehai and Zhao Yong, workers from the Tieshu
Textile Factory in Suizhou, Hubei Province, were tried
under summary proceedings and convicted on charges of
disturbing public order for their involvement with a
labor protest at the factory. A third worker, Zhu Guo,
reportedly was tried and convicted on charges of
assembling a crowd to disturb social order. Four other
Tieshu workers were sentenced to reeducation through
labor (see Section 2.b.).
Other labor activists, detained in previous years,
were reportedly still in detention at year's end. In
May 2003, Yao Fuxin and Xiao Yunliang, leaders of a
large labor protest in Liaoyang City, Liaoning
Province, who were detained in March 2002, were
sentenced to 7 and 4 years in prison for subversion,
based largely on allegations that they had made
contact with the CDP in 1998, several years before the
workers protests. Many observers believed that the
sentences were largely in retaliation for their role
in the labor protests and in exposing official
corruption. Prison authorities continued to deny the
two activists' applications for medical parole. Other
labor activists reportedly still in detention included
Hu Mingjun, Wang Sen, Wang Miaogen, Zhang Shanguang,
Li Wangyang, Li Jiaqing, Miao Jinhong, Ni Xiafei, Li
Keyou, Liao Shihua, Yue Tianxiang, Guo Xinmin, He
Zhaohui, Peng Shi, Wang Guoqi, and labor lawyer Xu
Jian.
The country was a member of the International Labor
Organization (ILO) and had ratified core ILO
conventions prohibiting child labor, the worst forms
of child labor, and discrimination in remuneration
between male and female workers. At year's end, the
Government had not ratified other core conventions
regarding the right of association, the right to
collective bargaining, and the prohibition against
compulsory labor.
In March 2003, the International Confederation of Free
Trade Unions (ICFTU) amended an existing complaint to
the ILO, adding allegations of freedom of association
violations in the handling of the Tieshu Textile
Factory matter. At year's end, the Government had not
replied to the ILO's communications with respect to
this matter.
The ACFTU had active ties with foreign trade union
organizations and had a cooperative relationship with
the ILO's China office. In 2002, the ACFTU gained a
deputy workers' member seat on the ILO's Governing
Body, a seat it lost in 1990 during the crackdown
following the Tiananmen Square massacre. The ICFTU has
publicly condemned the country for its denial of the
right of free association, in particular for arresting
labor activists. Pursuant to a 2001 Memorandum of
Understanding with the ILO, the Ministry of Labor and
Social Security (MOLSS) held the China Employment
Forum in April. MOLSS also hosted the annual meeting
of the International Social Security Association
(ISSA) in September. On December 3, the Development
Research Center of the State Council announced that a
seminar on Socially Responsible Investment was
postponed and visas for some participants rescinded.
As a result, a long-planned visit by the OECD's Trade
Union Advisory Council did not take place. The ACFTU
also cooperated with the U.N. Development Program on a
program to develop market-based approaches to help
laid-off workers start their own businesses. Part of
the program was designed to assist unions to adapt to
a new labor relations model.
b. The Right to Organize and Bargain Collectively
The Labor Law permits collective bargaining for
workers in all types of enterprises; however, in
practice, genuine collective bargaining still did not
occur. Under the law, collective contracts are to be
developed through collaboration between the labor
union (or worker representatives in the absence of a
union) and management, and should specify such matters
as working conditions, wage scales, and hours of work.
The law also permits workers and employers in all
types of enterprises to sign individual contracts,
which are to be drawn up in accordance with the
collective contract. The Ministry of Labor and Social
Security in January promulgated new regulations, which
took effect in May, governing collective contracts.
The country's shift toward a market economy and
changing labor management relations created pressures
for collective bargaining that would include more
genuine negotiations and take workers' interests into
greater account. The Trade Union Law specifically
addresses unions' responsibility to bargain
collectively on behalf of workers' interests. However,
given the non-democratic, Party-dominated nature of
the country's unions, collective bargaining fell far
short of international standards. Workers had no means
to formally approve or reject the outcome of
collective contract negotiations and, without the
right to strike, only a limited capacity to influence
the negotiation process.
In the private sector, where official unions were few
and alternative union organizations were unavailable,
workers faced substantial obstacles to bargaining
collectively with management. Workplace-based worker
committees, serve as the vehicle for worker input into
state-owned enterprise policies. These weakened during
the year, and where they existed, the committees were
often little more than rubber stamps for deals
predetermined by enterprise management, the union, and
the CCP representative.
The Trade Union Law provides specific legal remedies
against anti-union discrimination and specifies that
union representatives may not be transferred or
terminated by enterprise management during their term
of office. These provisions were aimed primarily at
the private sector, where resistance to unions was
common. The degree to which these provisions were
enforced was unknown. Anti-union activity was
virtually unknown in the state-owned sector.
Neither the Constitution nor the Labor Law provides
for the right to strike. The Trade Union Law
acknowledges that strikes may occur, in which case the
union is to reflect the views and demands of workers
in seeking a resolution of the strike. Some observers
interpreted this provision to offer at least a
theoretical legal basis for the right to strike.
However, the Government continued to treat worker
protests as illegal demonstrations, indicating that
there was still no officially accepted right to
strike. In addition, no other types of planned worker
action were allowed.
During the year, the profound economic and social
changes affecting workers continued to produce
labor-related disputes and worker actions (see Section
2.b.). Most worker protests involved actual and feared
job losses, wage or benefit arrears, allegations of
owner/management corruption, or worker dissatisfaction
with new contracts offered in enterprise
restructuring. The Government took swift action to
halt protests. Police detained protest leaders and
dispersed demonstrations. In some cases, management,
often at the direction of the Government, subsequently
offered payments that met at least a portion of
protesters' demands. The most noteworthy recent labor
protests involved thousands of organized workers and
sympathizers demonstrating in Liaoyang, Liaoning
Province, in 2002. The workers protested alleged
corruption in the closure of a major local SOE, the
loss of jobs, and wage and benefit irregularities. Two
protest leaders, Yao Fuxin and Xiao Yunliang, were
convicted on subversion charges and sentenced in May
2003 (see Section 6.a.). After the protests, the
former manager of the SOE was convicted of smuggling.
The local Government fired Liaoyang's police chief and
demoted a top Party official in the city. During the
year, worker protests also occurred at private
companies. In March and April, significant strikes
occurred at factories of Stella International in
Dongguan, Guangdong Province. A series of incidents of
unrest, including strikes, ended in the detention of
over 75 workers on charges of destruction of property,
including three workers under age 18. Ten workers were
convicted of destruction of property in the incidents
but were released on December 31 as a result of court
action that either suspended their sentences or lifted
criminal sanctions.
The Labor Law provides for mediation, arbitration, and
court resolution of labor disputes. Under these
procedures, cases are to be dealt with first in the
workplace, through a mediation committee, then, if
unresolved, through a local arbitration committee
under government sponsorship. If no solution is
reached at this level, the dispute may be submitted to
the courts. According to the Ministry of Labor and
Social Security, 134,700 disputes involving 477,000
workers were submitted to arbitration during the first
half of the year. The Ministry's yearly statistical
report stated that 226,391 disputes involving 800,000
workers were handled during the year, increases of
approximately 22.8 percent and 31.7 percent,
respectively, over the previous year. The vast
majority of cases, 223,503 (98 percent) were resolved.
Of these, 67,765 cases (30 percent) were resolved by
mediation, 95,774 (43 percent) were resolved by
arbitration and 59,954 (27 percent) were resolved by
other means. In 2002, 10,823 (4.7 percent) of total
cases were collective labor disputes.
Observers differed over the effectiveness of these
dispute resolution procedures. Workers reportedly had
little trust in the fairness of workplace mediation.
They viewed unions, which played a major mediation
role, as inclined to favor management. Workers favored
arbitration over workplace mediation, although they
often looked with suspicion on the local government
role in the process. There appeared to be increasing
recognition, including among government officials,
that some aspects of the dispute resolution system
needed revision.
Laws governing working conditions in Special Economic
Zones (SEZs) were not significantly different from
those in effect in the rest of the country. Lax
enforcement of these laws by provincial and local
officials was a serious problem in the SEZs, as in
other parts of the country. Wages in the SEZs and in
the southeastern part of the country generally were
higher for some categories of workers. Officials
acknowledged that some investors in the SEZs were able
to negotiate "sweetheart" deals with local partners
that bypassed labor regulations requiring the
provision of benefits and overtime compensation. Some
foreign businesses in the SEZs had ACFTU-affiliated
unions, and management reported positive relations
with union representatives, in part because the ACFTU
discouraged strikes and work stoppages.
c. Prohibition on Forced or Compulsory Labor
The law prohibits forced and compulsory labor, and the
Government denied that forced or compulsory labor was
a problem; however, forced labor was a serious problem
in penal institutions. Citizens were consigned without
judicial process to penal labor institutions (see
Section 1.c.) that, by law and policy, utilized labor
as a means of reform and reeducation.
Reeducation-through-labor detainees and prisoners and
pretrial detainees in the regular prison system were
required to work, often with little or no
remuneration. Diplomatic observers generally were
unable to gain access to reform institutions to
evaluate allegations about the treatment of prisoners.
In some cases, prisoners worked in facilities directly
connected with penal institutions; in other cases,
they were contracted to nonprison enterprises.
Facilities and their management profited from inmate
labor.
In 1992, the U.S. and Chinese Governments signed a
memorandum of understanding (MOU), followed by an
implementing statement of cooperation (SOC) in 1994.
These agreements expressed the intention of the
governments to cooperate to ensure that prison-made
products were not exported to the United States.
Chinese cooperation under the MOU and SOC improved
during the year. Regular monthly working-level
meetings were held from December 2003 through the end
of the year. Visits to three prison-related facilities
were conducted in February, July and December, and the
cases related to these facilities were closed. At
year's end, the backlog of cases remained substantial.
The Government continued to explicitly exclude from
the agreements reform- and reeducation through labor
institutions.
The Government prohibits forced and bonded labor by
children, but some child trafficking victims were
reportedly sold into forced labor (see Section 5).
d. Prohibition of Child Labor and Minimum Age for
Employment
The law prohibits the employment of children under the
age of 16, but the Government had not adopted a
comprehensive policy to combat child labor. The Labor
Law specifies administrative review, fines, and
revocation of business licenses of those businesses
that illegally hire minors. The law also stipulates
that parents or guardians should provide for
children's subsistence. Workers between the ages of 16
and 18 were referred to as "juvenile workers" and were
prohibited from engaging in certain forms of physical
work, including labor in mines.
The Government continued to maintain that the country
did not have a widespread child labor problem and that
the majority of children who worked did so at the
behest of their families, particularly in impoverished
rural areas, to supplement family income. Child
workers in rural areas appeared to work primarily in
township and village enterprises and in agriculture.
In urban areas, they often worked as menial and street
laborers. State-run media reported on children working
at a Tianjin knitting mill and, in 2003, on children
working at a handicrafts company in Fuzhou, in
factories in Shanghai and Guangzhou, and in a hotel in
Anhui Province. Some students worked in light
industrial production within or for their schools.
Some observers believed that coalmines, which often
operated far from urban centers and out of the purview
of law enforcement officials, also occasionally
employed children. The existence of a large adult
migrant labor force, often willing to work long hours
for low wages, reduced the attractiveness of child
labor for employers. State-run media reported on
province-wide investigations into child labor by
provincial labor and social security bureaus and on
investigations done at the request of reporters.
e. Acceptable Conditions of Work
The Labor Law provides for broad legal protections for
workers on such matters as working hours, wages, and
safety and health. The Trade Union Law invests unions
with the authority to protect workers against
violations of their legal rights or contractually
agreed conditions of work. The Law on the Prevention
and Treatment of Occupational Diseases and the
Production Safety Law identify responsibilities for
work-related illness and accidents and provide for
specific penalties for violation of the law. In
November, the Government promulgated regulations on
labor inspections, which expand the powers of
government inspectors and increase penalties against
employers for failure to pay the minimum wage, for
being in arrears on wages, and for unreasonably
withholding wages. However, there remained a
substantial gap between the law's formal provisions
for work conditions and the actual situation in the
workplace.
There was no national minimum wage. The Labor Law
allows local governments to set their own minimum wage
according to standards promulgated by the Ministry of
Labor and Social Security. In January, the Ministry
promulgated a new regulation on minimum wages. The
regulation, which took effect in March, sets out the
formula by which localities set the minimum wage;
expands the range of employers required to observe the
minimum wage to include individually-owned enterprises
with fewer than eight employees, public institutions,
and social organizations; and provides for an hourly
minimum wage for part-time workers. The regulation
states that the departments of labor and social
security at or above the county level are responsible
for enforcement of the law. The regulation also
provides that where the ACFTU finds an employer in
violation of the regulation, it shall have the power
to demand that the department of labor and social
security deal with the case; at year's end, it was
unclear whether the union had exercised this right.
Widespread official corruption and efforts by local
officials to attract and keep taxpaying, job-producing
enterprises that might otherwise locate elsewhere
undercut enforcement of the minimum wage provisions.
Wage arrearages to employees of state-owned and
private enterprises were common. During the year, the
Government pledged to clear up wage arrearages in the
construction industry within 3 years. State-run media
reported that by year's end, 98.4 percent of the $4
billion (RMB 33.2 billion) owed to migrant workers for
work on construction projects had been repaid.
The Labor Law mandates a 40-hour standard workweek,
excluding overtime, and a 24-hour weekly rest period.
It also prohibits overtime work in excess of 3 hours
per day or 36 hours per month and mandates a required
percentage of additional pay for overtime work.
However, these standards were regularly violated,
particularly in the private sector. They were
particularly ignored in enterprises that could rely on
a vast supply of low-skilled migrant labor. In many
industries, such as textile and garment manufacturing,
compulsory overtime reportedly was common, often
without overtime pay. Some areas of the country in
which wages and working conditions reportedly were
substandard, including parts of Guangdong Province,
experienced shortages of workers during the year.
During the year, auditors found that some factories
routinely falsified overtime and payroll records.
There also were reports of workers being prevented
from leaving factory compounds without permission.
Occupational health and safety concerns remained
serious. The poor enforcement of occupational health
and safety laws and regulations continued to put
workers' lives at risk. The State Administration for
Work Safety (SAWS), which was administratively joined
with the State Administration for Coal Mine Safety
Supervision (SACMSS), was responsible for providing a
nationwide framework for work safety. With enactment
of the Work Safety Act in 2002, the Government gave
SAWS/SACMSS a specific, detailed legal framework for
its responsibilities. SAWS/SACMSS staffed nearly 70
field offices throughout the country. In January, SAWS
promulgated regulations requiring companies in the
mining, construction, dangerous chemicals, fireworks,
and explosives industries to obtain work safety
licenses as a prerequisite to doing business. SAWS
also promulgated regulations governing work safety in
the construction and electrical industries. In 2003,
SAWS was given responsibility for workplace health
supervision and inspection. The Ministry of Health was
responsible for prevention and treatment of
occupational illness. Some provincial and local
governments have followed the national pattern of
establishing separate work safety agencies. However,
enforcement of national health and safety standards,
which was the responsibility of governments below the
national level, remained very weak.
Workplace health and safety did not improve
significantly during the year, and there continued to
be a high rate of industrial accidents. According to
official statistics, from January to November, there
were 13,268 work-related accidents, resulting in
14,595 deaths, compared with 15,597 workplace
accidents, resulting in 17,315 deaths, for all of
2003. Coalmines were by far the most deadly
workplaces. From January to November, 3,413 mine
accidents occurred, killing 5,286 persons, a decrease
of 253 accidents (6.9 percent) and 451 deaths (7.9
percent) from the previous year. SAWS claimed that the
rate of 3 deaths per million tons of coal mined was
the lowest in the country's history. Coalmine
accidents comprised approximately 27 percent of all
non-traffic, non-fire-related workplace accidents but
accounted for approximately 40 percent of
corresponding workplace deaths. Industrial accidents
involving chemical leaks also caused numerous deaths
and injuries. Enterprise owners and managers sometimes
failed to report accidents and health problems. Local
officials also often underreported such incidents. As
a result, the actual number of workplace deaths and
casualties was likely far higher.
The high rate of coal mining accidents highlighted
serious enforcement problems in that sector. An
October gas explosion in a Henan mine reportedly
killed 147 miners. In November, 166 miners were killed
in a single accident at a state-owned mine in Shaanxi
Province, sparking reportedly violent protests by
relatives of miners.
In recent years, the Government has closed tens of
thousands of small coalmines, many of them illegal
operations. Despite these efforts, many mines reopened
illegally soon after closing. Observers attributed the
enforcement problem in the coalmining sector primarily
to corruption, a need to sustain employment in poor
areas where many of the most dangerous mines were
located, and the paucity and poor training of
inspectors.
Government officials and media have stressed the need
to control workplace accidents. In June, Vice Premier
Huang Ju called for adopting effective preventive
measures to stem industrial accidents. In April,
following the blowout of a natural gas well, which
killed 243 and injured more than 4,000 persons, a
State Council Executive Committee Meeting chaired by
Premier Wen Jiabao accepted the resignation of the
general manager of the China National Petroleum
Corporation (CNPC). The deputy manager of the CNPC
subsidiary, an engineer, drilling team head, drilling
technician, and two workers were prosecuted and
received prison sentences for their role in the
accident.
Fewer than half of rural enterprises met national dust
and poison standards. Many factories that used harmful
products, such as asbestos, not only failed to protect
their workers against the ill effects of such
products, but also failed to inform them about the
hazards.
Almost 46 million workers participated in the
country's work-injury insurance system at the end of
2003, an increase of 1.69 million over the previous
year. In recent years, small but growing numbers of
workers also began to use lawsuits to pursue work
injury and illness claims against employers.
The Work Safety Law provides that employees have the
right, after spotting an emergency situation that
threatens their personal safety, to evacuate the
workplace. Employers are forbidden to cancel the labor
contracts, or reduce the wages or benefits, of any
employee who takes such action. There was little
information about how this law was applied in
practice.
TIBET
The United States recognizes the Tibet Autonomous
Region (TAR) and Tibetan autonomous prefectures and
counties in other provinces to be a part of the
People's Republic of China. The Department of State
follows these designations in its reporting. The
preservation and development of Tibet's unique
religious, cultural, and linguistic heritage and the
protection of its people's fundamental human rights
continue to be of concern.
Respect for Integrity of the Person
The Government's human rights record in Tibetan areas
of China remained poor. However, in positive
developments, the Government permitted a third visit
to the country by the Dalai Lama's representatives and
released some political prisoners, including Tibetan
Buddhist nun Phuntsog Nyidrol. The Government
controlled information about all Tibetan areas, and in
addition, strictly controlled access to the TAR,
making it difficult to determine accurately the scope
of human rights abuses. Authorities continued to
commit serious human rights abuses, including
extra-judicial killing, torture, arbitrary arrest,
detention without public trial, and lengthy detention
of Tibetans for peacefully expressing their political
or religious views. The overall level of repression of
religious freedom in the TAR remained high. Conditions
generally were less restrictive in Tibetan areas
outside of the TAR, although there were some
exceptions. Individuals accused of political activism
faced ongoing harassment during the year. There were
reports of imprisonment and abuse of some nuns and
monks accused of political activism. Security was
intensified during sensitive anniversaries and
festival days in some areas, and activities viewed as
vehicles for political dissent, including celebration
of some religious festivals, were suppressed. There
were reports of small-scale political protests in a
number of Tibetan areas.
The lack of independent access to prisoners and
prisons made it difficult to ascertain the number of
Tibetan political prisoners or to assess the extent
and severity of abuses. The Tibet Information Network
(TIN) estimated that approximately 145 Tibetans were
imprisoned on political grounds, approximately
two-thirds of whom were monks or nuns. Approximately
60 political prisoners remained in TAR Prison in
Lhasa, most serving sentences on the charge of
"counterrevolution," which was dropped from the
Criminal Law in 1997. Chinese authorities have stated
that acts previously prosecuted as
counterrevolutionary crimes continue to be considered
crimes under China's anti-subversion laws. TIN's
analysis indicated that the majority of Tibetan
political prisoners were incarcerated in Lhasa and
western Sichuan Province. The overall number of
political prisoners in Tibetan areas dropped slightly
compared to 2003, according to this analysis, but rose
in Tibetan autonomous areas of Sichuan Province in
connection with several high-profile cases.
In October, Radio Free Asia (RFA) reported that police
in Qinghai's Golog Prefecture shot and killed Tibetan
Buddhist religious leader Shetsul after he and other
monks demanded that the police pay for medical
treatment for injuries suffered while in custody.
In January, RFA reported that authorities in Sichuan's
Tawu County, Kardze Prefecture, had arrested students
Nyima Dorjee and Lobsang Dorjee for putting up
pro-independence posters on local government
buildings.
On February 12, Choeden Rinzen, a young monk at
Lhasa's Ganden Monastery, reportedly was arrested for
possession of a picture of the Dalai Lama and a
Tibetan national flag.
In April, RFA reported that authorities in Qinghai's
Tsolho Prefecture had arrested Tibetan singer Namkha,
as well as composer and Tibetan Buddhist monk Bakocha,
for their music's implicit political content.
Authorities reportedly confiscated CDs of Namkha and
Bakocha's music. Authorities released both individuals
in early May.
In May, Chinese state media reported that authorities
jailed a Tibetan named Penpa after he admitted to
causing a May 20 explosion near a television tower
near Lhasa.
In September, RFA reported that authorities in
Sichuan's Kardze Prefecture sentenced Tibetan Buddhist
monks Chogri and Topden and layman Lobsang Tsering to
3-year jail terms for putting up pro-independence
posters. The three were reportedly among a group of 60
individuals detained on July 27 at a reception
ceremony at Chogri Monastery in Draggo County, Kardze.
Witnesses claimed that police beat some of those
detained. It was believed that the other 57
individuals initially detained had been released by
year’s end.
Also in September, authorities in the TAR's Nagchu
Prefecture reportedly arrested Tibetans Dejor, Tsering
Dawa, and Datsok after a clash with Chinese workers
over a mining project. They reportedly also arrested
Tibetans Nyima Tenzen and Sonam Nyidup, who protested
the detention by shouting pro-independence slogans in
a bar.
On February 24, authorities released Tibetan Buddhist
nun Phuntsog Nyidrol from Lhasa's TAR Prison (also
known as Drapchi Prison) approximately 1 year before
her sentence was due to expire. She had received a
9-year sentence for taking part in a peaceful
demonstration in support of the Dalai Lama in 1989.
Authorities extended her sentence to 17 years after
she and other nuns recorded songs about their devotion
to Tibet and the Dalai Lama in 1993 but reduced that
sentence by 1 year in 2001 According to Human Rights
Watch, following her release, the Chinese government
imposed restrictions on Phuntsog Nyidrol's movement
and association.
On April 18, authorities reportedly released Tibetan
Buddhist monk Ngawang Oezer from TAR Prison upon
completion of his 15-year sentence for participating
in pro-independence activities at Drepung Monastery.
In August, observers confirmed the release of Kunchok
Choephel Labrang and Jigme Jamtruk, two monks from
Labrang Tashikyil Monastery, Gansu Province.
Authorities reportedly arrested the monks in April
2003 for possessing booklets containing speeches of
the Dalai Lama.
In October, authorities released Geshe Sonam Phuntsog,
a religious leader from Darge Monastery in Kardze
County, Kardze Prefecture, Sichuan Province.
Authorities arrested Sonam Phuntsog in 1999 and
sentenced him to a 5-year term for "inciting
splittism," traveling to India to visit the Dalai
Lama, and holding long-life prayer ceremonies for the
Dalai Lama.
During the year, authorities did not respond to
international calls for an inquiry into the case of
Nyima Dragpa. A monk from Nyatso Monastery in
Sichuan's Kardze Prefecture, Nyima Dragpa died in
custody in October 2003, allegedly from injuries
sustained during severe beatings.
On January 15, Yeshe Gyatso, a former member of the
Chinese People's Consultative Conference, died at his
home in Lhasa at the age of 71. TAR authorities had
arrested Yeshi Gyatso in June 2003 on charges of
splittism and sentenced him to 6 years' imprisonment
but released him in November 2003 in ill health.
Prominent religious leader Tenzin Deleg Rinpoche,
arrested in April 2002 for his alleged connection to a
series of bombings, remained imprisoned under a death
sentence with a 2-year reprieve, although officials
indicated to international observers in December that
his suspended death sentence would likely be commuted
to life in prison in accordance with Chinese law and
practice. Tenzin Deleg's former associate, Lobsang
Dondrub, was executed on January 26, 2003, for his
part in the alleged bombings. Lobsang Dondrub's
execution occurred despite Chinese Government
assurances that both individuals would be afforded
full due process, and that the national-level Supreme
People's Court would review their sentences.
Many other political prisoners also remained in prison
or detention at year's end, including former Tibet
University student Lobsang Tenzin, arrested in 1988 in
connection with the death of a policeman during riots
in Lhasa and currently surving an 18-year sentence in
the TAR's Pome Prison; Tibetan Buddhist monk Jigme
Gyatso, arrested in 1996 for founding a Tibetan youth
organization and serving a 15-year sentence in Lhasa's
TAR Prison; farmers Sonam Dorje and Lhundrub Dorje,
arrested in 1992 for unfurling a Tibetan flag and
shouting pro-independence slogans, respectively
serving 15- and 13-year sentences at TAR Prison; and
monks Kalsang Dondrub and Ngawang Dondrub, sentenced
in 2003 on charges of "endangering state security" for
nonviolent political activities. Chadrel Rinpoche,
released in 2002 after 6 years and 6 months in prison
for leaking information about the selection of the
Panchen Lama, was reportedly still under house arrest
near Lhasa. Requests to meet with him by foreign
government officials continued to be denied.
As in the rest of China, the security apparatus
employed torture and degrading treatment in dealing
with some detainees and prisoners. Detainees released
in 2003 reported credibly that officials used electric
shocks, prolonged periods of solitary confinement,
incommunicado detention beatings, and other forms of
abuse. Tibetans repatriated to China from Nepal in May
2003 reportedly suffered torture, including electric
shocks, exposure to cold, and severe beatings, and
were forced to perform heavy physical labor. Their
family members also were pressured for bribes to
secure their release. Prisoners were subjected
routinely to "political investigation" sessions and
were punished if deemed to be insufficiently loyal to
the State.
Legal safeguards for Tibetans detained or imprisoned
were the same as those in the rest of China and were
inadequate in both design and implementation. Most
judges had little or no legal training. Authorities
worked to address this problem through increased legal
education opportunities. According to an official of
the TAR Higher People's Court, all seven cities and
prefectures had established legal assistance centers,
and 1,248 residents had received assistance by the end
of 2003. However, some persons accused of political
and other crimes did not have legal representation.
Moreover, their trials were cursory and were closed if
issues of state security were involved. Under the law,
maximum prison sentences for crimes such as
"endangering state security" and "splitting the
country" were 15 years for each count, not to exceed
20 years in total. Such cases mainly concerned actions
perceived to be in support of Tibetan independence,
and activities did not have to be violent to be
illegal or to draw a heavy sentence.
An unknown number of Tibetans were serving sentences
in "reeducation-through-labor" camps and other forms
of administrative detention not subject to judicial
review. Conditions in administrative detention
facilities, such as reeducation-through-labor camps,
were similar to those in prisons. In July, state media
reported that authorities had established a new
reeducation-through-labor camp in the TAR's western
Ngari Prefecture. The 40,000 square-foot camp
reportedly could accommodate 200 inmates.
Prisoners in Tibetan areas were generally subject to
the same conditions regarding forced labor as those in
other areas of China. Forced labor was used in some
prisons, detention centers, reeducation-through-labor
facilities, and at work sites where prisoners were
used as workers. The law states that prisoners may be
required to work up to 12 hours per day, with 1 rest
day every 2 weeks, but these regulations often were
not enforced.
Family planning policies permitted Tibetans and
members of other minority groups to have more children
than Han Chinese. Urban Tibetans, including Communist
Party members, were generally permitted to have two
children. Rural Tibetans were encouraged, but not
required, to limit births to three children. These
regulations were not strictly enforced.
The Office of the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR) reported that 2,427 Tibetan new arrivals
approached UNHCR in Nepal during the year, of whom
2,338 were found to be "of concern" and of whom 2,318
were provided with basic assistance; the remaining 89
Tibetan new arrivals departed for India without being
registered or processed by UNHCR. In August, a TAR
tourism official stated that approximately 400 TAR
residents had traveled abroad in the first 8 months of
the year, an increase over a total of 300 in 2003.
Many Tibetans, particularly those from rural areas,
continued to report difficulties obtaining passports.
The application process was not transparent, and
residents of different Tiebtan areas reported
obstacles ranging from bureaucratic inefficiency and
corruption to denials based on the applicant's
political activities or beliefs. Police in China have
stated that passport regulations permit them to deny
passports to those whose travel will "harm the
national security and national interests.
Due in part to such difficulties and in part to the
difficulty many Chinese citizens of Tibetan ethnicity
encountered in obtaining entry visas for India, it was
difficult for Tibetans to travel to India for
religious and other purposes. The Government placed
restrictions on the movement of Tibetans during
sensitive anniversaries and events and increased
controls over border areas at these times.
Nevertheless, thousands of Tibetans from China,
including monks and nuns, visited India via third
countries and returned to China after temporary stays.
In February, RFA reported that the majority of
Tibetans who transited Nepal to India were young
Tibetans, whose ages ranged from 6 to 30, and that the
main reason they migrated was the lack of
Tibetan-language educational facilities and
opportunities for religious education.
There were reports of arbitrary detention of persons,
particularly monks, returning to China from Nepal.
Detentions generally lasted for several months,
although in most cases no formal charges were brought.
In January, and again in September, there were reports
that the Nepali government cooperated with Chinese
authorities to repatriate Tibetans who crossed the
border. NGOs reported that some individuals were
detained and mistreated upon their return to China.
For example, the Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and
Democracy stated that when monks Gedun Tsundue and
Jamphel Gyatso crossed back into China in February
after studying in India, they were detained for 4
months and fined $545 (RMB 4,500) each. In July, RFA
reported that Tibetan Buddhist monks Tenzen Samten and
Thubten Samdup remained in detention at Shigatse's
Nyari Prison 5 months after being arrested while
attempting to cross the border from Nepal into China.
According to RFA, the two monks were arrested with two
other individuals, Sherab and Nawang Namgyal, in
February.
The Government also regulated foreign travel to the
TAR. In accordance with a 1989 regulation, foreign
visitors (excluding individuals from Hong Kong, Macau,
and Taiwan) were required to obtain an official
confirmation letter issued by the Chinese Government
before entering the TAR. Most tourists obtained such
letters by booking tours through officially registered
travel agencies. In July, state media announced that
foreign tourists would enjoy "unrestricted access to
all 70 counties of the TAR." However, TAR authorities
were unable to confirm the change, and travelers
reported that many restrictions remained in place.
Official visits to the TAR were supervised closely and
afforded delegation members very few opportunities to
meet local persons not previously approved by the
authorities. Foreigners could travel freely in most
Tibetan areas outside the TAR. In March, authorities
lifted restrictions on foreign travel to the last four
closed counties in Sichuan's Ngaba Prefecture.
Freedom of Religion
Overall, the level of repression in Tibetan areas
remained high and the Government's record of respect
for religious freedom remained poor during the year.
The Constitution of the People's Republic of China
provides for freedom of religious belief, and the
Government's May White Paper on "Regional Ethnic
Autonomy in Tibet" stated, "Tibetans fully enjoy the
freedom of religious belief." However, the Government
maintained tight controls on religious practices and
places of worship in Tibetan areas. Although the
authorities permitted many traditional practices and
public manifestations of belief, they promptly and
forcibly suppressed activities they viewed as vehicles
for political dissent or advocacy of Tibetan
independence, such as religious activities venerating
the Dalai Lama (which the Chinese government described
as "splittist").
The atmosphere for religious freedom varied from
region to region. Conditions were generally more
relaxed in Tibetan autonomous areas outside the TAR,
with the exception of parts of Sichuan's Kardze
Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture. Most abbots and monks
in Tibetan areas outside the TAR reported that they
had greater freedom to worship, to conduct religious
training, and to manage the affairs of their
monasteries than their coreligionists in the TAR;
however, restrictions remained. The Associated Press
reported that, in November, Communist officials met
with Buddhist leaders in Qinghai Province and warned
that the Buddhist leaders would be punished if they
failed to win greater support for Beijing's policies
toward the exiled Dalai Lama and greater acceptance
among their followers for Gyaltsen Norbu, the boy
picked by the PRC as the reincarnation of the Panchen
Lama, the second most prominent figure in Tibetan
Buddhism.
Most Tibetans practiced Tibetan Buddhism and, to a
lesser extent, the traditional Tibetan Bon religion.
This held true for many Tibetan government officials
and Communist Party members. Bon includes beliefs and
ceremonies that practitioners believe predate the
arrival of Buddhism in Tibet in the 7th century.
Approximately 615 Tibetan Buddhist religious figures
held positions in local people's congresses and
committees of the Chinese People's Political
Consultative Conference in the TAR. However, the
Government continued to insist that Communist Party
members and senior employees adhere to the Party's
code of atheism, and routine political training for
cadres continued to promote atheism. Government
officials confirmed that some Religious Affairs Bureau
(RAB) officers were members of the Communist Party and
that religious belief is incompatible with Party
membership. However, some lower level RAB officials
practiced Buddhism.
Security was intensified during the Dalai Lama's
birthday, sensitive anniversaries, and festival days
in the TAR and in some other Tibetan areas as well. In
June, observers reported that students and faculty at
Tibet University were restrained from participating in
religious devotions connected to the Sagadawa
festival. The prohibition on celebrating the Dalai
Lama's birthday on July 6 continued. In August, some
Lhasa residents privately expressed unhappiness with
city authorities' plans to fix the date of the Drepung
Shodon festival, which traditionally varied according
to the Tibetan lunar calendar, on August 18th in order
to promote tourism. However, residents were reportedly
permitted to carry out observances on the traditional
date a week later.
On May 23, the Government issued a White Paper on
"Regional Ethnic Autonomy in Tibet," in which it urged
the Dalai Lama to drop his "bid for Tibetan
independence" and stated "the possibility of
instituting another social system does not exist." In
September, the Government extended invitations to
emissaries of the Dalai Lama to visit Tibetan and
other areas of China. The delegation visited
Guangdong, Beijing, and Tibetan areas of western
Sichuan Province. This marked the third visit of
emissaries of the Dalai Lama to China in as many
years. In September 2002, Lodi Gyari and Kelsang
Gyaltsen, the Dalai Lama's representatives to the
United States and Europe respectively, traveled to
Beijing, Lhasa, and other cities and met with a number
of government officials. These were the first formal
contacts between the Dalai Lama's representatives and
the Government since 1993. They made a second trip to
China in June 2003 to meet with Chinese officials and
visited Shanghai, Beijing, and Tibetan areas in Yunnan
Province. Additionally, Gyalo Thondup, the Dalai
Lama's elder brother, visited in July 2002, making his
first trip to the TAR since leaving in 1959 and
subsequently has made additional private visits to
China. The Government asserted that the door to
dialogue and negotiation were open, provided that the
Dalai Lama public affirmed that Tibet and Taiwan were
inseparable parts of China.
Government officials maintained that possessing or
displaying pictures of the Dalai Lama was not illegal.
Authorities, however, appeared to view possession of
such photos as evidence of separatist sentiment when
detaining individuals on political charges. Pictures
of the Dalai Lama were not openly displayed in major
monasteries and could not be purchased openly in the
TAR. In August, TAR Deputy Chairman Wu Jilie told
visiting western journalists that not displaying the
Dalai Lama's photo was the voluntary choice of most
TAR residents. During the year, diplomatic and other
observers saw pictures of a number of religious
figures, including the Dalai Lama, displayed more
widely in Tibetan areas outside the TAR. The
Government also continued to ban pictures of Gendun
Choekyi Nyima, the boy recognized by the Dalai Lama as
the Panchen Lama. Photos of the "official" Panchen
Lama, Gyaltsen Norbu, were not publicly displayed in
most places, most likely because most Tibetans refuse
to recognize him as the Panchen Lama. In February, RFA
reported that authorities had warned Tibetans in two
counties of Sichuan's Kardze Prefecture that they
would lose their land if they did not surrender
pictures of the Dalai Lama. There were no reports that
this warning was enforced. However, in Sichuan’s
Karzde Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture and Litang,
authorities reportedly conducted house to house
searches in 2003 and confiscated private displays of
the Dalai Lama’s photo.
The Government's May White Paper stated that the TAR
had over 46,000 Tibetan Buddhist monks and nuns and
more than 1,700 venues for Tibetan Buddhist
activities. Officials have cited almost identical
figures since 1996, although the numbers of monks and
nuns dropped at many sites as a result of the
"patriotic education" campaign and the expulsion from
monasteries and nunneries of many monks and nuns who
refused to denounce the Dalai Lama or who were found
to be "politically unqualified." These numbers
represented only the TAR, where the number of monks
and nuns was very strictly controlled; approximately
60,000 Tibetan Buddhist monks and nuns lived in
Tibetan areas outside the TAR, according to informed
estimates.
Government officials closely associated Buddhist
monasteries with pro-independence activism in Tibetan
areas of China. Spiritual leaders encountered
difficulty re-establishing historical monasteries due
to lack of funds, general limitations on monastic
education, and denials of government permission to
build and operate religious institutions, which
officials in some areas contended were a drain on
local resources and a conduit for political
infiltration by the Tibetan exile community. The
Government stated that there were no limits on the
number of monks in major monasteries, and that each
monastery's Democratic Management Committee (DMC)
decided independently how many monks the monastery
could support. Many of these committees, however, were
government-controlled, and, in practice, the
Government imposed strict limits on the number of
monks in major monasteries, particularly in the TAR.
The Government had the right to disapprove any
individual's application to take up religious orders;
however, the Government did not necessarily exercise
this right in practice during the year. Authorities
curtailed the traditional practice of sending young
boys to monasteries for religious training by means of
regulations that forbade monasteries from accepting
individuals under the age of 18. Nevertheless, some
monasteries continued to admit younger boys, often
delaying their formal registration until the age of
18.
The Government continued to oversee the daily
operations of major monasteries. The Government, which
did not contribute to the monasteries' operating
funds, retained management control of monasteries
through the DMCs and local religious affairs bureaus.
Regulations restricted leadership of many DMCs to
"patriotic and devoted" monks and nuns and specified
that the Government must approve all members of the
committees. At some monasteries, government officials
also sat on the committees.
The quality and availability of high-level religious
teachers in the TAR and other Tibetan areas remained
inadequate; many teachers were in exile, older
teachers were not being replaced, and those remaining
in Tibetan areas outside the TAR had difficulty
securing permission to teach in the TAR. In recent
years, DMCs at several large monasteries began to use
funds generated by the sales of entrance tickets or
donated by pilgrims for purposes other than the
support of monks engaged in full-time religious study.
As a result, some "scholar monks" who had formerly
been fully supported had to engage in
income-generating activities. Some experts were
concerned that, as a result, fewer monks will be
qualified to serve as teachers in the future. While
local government officials' attempts to attract
tourists to religious sites provided some monasteries
with extra income, they also deflected time and energy
from religious instruction. There were reports of
disagreements between monastic leaders and government
officials over visitors, vehicle traffic, and
culturally inappropriate construction near monastic
sites. However, in July, authorities permitted
resumption of the Geshe Lharampa examinations, the
highest religious examination in the Gelug sect of
Tibetan Buddhism, at Lhasa's Jokhang Temple for the
first time in 16 years.
Government officials have stated that the "patriotic
education" campaign, which began in 1996 and often
consisted of intensive, weeks-long sessions conducted
by outside work teams, ended in 2000. However,
officials stated openly that monks and nuns continued
to undergo political education, likewise known as
"patriotic education," on a regular basis, generally
less than four times a year, but occasionally more
frequently, at their religious sites. Some religious
leaders also held local political positions. Since
primary responsibility for conducting political
education shifted from government officials to
monastery leaders, the form, content, and frequency of
training at each monastery appeared to vary widely.
However, conducting such training remained a
requirement and had become a routine part of monastic
management.
In January, Khenpo Jigme Phuntsog, the charismatic
founder of the Serthar Tibetan Buddhist Institute
(also known as Larung Gar) in Sichuan Province's
Kardze Prefecture, died while receiving medical
treatment in the provincial capital Chengdu. Founded
in 1980, the Institute grew to house 10,000 monks and
nuns before authorities moved to destroy structures
and expel students from the site in 2001, ultimately
reducing the population to approximately 4,000. After
a year's absence officially attributed to medical
treatment, Khenpo Jigme Phuntsog returned to the
Institute in 2002. As recently as May 2003, conflicts
over attempts to rebuild some structures resulted in
arrests and the enforced closure of the Institute to
outsiders. After the abbot's death, Sichuan
authorities forbade the province's Buddhist monks from
attending his funeral; nonetheless, eyewitnesses
reported that tens of thousands of Tibetan and Han
monks defied the order to pay their respects.
The Karmapa Lama, leader of Tibetan Buddhism's Karma
Kagyu sect and one of the most influential religious
figures in Tibetan Buddhism, remained in exile
following his 1999 flight to India. The Karmapa Lama
stated that he fled because of the Government's
controls on his movements and its refusal either to
allow him to go to India to be trained by his
spiritual mentors or to allow his teachers to come to
him. Visitors to Tsurphu Monastery, the seat of the
Karmapa Lama, noted that the population of monks
remained small and the atmosphere remained subdued.
The Government routinely asserted control over the
process of finding and educating reincarnate lamas.
The Panchen Lama is Tibetan Buddhism's second most
prominent figure, after the Dalai Lama. The Government
continued to insist that Gyaltsen Norbu, the boy it
selected in 1995, is the Panchen Lama's 11th
reincarnation. The Government continued to refuse to
allow access to Gendun Choekyi Nyima, the boy
recognized by the Dalai Lama in 1995 as the 11th
Panchen Lama (when he was 6 years old), and his
whereabouts were unknown. Government officials have
claimed that the boy is under government supervision,
at an undisclosed location, for his own protection and
attends classes as a "normal schoolboy." All requests
from the international community for access to the boy
to confirm his well-being have been refused. While the
overwhelming majority of Tibetan Buddhists recognized
the boy identified by the Dalai Lama as the Panchen
Lama, Tibetan monks claimed that they were forced to
sign statements pledging allegiance to the boy the
Government selected. The Communist Party also urged
its members to support the "official" Panchen Lama.
Gyaltsen Norbu made his third highly orchestrated
visit to Tibetan areas in summer 2004, and his public
appearances were marked by a heavy security presence.
Similarly, the child the Government approved as the
seventh reincarnation of Reting Rinpoche was not
accepted by many of the monks at Reting Monastery in
2000 because the Dalai Lama did not recognize his
selection. The Pawo Rinpoche, who was recognized by
the Karmapa Lama in 1994, lived under strict
government supervision at Nenang Monastery. In 2001,
NGOs reported that he was denied access to his
religious tutors and required to attend a regular
Chinese school.
In July, Tibetan and Chinese intellectuals succeeded
in their petition drive to prevent Han Chinese
sportsman Zhang Jian from swimming across Lake Namtso
in the TAR, which many Tibetan Buddhists hold sacred.
In its May White Paper, the Government claimed that
since 1949 it had contributed approximately $36
million (RMB 300 million) to renovate and open over
1,400 monasteries and to repair cultural relics, many
of which were destroyed before and during the Cultural
Revolution. In the same document, the Government
claimed to have allocated an additional $40 million
(RMB 330 million) since 2001 for the second phase of
the renovation of the Potala Palace, as well as the
renovation of the Norbulingka Palace (another former
residence of the Dalai Lama in Lhasa) and Sakya
Monastery, the seat of the Sakya sect of Tibetan
Buddhism in rural southern TAR. Despite these and
other efforts, many monasteries destroyed during the
Cultural Revolution were never rebuilt or repaired,
and others remained only partially repaired.
Government funding of restoration efforts ostensibly
supported the practice of religion, but also promoted
the development of tourism in Tibetan areas. Most
recent restoration efforts were funded privately,
although a few religious sites also received
government support for reconstruction projects during
the year.
Economic Development and Protection of Cultural
Heritage
The TAR is one of China's poorest regions, and
Tibetans are one of the poorest groups; malnutrition
among Tibetan children continued to be widespread in
many areas of the TAR. The Central Government and
other provinces of China heavily subsidized the TAR
economy, which, according to official government
statistics, grew by an average annual rate of more
than 10 percent for the last decade. Over 90 percent
of the TAR's budget came from outside sources, and
residents of the TAR benefited from a wide variety of
favorable economic and tax policies. Tibetan
autonomous areas outside the TAR benefited to varying
degrees from similar favorable policies. Government
development policies helped raise the living standards
of most Tibetans, particularly by providing better
transportation and communications facilities. However,
Han Chinese benefited disproportionately from the
Government’s development policies in Tibetan areas.
In June, state media reported that Tibetans and other
minority ethnic groups made up 78 percent of all
government employees in the TAR. However, Han Chinese
continued to hold key positions, including Party
Secretary of the TAR. A similar situation continued to
pertain to areas outside the TAR.
Some Tibetans reported that they experienced
discrimination in employment for some urban
occupations and claimed Han were hired preferentially
for many jobs and received greater pay for the same
work. This situation was partially attributed to Han
contractors’ practice of hiring through connections in
their home cities. In recent years, some Tibetans
reported that it was more difficult for Tibetans than
Han to get permits and loans to open businesses. The
widespread use of the Chinese language in urban areas
and many businesses limited employment opportunities
for Tibetans who did not speak Chinese.
Fundamental worker rights recognized by the
International Labor Organization, including the right
to organize and the right to bargain collectively,
which were broadly denied in the rest of China, were
also denied in Tibetan areas.
According to China's 2000 census, the population of
Tibetans in the TAR was 2,427,168. The population of
Tibetans in autonomous prefectures and counties
outside the TAR was 2,927,372. Tibetans made up 94
percent of the population of the TAR.
Government-sponsored development and the prospect of
new economic opportunities attracted migrant workers
from China's large transient population to the region,
resulting in a net increase in the non-Tibetan share
of the population (chiefly China's Muslim Hui minority
and Han Chinese) from approximately 4 percent in 1990
to 6 percent in 2000. However, census figures did not
include a large number of long-term Han Chinese
residents, such as cadres, skilled workers, unskilled
laborers, military and paramilitary troops, and their
dependents. In Tibetan areas outside the TAR, Tibetans
increased their majority share as natural population
growth outpaced net migration by non-Tibetans.
Migrants to the TAR were overwhelmingly concentrated
in cities and towns, while Tibetans continued to make
up nearly 98 percent of the population in rural areas.
One official estimate put the number of Han Chinese
residents in Lhasa at 100,000 out of a total
population of 409,500, while many observers estimated
that more than half of Lhasa's population was Han
Chinese. Small businesses run by Han Chinese and Hui
migrants--mostly restaurants and retail
shops--predominated in cities throughout the Tibetan
areas.
The Dalai Lama, Tibetan experts, and other observers
expressed concern that development projects and other
Central Government policies initiated in 1994 and
reemphasized and expanded at the "Fourth Tibet Work
Conference" in 2001, including the Qinghai-Tibet
railroad, would continue to promote a considerable
influx of Han Chinese, Hui, and other ethnic groups
into the TAR. They feared that the TAR's traditional
culture and Tibetan demographic dominance would be
overwhelmed by such migration
Rapid economic growth, the expanding tourism industry
and the introduction of more modern cultural
influences also have disrupted traditional living
patterns and customs and threatened traditional
Tibetan culture. In Lhasa, the Chinese cultural
presence was obvious and widespread. Residents lacked
the right to play a role in protecting their cultural
heritage.
In February, an audiotape smuggled out of China,
purportedly made by Tibetan workers, alleged that
Chinese authorities were mishandling the renovation of
the Potala Palace in Lhasa by making culturally
inappropriate architectural decisions. In September,
Lhasa Deputy Mayor Ou Guoxiang announced a project to
give Lhasa a more traditional "Tibetan look" by
renovating buildings along the main streets of the
building. Ou stated that the project had been
conceived in response to concerns about Lhasa's urban
development plans raised during the June-July 2003
UNESCO World Heritage Committee meeting.
Both Tibetan and Chinese are official languages in the
TAR, and both languages were used on public and
commercial signs. However, the Chinese language was
spoken widely, and Chinese was used for most
commercial and official communications. The dominant
position of the Chinese language in government,
commerce, and academia left many young Tibetans
seeking to get ahead with little choice but to use
Chinese rather than Tibetan.
Official government media reports in 2003 stated that
92 percent of eligible students in the TAR attended
primary school and 61 percent attended middle school
and that 80 percent of the counties in the TAR had
instituted 6-year compulsory education and 17 percent
had 9-year compulsory education. However, in practice,
many pupils in rural and nomadic areas received only 1
to 3 years of schooling. Official statistics put the
illiteracy rate for young and middle-aged TAR
residents at 37 percent, but some observers believed
it to be much higher in some areas.
The Government has established a comprehensive
national Tibetan-language curriculum, and many
elementary schools in Tibetan areas used Tibetan as
the primary language of instruction. However, Tibetan
students were also required to study Chinese language,
Chinese was generally used to teach certain subjects,
such as arithmetic, and Han Chinese students in
Tibetan areas generally had the option to attend
exclusively Chinese-medium schools. In middle and high
schools--even some officially designated as "Tibetan"
schools--teachers often used Tibetan only to teach
classes in Tibetan language, literature, and culture
and taught many classes in Chinese. As a practical
matter, proficiency in Chinese was essential to
receive a higher education. China's most prestigious
universities provided instruction only in Chinese,
while the lower-ranked universities established to
serve ethnic minorities allowed study of only some
subjects in Tibetan. In general, opportunities to
study at Tibetan-medium schools were greater in the
TAR, while opportunities to study at privately funded
Tibetan-language schools and to receive a traditional
Tibetan-language religious education were greater in
Tibetan areas outside the TAR.
Authorities in Tibetan areas required professors and
students at institutions of higher education to attend
political education sessions and limited course
studies and materials in an effort to prevent
separatist political and religious activities on
campus. The Government controlled curricula, texts,
and other course materials.
There were no formal restrictions on women's
participation in the political system, and women held
many lower-level government positions. However, as in
the rest of China, women were underrepresented at the
provincial and prefectural levels of government.
Prostitution was a growing problem in Tibetan areas,
as it was elsewhere in the country. Hundreds of
brothels operated semi-openly in Lhasa. Up to 10,000
commercial sex workers may have been employed in Lhasa
alone. Some of the prostitution occurred at sites
owned by the Party, the Government, and the military.
Most prostitutes in the TAR were Han Chinese women,
mainly from Sichuan. However, some Tibetans, mainly
young girls from rural or nomadic areas, also worked
as prostitutes. The incidence of HIV/AIDS among
prostitutes in Tibetan areas was unknown, but lack of
knowledge about HIV transmission and economic
pressures on prostitutes to engage in unprotected sex
made an increase in the rate of HIV infection likely.
The TAR Tourism Bureau continued its policy of
refusing to hire Tibetan tour guides educated in India
or Nepal. Government officials have stated that all
tour guides working in the TAR were required to seek
employment with the Tourism Bureau and to pass a
licensing exam on tourism and political ideology. The
Government's stated intent was to ensure that all tour
guides provide visitors with the Government's position
opposing Tibetan independence and the activities of
the Dalai Lama. The Tourist Bureau's monopoly did not
extend to Tibetan areas outside the TAR, and some tour
guides educated abroad reportedly moved to those areas
to seek employment.
The Tibetan-language services of Voice of America and
RFA, as well as of the Oslo-based Voice of Tibet,
suffered from the same jamming of their frequencies by
Chinese authorities as their Chinese-language
services. However, Tibetans were able to listen to the
broadcasts at least some of the time. Unlike in 2003,
there were no reports during the year that Tibetans
were subject to intimidation and fines for listening
to foreign-language broadcasts.
In February, the Tibet Information Network reported
that TAR authorities had banned Tibetan author Oser's
book, "Notes on Tibet," for its politically
"sensitive" content.
In March, RFA reported that authorities had instituted
political education activities at Lhasa-based TV-3 for
airing a program that showed the Tibetan national
flag. The station director reportedly was demoted.
Although the Government made efforts in recent years
to restore some of the physical structures and other
aspects of Tibetan Buddhism and Tibetan culture
damaged or destroyed during the Cultural Revolution,
repressive social and political controls continued to
limit the fundamental freedoms of Tibetans and risked
undermining Tibet's unique cultural, religious, and
linguistic heritage.
HONG KONG
Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of
the People's Republic of China (PRC). The 1984
Sino-British Joint Declaration on the Question of Hong
Kong, and the Basic Law, the SAR's constitution
approved by the PRC in 1990, specify that Hong Kong
will enjoy a high degree of autonomy except in matters
of defense and foreign affairs. This autonomy under
the "one country, two systems" formula in effect since
1997 has been tested severely this year. The Basic Law
provides for the protection of fundamental rights and
calls for progress toward universal suffrage and
further democratization after a 10-year period,
starting with Hong Kong's July 1, 1997, reversion to
Chinese sovereignty. The Chief Executive is chosen by
a selection committee composed of 800 directly
elected, indirectly elected, or appointed individuals.
The Chief Executive appoints and supervises a cabinet
of principal officers. The Basic Law significantly
circumscribes the power of the legislature, the
Legislative Council (Legco). In September 12
elections, voters directly elected 30 members of the
Legco from geographic constituencies and indirectly
elected 30 from functional or occupational
constituencies. Despite isolated allegations of voter
intimidation prior to the election and some
irregularities on election day, the voting was
considered free and fair. Majorities are required in
both the geographic and the functional constituencies
to pass legislation introduced by individual
legislators. Members may not initiate legislation
involving public expenditure, political structure,
government operations, or government policy. The
judiciary is independent, and the Basic Law vests Hong
Kong's highest court with the power of final
adjudication. Under the Basic Law, however, the
Standing Committee of the PRC's National People's
Congress (NPC) has the power of final interpretation
of the Basic Law.
An effective police force under the firm control of
civilian authorities maintained public order. The
Independent Police Complaints Council, made up of
public members appointed by the Chief Executive,
monitored and reviewed the work of an office that
investigated public complaints against the police. The
4,000 Chinese troops sent to Hong Kong in 1997 to
replace the British military garrison have maintained
a low profile and have not performed or interfered in
police functions.
Hong Kong's free market economy is an international
trade, shipping, and finance center as well as a
principal platform for trade and investment with the
PRC. The economy grew 7.5 percent during the year,
with no inflation. Per capita gross domestic product
was approximately $23,000. The population was
approximately 6.8 million.
The Government generally respected the human rights of
residents, and the law and judiciary provided
effective means of dealing with individual instances
of abuse. In April, the Standing Committee of the NPC
ruled out universal suffrage in the next elections for
Chief Executive in 2007 and Legco in 2008. This was an
initiative of the central authorities that cut short
local debate and raised questions about the PRC's
willingness to permit Hong Kong to operate with a high
degree of autonomy. Human rights problems included:
Limitations on residents' ability to change their
government and limitations on the power of the
legislature to affect government policies; allegations
of intimidation of journalists and other media
figures; violence and discrimination against women;
discrimination against ethnic minorities; restrictions
on workers' rights to organize and bargain
collectively; and trafficking in persons for the
purposes of forced labor and prostitution.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person,
Including Freedom From:
a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life
There were no reports of arbitrary or unlawful
deprivations of life committed by the Government or
its agents.
b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated
disappearances.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment
The law forbids torture and other abuse by the police.
There were allegations of assault by police officers
during the year. Disciplinary action can range from
warnings to dismissal. Criminal proceedings may be
undertaken independently of the disciplinary process.
The Complaints Against Police Office (CAPO)
investigates allegations of excessive use of force and
the Independent Police Complaints Council (IPCC), a
body composed of public members appointed by the Chief
Executive, monitors and reviews their work.
During the first half of the year, CAPO received 218
allegations of assault by police officers against
persons in custody and 130 allegations of assault
against persons not in custody, out of a total of
21,562 arrests. Of the 218 allegations of assault by
police officers against persons in custody, 107 case
investigations were completed and endorsed by the
IPCC, and none were substantiated: 79 were withdrawn,
22 were deemed "not pursuable," 4 were judged to be
false, 1 was judged "no fault," and 1 was judged
"unsubstantiated." The remaining 111 cases were
pending as of June 30. Of the 130 allegations of
assault against persons not in custody, 62 case
investigations were completed and endorsed by the
IPCC, and none were substantiated: 45 were withdrawn,
13 were deemed "not pursuable," 1 was judged to be
false, and 3 were judged "unsubstantiated." The
remaining 68 cases were pending as of June 30. In
response to concerns about the police being
responsible for investigating their own misconduct,
the Government drafted a bill to provide a statutory
basis for the IPCC, which would allow it to set up its
own secretariat, receive funding to hire its own
permanent staff, and initiate investigations.
Prison conditions generally met international
standards. Men and women were housed separately,
juveniles were housed separately from adults, and
pretrial detainees were held separately from convicted
prisoners. For the first 6 months of the year, the
average occupancy rate for Hong Kong's 24 prisons was
114 percent. Overcrowding was most serious in maximum
security prisons, which operated at an average
occupancy rate of 136 percent. The Government
continued to address the problem of prison
overcrowding by remodeling existing buildings to
provide space for additional prisoners and
redistributing the prison population. In addition, the
Immigration Department expected its new Detention
Center in Tuen Mun, due to be completed in 2005, to
hold 400 additional people and eliminate the need to
put immigration offenders in prison or other
correctional facilities.
The Government permitted prison visits by human rights
observers. Local justices of the peace regularly
inspected prisons, and, as a standard procedure, these
visits were unannounced.
d. Arbitrary Arrest, Detention, or Exile
Common law, legal precedent, and the Basic Law provide
substantial and effective legal protection against
arbitrary arrest or detention, and the Government
generally observed these provisions in practice.
Suspects must be charged within 48 hours or released.
During the year, the average length of pre conviction
incarceration did not exceed 48 days.
The police force is led by a uniformed Police
Commissioner who reports to the Secretary for
Security--a member of the Chief Executive's Cabinet.
The force had 28,695 officers and was divided into 5
departments with both headquarters and regional
formations. Corruption was not a significant problem
within the force. Police officers are subject to
disciplinary review by CAPO and IPCC in cases of
alleged misconduct (see Section 1.c.).
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The Basic Law provides for an independent judiciary,
and the Government generally respected this provision
in practice. The judiciary, underpinned by the Basic
Law's provision that Hong Kong's common law tradition
be maintained, generally provided citizens with a fair
and efficient judicial process. Under the Basic Law,
the courts may interpret those provisions of the Basic
Law that address matters within the limits of the
SAR's high degree of autonomy. The courts also
interpret provisions of the Basic Law that touch on
PRC central government responsibilities or on the
relationship between the central authorities and the
SAR, but before making final judgments on these
matters, which are unappealable, the courts must seek
an interpretation of the relevant provisions from the
Standing Committee of the NPC. The Basic Law requires
the courts to follow the Standing Committee's
interpretation of Basic Law provisions. Judgments
previously rendered are not affected. The NPC's
mechanism for interpretation is its Committee for the
Basic Law, composed of six mainland and six Hong Kong
members. The Chief Executive, the President of the
Legislative Council, and the Chief Justice nominate
the Hong Kong members. Human rights and lawyers'
organizations have expressed concern that this
process, which circumvents the Court of Final Appeal's
power of final adjudication, could be used to limit
the independence of the judiciary or could degrade the
courts' authority. In the controversial 1999 "right of
abode" case (concerning the right of certain persons
to reside in Hong Kong), the Government, after losing
the case in the Court of Final Appeals, sought a
reinterpretation of relevant Basic Law provisions from
the NPC. There have been no such appeals of court
decisions to the NPC since 1999.
The Court of Final Appeal is the SAR's supreme
judicial body. An independent commission nominates
judges. The Chief Executive is required to appoint
those nominated, subject to endorsement by the
legislature. Nomination procedures ensure that
commission members nominated by the private bar have a
virtual veto on the nominations. The Basic Law
provides that, with the exception of the Chief Justice
and the Chief Judge of the High Court, who are
prohibited from residing outside of Hong Kong,
foreigners may serve on the courts. In 2004,
approximately 23 percent of judges and judicial
officers were expatriates. Judges have security of
tenure until retirement age (either 60 or 65,
depending on the date of appointment).
Under the Court of Final Appeal is the High Court,
composed of the Court of Appeal and the Court of First
Instance. Lower judicial bodies include the District
Court, which has limited jurisdiction in civil and
criminal matters; the magistrates' courts, which
exercise jurisdiction over a wide range of criminal
offenses; the Coroner's Court; the Juvenile Court; the
Lands Tribunal; the Labor Tribunal; the Small Claims
Tribunal; and the Obscene Articles Tribunal.
The law provides for the right to a fair public trial,
and an independent judiciary generally enforced this
right in practice. Trials are by jury except at the
magistrate court level. The judiciary provides
citizens with a fair and efficient judicial process.
Under prosecution rules, there is a presumption of
guilt in official corruption cases. Under the
Prevention of Bribery Ordinance, a current or former
government official who maintains a standard of living
above that commensurate with his official income or
controls monies or property disproportionate to his
official income is, unless he can satisfactorily
explain the discrepancy, guilty of an offense. The
courts have upheld this practice.
According to the Basic Law, English may be used as an
official language by the executive, legislative, and
judicial branches. For historical reasons and because
of the courts' reliance on common law precedents,
almost all civil cases and most criminal cases were
heard in English. In recent years, the Government has
developed a bilingual legal system. It has increased
the number of officers in the Legal Aid Department
proficient in spoken Cantonese and written Chinese and
extended the use of bilingual prosecution documents
and indictments. All laws are bilingual, with the
English and Chinese texts being equally authentic. All
courts and tribunals may operate in either Cantonese
or English. Judges, witnesses, the parties themselves,
and legal representatives each may decide which
language to use at any point in the proceedings.
There were no reports of political prisoners.
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home,
or Correspondence
The law prohibits arbitrary interference with privacy,
family, home, and correspondence, and the Government
generally respected these prohibitions in practice.
Interception of communications is conducted under the
Telecommunications Ordinance and the Post Office
Ordinance. Wiretaps require authorization from the
Chief Executive for interception operations, but a
court issued warrant is not required. The Government
did not reveal the number of wiretaps and mail
interceptions the Chief Executive authorized.
The Office of the Privacy Commissioner for Personal
Data (PCO), established under the Personal Data
(Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO), works to prevent the
misuse, disclosure, or matching of personal data
without the consent of the subject individual or the
commissioner. Some Government departments are exempted
to combat social welfare abuse and tax evasion.
Violations of the PDPO can be either criminal or civil
offenses. Between June 2003 and June 2004, the PCO
investigated 1,109 complaints of suspected breaches of
the ordinance, completing action on 1,047. The PCO
found violations of the PDPO in 26 of these cases,
with none resulting in prosecution. The PCO found
insufficient evidence to prosecute in 243 of the
cases, while the remaining cases were resolved,
rejected, or withdrawn after preliminary inquiries.
The PDPO is not applicable to PRC government organs in
Hong Kong. At year's end, the Government was still
considering whether it should be made applicable to
PRC bodies. Under certain exemptions for purposes
related to safeguarding the security, defense, or
international relations of Hong Kong, and for the
prevention, detection, or prosecution of a crime, Hong
Kong authorities may be allowed to transfer personal
data to a PRC body.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The law provides for freedom of speech and of the
press, and the Government generally respected these
rights in practice. During the year, allegations of
intimidation by pro-Beijing groups and individuals
prior to the September elections raised questions
about these rights. Most Hong Kong media outlets are
owned by businesses with interests on the mainland,
making them vulnerable to self-censorship.
In February and March, the PRC media and local pro-PRC
newspapers ran a series of articles defining
patriotism in Hong Kong. The debate started with an
article in the PRC-owned China Daily citing former
Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping's statement that "only
patriots should govern Hong Kong" and relating this
criterion to the political debate over universal
suffrage in Hong Kong. The PRC media later published
guidelines for patriotic actions, and a local pro-PRC
paper printed the names of those in Hong Kong
perceived to be "unpatriotic." In the midst of the
debate, Jiang Zemin, former president and then
Chairman of the Chinese Central Military Commission
accused Hong Kong's independent Apple Daily newspaper
and two radio hosts of being "hostile forces,"
according to the local East Week magazine.
In May, two popular radio talk show hosts known for
their antigovernment and anti-PRC rhetoric abruptly
left their shows due to alleged intimidation. The two
asserted that a man claiming to represent senior
Beijing officials asked them to stop broadcasting
until after the September election. Police questioned
the man but made no arrest. A third talk show host
received a phone call from a retired mid-level PRC
official, which he perceived as a threat to his
family. Subsequently, the PRC caller stated publicly
that he had no intention of threatening the talk show
host. In September, one of the talk show hosts was
elected to the Legco, and, in October, another became
host of a local television show. At year's end, the
government investigations into these allegations
continued.
In July, the Independent Commission Against Corruption
(ICAC) raided seven newspapers with a warrant to seize
documents related to a corruption case. ICAC staff
also searched the homes of some journalists. The
raided newspapers included pro-PRC, independent, and
pro-democracy newspapers. In August, the Court of
First Instance ruled ICAC's search warrant was "wrong
in fact and in law." On October 11, the Court of
Appeal dismissed ICAC's appeal on technical grounds
but said that ICAC had acted lawfully. The Hong Kong
Journalists' Association, Hong Kong Federation of
Journalists, News Executives' Association, and the
Newspaper Society all issued statements condemning the
raids as violating freedom of the press. The acting
head of ICAC said the agency respects the freedom of
the press, but that it had to strike a balance between
press freedom and the administration of justice.
The Telecommunications Ordinance gives the Government
wide ranging powers to ban messages when it "considers
that the public interest so requires." In practice,
the Government has never invoked this law.
The Basic Law's Article 23 requires the Government to
enact legislation prohibiting treason, secession,
sedition, subversion against the Central People's
Government, theft of state secrets, and links with
foreign political organizations that are harmful to
national security. In 2003, proposed legislation met
with active and widespread public opposition. The
Government withdrew the bill and stated publicly that
it had no plans to reintroduce the legislation.
Individuals criticized the Government publicly and
privately without reprisal, and many persons spoke
freely to the media and used the media to voice their
views. Political debate was vigorous. Varying
viewpoints, including stories and opinions critical of
the SAR and PRC Governments and statements by leading
Chinese dissidents and pro-independence Taiwan
activists, were carried by the mass media, in public
forums, and by political groups.
During the year, newspapers published a wide variety
of opinions, including some sharply critical of the
NPC's decision ruling out universal suffrage in 2007
and 2008. Newspapers also carried opinions on
sensitive topics such as Taiwan, Tibet, PRC leadership
dynamics, Communist Party corruption, and human
rights. There were 16 daily newspapers, all privately
owned in name although 4 were supported
financially--and guided editorially--by the PRC (Wen
Wei Po, Ta Kung Pao, the Hong Kong Commercial Daily,
and the China Daily). The non-PRC-owned newspapers,
hundreds of periodicals, four commercial television
stations (broadcast and cable), and two commercial
radio stations operated freely.
The Government-owned Radio Television Hong Kong
continued to enjoy the editorial independence granted
to it in its framework agreement between the
Government and the station's Director of Broadcasting.
International media organizations operated freely.
Foreign reporters needed no special visas or
government-issued press cards for Hong Kong.
There were no restrictions on the use of the Internet.
The Basic Law provides for academic freedom, and the
Government generally respected that freedom in
practice. There was independent research, a wide range
of opinions, and lively debate on campuses. On July
12, the Legco passed a bill requiring publicly funded
schools operated by voluntary bodies to set up school
management committees including parents and teachers
by 2012. The Anglican and Catholic Churches feared
that these new rules could dilute their authority to
manage the schools they sponsor.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
The Basic Law provides for freedom of assembly and the
Government generally respected this right in practice.
The Government routinely issued the required permits
for public meetings and demonstrations.
Under the law, demonstration organizers must notify
the police of their intention to demonstrate 1 week in
advance. The police accept shorter notice if groups
can satisfy the Commissioner of Police that earlier
notice could not have been given for a march involving
more than 30 persons and for an assembly of more than
50 persons. The police must explicitly object within
48 hours. No reply indicates no objection. The Public
Order Ordinance, which pre-dates the 1997 handover and
which empowers police to object to demonstrations on
national security grounds, has never been invoked. If
the police object, demonstration organizers may appeal
to a statutory appeals board comprising members from
different sectors of society. Both the board's
proceedings and the police's exercise of power are
subject to judicial review.
During the first half of the year, there were about
1,075 public meetings and processions, roughly half of
which required notification. The police did not object
to any demonstrations in the first half of the year.
On January 1, about 100,000 people rallied in support
of universal suffrage and greater democracy with
chants of "return power to the people" and "one man,
one vote." On July 1, 200,000 to 400,000 people
marched through central Hong Kong again in support of
universal suffrage and greater democracy. These events
were legally sanctioned and peaceful.
In addition to holding assemblies and marches on Hong
Kong related issues, groups continued to demonstrate
freely on issues sensitive to the central authorities.
On June 4, approximately 50,000 to 80,000 people
attended a candlelight vigil to commemorate the 15th
anniversary of the 1989 massacre in Beijing's
Tiananmen Square.
Falun Gong practitioners regularly conducted public
protests against the crackdown on fellow practitioners
in the PRC. In November, the Court of Appeal
overturned the 2002 convictions of 16 Falun Gong
practitioners who had been fined for obstructing the
Central Government Liaison Office. The court upheld
convictions against some of the Falun Gong
practitioners for obstructing and assaulting policemen
during their protest. The ruling affirmed that
"fundamental freedoms" of assembly, demonstration, and
expression were protected under the Basic Law.
The Basic Law provides for freedom of association, and
the Government generally respected this right in
practice. Since the 1997 handover, no applications for
registration have been denied. During the first half
of the year, the Societies Licensing Office of the
police registered 974 new organizations.
The Societies Ordinance requires that new societies
apply for registration within 1 month of
establishment. The Government may refuse registration
in the interest of national security, public safety,
public order, or the protection of the rights and
freedom of others. The Government also may refuse to
register a political body that receives support from a
foreign political organization or a Taiwan-based
political organization. There have been no public
reports that the Government has refused registrations
under the Societies Ordinance this year.
c. Freedom of Religion
The Basic Law provides for freedom of religion, the
Bill of Rights Ordinance prohibits religious
discrimination, and the Government generally respected
these provisions in practice.
Religious groups are not required to register with the
Government and are exempt specifically from the
Societies Ordinance. Catholics freely and openly
recognized the Pope as the head of the Church, and the
Vatican maintained a Diocese in the SAR overseen by a
local Bishop. According to the Basic Law, the PRC
Government has no authority over religious practices
in the SAR.
Some groups, such as the Falun Gong and various
traditional Chinese meditation and exercise groups
(known collectively as "qigong" groups) that do not
consider themselves religions, have registered under
the Societies Ordinance. In July, a Falun Gong
practitioner claimed that the group had submitted 72
applications to rent a government venue for its 2001
and 2002 conferences but was told each time that the
venues were already booked. According to the Falun
Gong practitioner, the group later discovered that, on
the relevant dates, one of the requested venues was
empty. Similarly, a private hotel canceled a Falun
Gong banquet room booking because of the group's
"terrorist risk." According to press reports, Falun
Gong successfully sued the hotel in small claims
court.
During April and May, the Government barred 41 Falun
Gong practitioners from entering the SAR for "security
reasons." Most of the practitioners were attempting to
attend Falun Gong's annual conference at a privately
owned facility. Approximately 350 practitioners were
granted entry to attend the conference of
approximately 700 persons.
For a more detailed discussion, see the 2004
International Religious Freedom Report.
d. Freedom of Movement, Foreign Travel, Emigration,
and Repatriation
The Basic Law provides residents freedom of movement
within Hong Kong, freedom of emigration, and freedom
to enter and leave the territory, and the Government
generally respected these rights in practice, with
some prominent exceptions. Most residents obtained
travel documents freely and easily from the SAR
Government. There were limits on travel to the
mainland imposed by the PRC Government.
As was the case before the handover, the Government
does not recognize the Taiwan passport as valid for
visa endorsement purposes.
The law does not provide for, and the Government did
not use, forced exile.
The Government continued to deny some prominent
overseas dissidents entry or visas to enter Hong Kong.
In April, 12 Falun Gong practitioners from Taiwan and
Macau were barred from entering Hong Kong for what
officials described as "security reasons" (see Section
2.c.). In May, the Government denied a request to
allow two 1989 Tiananmen Square student leaders to
enter the SAR to participate in a conference focused
on the Tiananmen Square massacre. Earlier in the year,
other Tiananmen Square student leaders had been
allowed to enter to engage in uncontroversial
activities.
PRC authorities do not permit some Hong Kong human
rights activists and pro-democracy legislators to
visit the mainland. During the year, however, there
were several prominent exceptions. In April, three
pro-democracy Legco members traveled to Shenzhen to
meet with the Deputy Chief of NPC Legislative Affairs
Commission. In July, a political activist filmmaker
was permitted to visit Shanghai, and, in September,
his PRC-issued entry and exit permit was renewed for
10 years. In August, PRC officials denied entry to a
prominent Democratic Party leader but later said this
had been a bureaucratic mistake. And on September 30,
nine newly elected lawmakers from the pro-democracy
coalition went to Beijing to attend National Day
celebrations.
The 1951 U.N. Convention Relating to the Status of
Refugees and its 1967 Protocol do not extend to Hong
Kong, and the SAR eliminated its temporary protection
policy, which was extended only to Vietnamese in 1998.
On a case-by-case basis, the Director of Immigration
has discretion to grant refugee status or asylum in
cases of exceptional humanitarian or compassionate
need, but the Immigration Ordinance does not provide
foreigners any right to have asylum claims recognized.
The Government practice is to refer refugee and asylum
claimants to a lawyer or to the office of the U.N.
High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Those granted
refugee status, as well as those awaiting UNHCR
assessment of their status, receive a UNHCR
subsistence allowance but are not allowed to seek
employment or enroll their children in local schools.
The UNHCR worked with potential host country
representatives to resettle those few persons
designated as refugees. Government policy is to
repatriate all illegal immigrants, including those who
arrive from the mainland, as promptly as possible.
During the first half of the year, 1,683 illegal PRC
immigrants were repatriated to the mainland.
Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of
Citizens to Change Their Government
Residents' right to change their government is limited
by the Basic Law, which provides for the selection of
the Chief Executive by an 800-person selection
committee (composed of individuals who are either
directly elected, indirectly elected, or appointed),
the direct election of only 30 of the 60 Legislative
Council members, and the inclusion of appointed
members to the elected district councils. The approval
of the Chief Executive, two-thirds of the legislature,
and two thirds of Hong Kong's National People's
Congress delegates is required to place an amendment
to the Basic Law originating in Hong Kong on the
agenda of the PRC's National People's Congress, which
has the sole power to amend the Basic Law.
The Government is authorized to exercise a high degree
of autonomy and to enjoy executive, legislative, and
independent judicial power. It contains an executive
branch staffed by a professional and independent civil
service, and a two-tiered legislative branch
consisting of the Legislative Council and 18 district
councils. The Basic Law provides for selection of a
Chief Executive in 1997 and 2002 by the Election
Committee made up of 800 local residents.
The Basic Law permits amendment of the Chief Executive
selection process by a two-thirds majority of the
Legislative Council, with the consent of the Chief
Executive and the National People's Congress Standing
Committee. The Basic Law states that "the ultimate aim
is the selection of the Chief Executive by universal
suffrage upon nomination by a broadly representative
nominating committee in accordance with democratic
procedures." Similarly, the Basic Law states that the
"ultimate aim is the election of all the members of
the Legislative Council by universal suffrage."
In April, the NPC Standing Committee issued a
self-initiated interpretation of the Basic Law cutting
short local debate and rejecting universal suffrage
for Hong Kong in the 2007 and 2008 elections. The NPC
also determined that the current 50-50 ratio for
directly elected geographic seats and indirectly
elected functional constituency seats in Legco must
remain indefinitely in place. In addition, the NPC
narrowed the circumstances in which Legco members
would be permitted to initiate legislation. The NPC
decision left room for amendments to the election
processes, albeit strictly within the limits dictated
by the NPC Standing Committee. During the year, a Task
Force on Constitutional Development solicited local
views on selecting the Chief Executive and the Legco
in 2007 and 2008 in line with the NPC's determination.
In December, the Task Force issued a report, which
included, among other ideas: Expanding the Election
Committee size from 800 to between 1,200 and 1,600 and
broadening its representation; broadening the
representation and size of the group, currently about
163,500 voters, that selects Election Committee
members; and increasing the number of seats in the
Legco from 60 to between 70 and 80, while maintaining
the balance between geographic and functional
constituencies. The Chief Secretary, who heads the
Government's civil service, said that the proposals
made clear that the people expect the Government to
move eventually toward the goal of universal suffrage.
In September, Legislative Council members were elected
to 4-year terms; 30 members were elected directly from
geographic districts through universal suffrage, and
30 from functional or occupational constituencies.
Candidates who considered themselves democracy
advocates won 18 of the 30 seats elected on a
geographic basis and 25 seats overall. There were
199,539 persons eligible to vote in the functional
constituencies.
Prior to the September elections, several newspapers
reported that some pro-PRC companies and organizations
were demanding that staff use their mobile phone
cameras to photograph their ballots. In response to
these allegations, which pro-PRC candidates denied,
the Electoral Commission banned mobile phone cameras
in the polling booths and removed booth curtains so
that polling officials could view booth activity. No
incidents of ballot photographing were reported.
The Government was criticized for not having enough
ballot boxes at the polls on Election Day. Ballot box
shortages forced some polling stations to close
temporarily and caused long lines and delays. There
were accusations that some election officials opened
sealed ballot boxes in order to make room for
additional ballots. Premature opening of ballot boxes
is considered a violation of international election
standards. There were no accusations of ballot
tampering connected with the incidents, and it was
generally believed that there was no systematic effort
to illegally alter the outcome of the election. The
Electoral Affairs Commission conducted an
investigation and issued a report in December stating
that a ballot box design flaw led to the problems but
that the integrity of the election was not affected.
The Electoral Affairs Commission received more than
1,600 complaints on Election Day—-up from 1,427
complaints during the 2000 election. Approximately 25
percent involved complaints about the nuisance caused
by candidates' loudspeakers, advertisements, and
telephone canvassing. Election guidelines call for
campaign-free zones outside the polling stations,
specify how advertisements should be prepared,
recommend that advertisements carry the name and
address of the publisher, and require all statements
to be factually accurate. Approximately 10 percent of
the complaints were about voting arrangements, such as
long lines and the shortage of ballot boxes. There
were six complaints of bribery and one complaint of
coercion. The Electoral Affairs Commission promised to
investigate thoroughly all complaints. Meanwhile, the
ICAC received and is working on 87 complaints
regarding the election -up slightly from 2000.
The Basic Law substantially limits the ability of the
legislature to influence policy by requiring separate
majorities among members elected from geographical and
functional constituencies to pass a bill introduced by
an individual member. Another Basic Law provision
prohibits the Legislative Council from putting forward
bills that affect public expenditure, political
structure, or government operations. Bills that affect
government policy cannot be introduced without the
Chief Executive's written consent. The Government has
adopted a very broad definition of "government policy"
in order to block private member bills, and the
President of the Legislative Council has upheld the
Government's position.
The Executive Council (Exco) functions as the Chief
Executive's cabinet. Exco includes 11 political
appointees who run the 11 policy bureaus, and the
Chief Secretary, Financial Secretary, and Justice
Secretary, who are also political appointees. These 14
members are chosen by the Chief Executive and approved
by the PRC Government. The Exco also includes members
of two political parties, a labor leader, and two
other private citizens, also appointed by the Chief
Executive.
District Councils are responsible for advising the
Government on matters affecting: (1) the well being of
district residents; (2) the provision and use of
public facilities; and (3) the use of public funds
allocated for local public works and community
activities. The District Council Ordinance gives the
Chief Executive authority to appoint 102 out of 529 of
the District Councilors, and he exercises this power
in practice.
Hong Kong sends 36 delegates to the PRC's National
People's Congress (NPC). In 2002, Hong Kong's NPC
delegates were elected to a 5-year term by an
NPC-appointed committee of 955 residents. Politicians
and human rights activists criticized the election
process as undemocratic and lacking transparency. In
September, for the first time in Hong Kong's history,
two local NPC delegates won directly elected seats in
the Legco. One NPC delegate lost his bid for a
directly elected Legco seat.
The Government vigorously and with apparent success
combated official corruption through the Prevention of
Bribery Ordinance and the Independent Commission
Against Corruption.
The law provides for access to government information,
and, in practice, such information was provided to
both citizens and non-citizens with exceptions that
are narrowly defined and could be appealed.
Women hold 11 of the 60 Legislative Council seats (the
same number as in the previous Legislative Council)
and made up between 17 and 23 percent of membership in
the major political parties. The President of the
previous Legislative Council was a woman, as are the
heads of several government departments. More than
one-third of civil servants were women, and 2 of the
15 most senior Government officials were women.
There were no ethnic minorities in the Legislative
Council, but there were a number of ethnic minorities
in senior civil service positions.
Section 4 Governmental Attitude Regarding
International and Nongovernmental Investigation of
Alleged Violations of Human Rights
A wide variety of domestic and international human
rights groups generally operated without government
restriction, investigating and publishing their
findings on human rights cases. These organizations
had unrestricted contacts with the local community and
with groups overseas. Government officials were
generally receptive to, and respectful of, their
views. Prominent human rights activists critical of
the PRC also operated freely and maintained permanent
resident status in Hong Kong, but overseas dissidents
sometimes had difficulty gaining entry to the SAR.
Under the Basic Law, the International Covenant on
Civil and Political Rights and the International
Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights
apply to Hong Kong. The PRC Government transmits Hong
Kong's reports, mandated under these covenants,
without editing, to the U.N. The SAR Government and
several domestic NGOs have testified before several
U.N. human rights committees, including the U. N.
Human Rights Commission in Geneva. The hearings,
including the Commission's concerns, have received
widespread and balanced press coverage.
The Office of the Ombudsman has wide powers to
investigate and report on public grievances stemming
from administrative actions of the executive branch
and other designated public bodies. The Ombudsman may
protect complainants when publishing investigative
reports. In addition to responding to public
complaints, the Ombudsman also initiates
investigations. The Ombudsman has the option of
reporting directly to the Chief Executive if
organizations refuse to act upon his recommendations,
or if the violations are considered serious. The Chief
Executive is bound by law to present such reports to
the legislature. The Ombudsman (Amendment) Ordinance,
passed in 2001, strengthened the independence of the
Ombudsman by de-linking the office from government
systems and processes. It empowers the office to set
terms and conditions of appointment for staff and to
manage its own financial and administrative matters.
The Ombudsman does not have oversight authority over
the police, the Independent Commission Against
Corruption, or the Office of the Privacy Commissioner
for Personal Data, although it may investigate
complaints of noncompliance with the code on access to
information by government departments, including the
police and the Independent Commission Against
Corruption. With regard to election-related
complaints, the Ombudsman may investigate only those
complaints made against the Registration and Electoral
Office, not those made against the Electoral Affairs
Commission.
Section 5 Discrimination Based on Race, Sex,
Disability, Language, or Social Status
The Basic Law provides that all Hong Kong residents
are equal before the law. The Bill of Rights
Ordinance, which incorporates into law the
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,
entitles residents to the civil and political rights
recognized therein "without distinction of any kind,
such as race, color, sex, language, religion,
political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status." The ordinance
applies only to the Government, public authorities,
and persons acting on their behalf. It does not apply
to private persons or entities. Three pieces of
anti-discrimination legislation--the Sex
Discrimination Ordinance, the Disability
Discrimination Ordinance, and the Family Status
Discrimination Ordinance--make it illegal for any
person or entity (public or private) to discriminate
on the grounds of sex, marital status, pregnancy,
disability, or family status, and prohibits behavior
such as sexual harassment, harassment or vilification
on the grounds of disability, and discriminatory
advertising. The Disability Discrimination Ordinance
also protects persons with HIV/AIDS from
discrimination, and permits them to take legal action
or seek assistance from the Equal Opportunity
Commission (EOC) through the formal complaint process.
The EOC was established in 1996 to help eliminate
discrimination and to promote equality of opportunity
without regard to gender, disability, and family
status. In December, the Government appointed the
former Privacy Commissioner to a 5-year term as EOC
Commissioner.
During the first half of the year, the EOC received
275 complaints, of which 261 required investigation
and conciliation. The Commission concluded 381 cases,
including cases from previous years. Of these, 168
were discontinued for various reasons, including
withdrawal by the complainant, agreement reached
before an investigation was completed, and a lack of
substance. Of the remaining concluded cases, 114 were
successfully conciliated. Legal assistance remains
available for unsuccessful complainants.
Women
Local public health officials remain concerned about
violence against women, particularly among new
immigrants from the mainland. The Domestic Violence
Ordinance allows a woman to seek a 3 month injunction,
extendable to 6 months, against her husband. Domestic
violence also may be prosecuted as common assault. The
Government enforced the law and prosecuted violators,
but sentences typically consisted only of injunctions
or restraining orders. During the first half of the
year, there were 3,298 cases of domestic violence
reported to the Social Welfare Department, which
receives reports from the police, social workers, the
Health Department, and volunteer organizations.
The Government funded programs such as family life
education counseling, a hotline service, temporary
housing, legal aid, and child protective services. It
also sponsored public education and media programs
through the Women's Commission to promote public
awareness and encourages women to seek early
professional assistance.
There were 46 cases of rape reported to the police
during the first half of the year and 70 in all of
2003. The 2002 Statute Law (Miscellaneous Provisions)
Bill criminalizes marital rape. In 2003, the
legislature passed an amendment to the Crimes
Ordinance expressly clarifying that the term "unlawful
sexual intercourse" could be applied both outside and
inside the bounds of marriage. During the first half
of the year, 492 indecent assault cases were reported
to the police.
In April, Amnesty International criticized the
Government for failing to take appropriate action
prior to the killings of a mother and her two
daughters. The police launched an internal
investigation after acknowledging that the woman
sought help at a police station hours before her
husband allegedly killed her. An investigation by the
Social Welfare Department determined that the local
district government where the killings occurred lacked
adequate social services to deal with its expanding
population. In November, the Secretary for Health,
Welfare and Food announced that more resources would
be allocated to tackle the problem of domestic
violence.
The number of women seeking help from the crisis
center for victims of sexual violence more than
tripled from 2001. The center handled 99 cases in the
first half of the year. A study released by the center
during the year showed that many women were reluctant
to come forward, with one in six victims waiting as
long as 10 years before reporting an attack.
Prostitution is legal, but there are laws against
activities such as causing or procuring another to be
a prostitute, living on the prostitution of others, or
keeping a vice establishment. Hong Kong is a transit
and destination point for persons trafficked for the
purposes of sexual exploitation (see Section 5,
Trafficking.).
The Sex Discrimination Ordinance prohibits sexual
harassment of women seeking employment or already
working in an organization. The EOC reported 40 sexual
harassment complaints in the first half of the year.
In August, the Government agreed to amend the
ordinance to extend the definition of sexual
harassment in schools in order to prevent sexually
hostile environments. The change, proposed by the EOC,
would close a loophole that allowed behavior in
schools that is banned in the workplace. It covers
conduct not specifically directed at a person, such as
chanting obscene slogans or displaying posters with
sexual content. The changes were proposed in response
to allegations of sexual harassment at a Chinese
University orientation camp in 2002.
Women faced discrimination in employment, salary,
welfare, inheritance, and promotion. A survey released
in March found that nearly 80 percent of women workers
feel they are the victims of discrimination.
Women entered professional fields, including sciences
and engineering, law, teaching, accounting, social
sciences, health, and medicine, in growing numbers. As
of June, 35.1 percent of professionals employed in
these fields were women. About 21 percent of judicial
officers and judges were women. In the Legislative
Council, women held 11 of the 60 seats. According to a
survey released in February, about three-quarters of
private companies have women in senior management
positions, and women occupied more than a quarter of
the senior management posts. Women were still
disproportionately represented in the lower echelons
of the work force.
The law treats men and women equally in inheritance
matters, although women still faced discrimination
based on traditional practices, such as in the
inheritance of homes in rural areas of the New
Territories.
Children
The Government supported children's rights and welfare
through well-funded systems of public education,
medical care, and protective services. The Education
Department provided schooling for children between 6
and 15 years of age and placement services for
non-Chinese speaking children. Education is free and
compulsory through grade nine. The Government
supported programs for custody, protection, day care,
foster care, shelters, small group homes, and
assistance to families.
The Government provided subsidized, quality medical
care for all children who are residents.
In 2003, legislation raised the age of criminal
responsibility for children from 7 to 10 years. During
the first half of the year, there were 86 youths under
the age of 16 who were incarcerated: 19 in prison, 15
in training centers, 25 in detention centers, 25 in
rehabilitation centers, and 2 in drug addiction
treatment centers.
Statistics on child abuse and exploitation were
limited. During the first half of the year, there were
459 child abuse cases reported to the police: 257
involved physical abuse (referring to victims under 14
years of age) and 202 involved sexual abuse (referring
to victims under 17 years of age).
In December 2003, the Government enacted the
Prevention of Child Pornography Ordinance, which
criminalizes the making, production, distribution,
publication, advertising, and possession of child
pornography. It also prohibits the procurement of
children for making pornography, extends the
application of certain sexual offense provisions to
acts committed against children outside of Hong Kong,
and prohibits any arrangement or advertising relating
to commission of those acts. In May, police used the
new law to conduct a sweep of child pornography
websites and arrested 18 persons.
The Government provided parent education programs in
all 50 of the Department of Health's Maternal and
Child Health Centers, which included instruction on
child abuse prevention. The Social Welfare Department
commissioned research on domestic violence, including
child abuse. The police maintained a child abuse
investigation unit and a child witness support
program. A Child Care Center Law helps prevent
unsuitable persons from providing childcare services
and facilitates the formation of mutual help childcare
groups. There are substantial legal penalties for
mistreatment or neglect of minors.
Trafficking in Persons
There is no law prohibiting trafficking in persons.
There are various laws and ordinances that allow law
enforcement authorities to take action against
traffickers. Despite robust efforts by the SAR
Government to stop such activities, Hong Kong was a
point of transit and destination for persons
trafficked for sexual exploitation and forced labor
from China and Southeast Asia. It was difficult for
the Government to identify trafficking victims from
among the larger group of illegal immigrants.
Traffickers have used forged or illegally obtained
travel documents to attempt to smuggle persons through
the Hong Kong airport. During the first half of the
year, authorities intercepted 1,288 forged travel
documents and arrested 12 persons for related
offenses.
A Hong Kong University study on the trafficking of
women for the purposes of prostitution found that from
1990 to 2000, there were 39 cases of women lured to
Hong Kong with false promises of legitimate employment
who were forced or coerced to work as prostitutes.
Large numbers of illegal immigrant women from the
mainland voluntarily engaged in prostitution with the
reported assistance of organized criminal groups.
Prostitution is legal, but there are laws against some
related activities that make prostitution illegal in
certain circumstances (see Section 5, Women). The
authorities combat illegal prostitution by
nonresidents through strict immigration controls and
by arresting and prosecuting illegal prostitutes and
their employers. During the first half of the year,
5,133 nonresident women prostitutes were arrested.
Most of those arrested were deported rather than
formally charged. The police do not keep statistics on
the number of persons arrested who are employers of
prostitutes. However, the Crimes Ordinance stipulates
that a person who controls another person for purposes
of prostitution can, upon conviction and indictment,
be imprisoned for 14 years, and a person who knowingly
lives wholly or in part on the earnings of
prostitution of another can be sentenced to 10 years'
imprisonment. During the first half of the year, 41
persons were convicted of these offenses, and, in
2003, 119 people were convicted. The majority of those
convicted were sentenced to immediate imprisonment.
During the year, there were no known reports of
persons being trafficked into the SAR to work as
domestics.
Provisions in the Immigration Ordinance, the Crimes
Ordinance, and other relevant laws enabled law
enforcement authorities to take action against
trafficking in persons. The courts can impose heavy
fines and prison sentences for up to 14 years for such
activities as arranging passage of unauthorized
entrants into Hong Kong, assisting unauthorized
entrants to remain, using or possessing a forged,
false or unlawfully obtained travel document, and
aiding and abetting any person to use such a document.
The Security Bureau is responsible for combating
migrant trafficking and overseeing the police,
customs, and immigration departments, which are
responsible for enforcing anti-trafficking laws. Law
enforcement officials received special training on
handling and protecting victims and vulnerable
witnesses, including victims of trafficking.
The Government provided legal aid to those taking
legal action against an employer, and immunity from
prosecution for those who assist in the investigation
and prosecution of traffickers. The Social Welfare
Department and local NGOs also provided an array of
social services to victims of trafficking. The
Government did not provide funding to foreign or
domestic NGOs for services to victims. The Government
also tried to prevent trafficking by distributing
pamphlets, in a wide range of languages, to workers
about their rights.
Persons with Disabilities
Discrimination against physically and mentally
disabled persons persisted in employment, education,
and the provision of some public services. The
Disability Discrimination Ordinance calls for improved
building access and sanctions against those who
discriminate. Also, the Buildings Ordinance was
amended in 2003 to update design requirements.
However, despite inspections and the occasional
closure of noncompliant businesses, access to public
buildings (including public schools) and
transportation remained a serious problem for persons
with disabilities.
The Government offered an integrated work program in
sheltered workshops and provided vocational assessment
and training. No comprehensive statistics were
available on the number of persons with disabilities
in the work force, but the last government survey
conducted in 2000 estimated that there were
approximately 269,500 persons with one or more
disabilities, including 225,600 persons with physical
disabilities and 52,700 with mental disabilities.
According to the survey, of the 269,500 persons with
disabilities, 52,500 were employed and 59,700 were
considered "economically active," including small
business owners and street vendors. However, a
consortium of organizations representing persons with
disabilities reported in 2002 that approximately
700,000 residents were disabled, about half of whom
were able to work. As of June 30, there were 3,162
persons with disabilities employed as civil servants
out of a total civil service work force of 163,101.
During the first half of the year, the Labor
Department's Selective Placement Division found jobs
for 1,057 of 2,226 disabled job seekers. Approximately
10,400 students out of a school population of 840,000
(1.2 percent) were disabled.
The EOC sponsored a variety of activities to address
discrimination against persons with disabilities,
including youth education programs, distributing
guidelines and resources for employers, carrying out
media campaigns, and co-sponsoring seminars and
research.
National/Racial/Ethnic Minorities
At year's end, a bill to prohibit racial
discrimination in employment, education, provision of
goods and services, use and renting of facilities or
household properties, consultative and mandatory
organizations, lawyers' apprenticeship practices, and
government and public bodies was on the Legco's agenda
for 2004 05.
The Government's legally non-binding "Code of Practice
for Employers," put into place in 2001 and designed to
prevent discrimination, states that race, among other
factors, should not be considered when hiring
employees. The Government's Race Relations Unit funded
numerous projects promoting racial harmony.
Minorities, who make up approximately 5.1 percent of
the population, were well represented in the civil
service and many professions. Foreign domestic
workers, most of whom are from the Philippines and
Indonesia, may be vulnerable to discrimination. An
Indonesian Migrant Workers Union was established in
2000 to unite Indonesian domestic helpers throughout
Asia to protect members from abuse and exploitation.
The organization served the approximately 87,850
Indonesian domestic helpers who worked in the SAR.
Similar organizations worked for the interests of
Philippine domestic helpers, of whom there were
approximately 121,500.
Section 6 Worker Rights
a. The Right of Association
The law provides for the right of association and the
right of workers to establish and join organizations
of their own choosing. Trade unions must register
under the Trade Unions Ordinance. The basic
precondition for registration is a minimum membership
of seven persons. The Trade Unions Ordinance does not
restrict union membership to a single trade, industry,
or occupation and the Government did not discourage or
impede the formation of unions. Trade unions were
independent of political parties and the Government.
During the first half of the year, 12 new unions were
registered, while 3 were deregistered; there were 698
registered trade unions. In 2003, 21.8 percent of the
3,066,800 salaried employees and wage earners belonged
to a labor organization.
The Employment Ordinance includes provisions that
protect against anti-union discrimination. Violation
is a criminal offense with a maximum fine of $12,800
(HK$100,000). Employees who allege such discrimination
have the right to have their cases heard by the Labor
Relations Tribunal. The Tribunal may order
reinstatement of the employee, subject to mutual
consent of the employer and employee. The Tribunal may
award statutory entitlements (for instance, severance
pay) and compensation. The maximum amount of
compensation is $19,230 (HK$150,000). Some labor
activists have complained that the Labor Tribunals
tended to push conciliation rather than issue orders.
The Basic Law commits the SAR to 41 International
Labor Organization (ILO) conventions, and the
Government has amended labor legislation and taken
administrative measures to comply.
The Employment and Labor Relations (Miscellaneous
Amendments) Ordinance permits the cross-industry
affiliation of labor union federations and
confederations and allows free association with
overseas trade unions. Notification of the Labor
Department within 1 month of affiliation is required.
b. The Right to Organize and Bargain Collectively
In 1997, the pre-handover Legislative Council passed
three laws that greatly expanded the collective
bargaining powers of workers, protected them from
summary dismissal for union activity, and permitted
union activity on company premises and time. Had they
not been amended, the new ordinances would have
enabled full implementation of ILO Conventions 87, 98,
and 154. However, in 1997, after consultation with the
Labor Advisory Board, the Provisional Legislature
repealed the Employee's Right to Representation,
Consultation, and Collective Bargaining Ordinance and
the Employment (Amendment) Ordinance, and amended the
Trade Union (Amendment) Ordinance. The repeals removed
the new legislation's statutory protection against
summary dismissal for union activity; the Government
asserted that existing law already offered adequate
protection against unfair dismissal arising from
anti-union discrimination.
The 1997 Employment and Labor Relations (Miscellaneous
Amendments) Ordinance removes the legal stipulation of
trade unions' right to engage employers in collective
bargaining. The ordinance bans the use of union funds
for political purposes, requires the Chief Executive's
approval before unions can contribute funds to any
trade union outside of the SAR, and restricts the
appointment of persons from outside the enterprise or
sector to union executive committees. In a few trades
such as tailoring and carpentry, wage rates were
determined collectively in accordance with established
trade practices and customs rather than a statutory
mechanism, but collective bargaining was not practiced
widely. Unions were not powerful enough to force
management to engage in collective bargaining. The
Government did not engage in collective bargaining
with civil servants' unions.
The Workplace Consultation Promotion Unit in the Labor
Department facilitated communication, consultation,
and voluntary negotiation between employers and
employees. Tripartite committees for each of nine
sectors of the economy included representatives from
trade unions, employers, and the Labor Department.
Work stoppages and strikes are legal. There are some
restrictions on this right for civil servants.
Although there is no legislative prohibition of
strikes, in practice, most workers had to sign
employment contracts that typically stated that
walking off the job is a breach of contract, which
could lead to summary dismissal.
There were a number of labor stoppages during the
year, including a series of strikes by swimming pool
lifeguards concerning staff and pay cuts. Chicken
wholesalers struck over an avian flu-related ban on
imports of mainland origin chicken.
There are no export processing zones.
c. Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labor
The law prohibits forced or compulsory labor. Although
the law does not specifically prohibit forced or
compulsory labor by children, there were no reports
that such practices occurred.
d. Prohibition of Child Labor and Minimum Age for
Employment
The Employment of Children Regulations prohibit
employment of children under the age of 15 in any
industrial establishment. Children 13 and 14 years of
age may work in certain non industrial establishments,
subject to conditions aimed at ensuring a minimum of 9
years' education and protecting their safety, health,
and welfare. The Labor Department conducted regular
workplace inspections to enforce compliance with the
regulations. During the first half of the year, the
Labor Department conducted 57,936 inspections and
discovered one violation of the Employment of Children
Regulations, resulting in the assessment of $450
(HK$3,500) in fines. The regulations limit work hours
in the manufacturing sector for persons 15 to 17 years
of age to 8 hours per day and 48 hours per week
between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. They also prohibit, for
persons under 18 years of age, overtime in industrial
establishments with employment in dangerous trades.
e. Acceptable Conditions of Work
There is no statutory minimum wage except for domestic
workers of foreign origin. Aside from a small number
of trades where a uniform wage structure exists, wage
levels customarily are fixed by individual agreement
between employer and employee and are determined by
supply and demand. Some employers provided workers
with various kinds of allowances, free medical
treatment, and free subsidized transport. The average
wage generally provided a decent standard of living
for a worker and family. Two-income households were
the norm. There are no regulations concerning working
hours, paid weekly rest, rest breaks, or compulsory
overtime.
The minimum wage for foreign domestic workers was
approximately $419 per month (HK$3,270). The standard
workweek was 48 hours, but many domestic workers
worked far longer hours. The standard contract law
requires employers to provide foreign domestic workers
with housing, worker's compensation insurance, travel
allowances, and food or a food allowance in addition
to the minimum wage, which together provide a decent
standard of living. Foreign domestic workers can be
deported if dismissed. During the first half of the
year, 48 foreign domestic workers filed suit for
maltreatment.
The Occupational Safety and Health Branch of the Labor
Department is responsible for safety and health
promotion, enforcement of safety management
legislation, as well as policy formulation and
implementation.
The Factories and Industrial Undertakings Ordinance,
the Occupational Safety and Health Ordinance, the
Boilers and Pressure Vessels Ordinance, and their 35
sets of subsidiary regulations regulate safety and
health conditions. During the first half of the year,
the Labor Department conducted 61,707 inspections of
workplaces and issued 983 summonses, resulting in a
total of $1,312,500 (HK$10,237,900) in fines. Worker
safety and health has improved over the years, but
serious problems remained, particularly in the
construction industry. During the first half of the
year, there were 9,820 occupational injuries, of which
3,934 were classified as industrial accidents. There
were 10 fatal industrial accidents. Employers are
required under the Employee's Compensation Ordinance
to report any injuries sustained by their employees in
work-related accidents. There is no specific legal
provision allowing workers to remove themselves from
dangerous work situations without jeopardy to
continued employment.
MACAU
Macau, a 13-square-mile enclave on the south China
coast, reverted from Portuguese to Chinese
administration in 1999. As a Special Administrative
Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China (PRC),
Macau enjoys a high degree of autonomy except in
defense and foreign affairs, and its citizens have
basic freedoms and enjoy legally protected rights. The
Basic Law is the SAR's constitution, promulgated by
PRC's National People's Congress (NPC) in 1993. The
1987 Sino-Portuguese Joint Declaration and the Basic
Law specify that the SAR is to continue to enjoy
substantial autonomy and its economic system and way
of life are to remain unchanged for the first 50 years
under PRC sovereignty. The Government is led by a
chief executive, chosen by a 300-member election
committee, which in turn is chosen by a preparatory
committee composed of 60 SAR and 40 mainland
representatives appointed by the NPC. In August, the
committee re-elected Edmund Ho to a second term as
Chief Executive. The most recent legislative elections
were in 2001, when voters elected 10 of the
legislature's 27 members in direct elections based on
geographical constituencies. Interest groups in
functional constituencies elected 10 others, and the
Chief Executive appointed the remaining 7 members.
There are limits on the types of bills that may be
initiated by individual members of the legislature.
The judiciary is independent.
The Public Security Police, which was created at the
time of the handover through a merger of the various
police force branches, has primary responsibility for
law enforcement and maintenance of public order. The
civilian authorities maintained effective control of
the police. The People's Liberation Army maintained a
garrison of approximately 800 soldiers in the SAR.
According to the Macau Garrison Law, the Chief
Executive can call on the garrison to maintain public
order, but it has never been used for this purpose.
There were no reports that security forces committed
human rights abuses.
The market-based economy was fueled by textile and
garment exports, infrastructure investment, and
construction, along with tourism and gambling. The
population was approximately 461,000. The economy grew
at an annual rate of 30.5 percent in the first 9
months of the year.
The Government generally respected the human rights of
its citizens; however, there were problems in some
areas. These problems included the limited ability of
citizens to change their government, limits on the
legislature's ability to initiate legislation, and a
lack of legal protection for strikes and collective
bargaining rights.
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS
Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person,
Including Freedom From:
a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life
There were no reports of the arbitrary or unlawful
deprivation of life committed by the Government or its
agents.
There were no reports of suspicious deaths in custody.
The Public Prosecutions Office filed a criminal
investigation concerning one of the Judiciary Police
officers involved in the 2002 death of a prisoner in
custody. An investigation into the conduct of a second
officer was ongoing at year's end.
b. Disappearance
There were no reports of politically motivated
disappearances.
c. Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading
Treatment or Punishment
The law prohibits such practices, and the Government
generally respected these provisions in practice.
During the year, there were 21 reports of police
brutality, compared with no reports in 2003.
Prison conditions met international standards, and the
Government permitted visits by independent human
rights observers. As of October, the prison population
was 872, almost one-quarter of whom were from the PRC.
At year's end, the SAR and the PRC had not reached an
agreement on prisoner transfers. Female prisoners were
held separately from male prisoners, juveniles were
held separately from adults, and pretrial detainees
were separated from convicted prisoners.
d. Arbitrary Arrest or Detention
The law prohibits arbitrary arrest and detention, and
the Government generally observed these prohibitions.
Civilian authorities, specifically the Secretary for
Security, supervised and controlled the police. The
Public Security Police was well disciplined. The
Commission Against Corruption acted to preclude
problems with corruption.
Police must present persons remanded in custody to an
examining judge within 48 hours of detention. The
examining judge, who conducts a pretrial inquiry in
criminal cases, has a wide range of powers to collect
evidence, order or dismiss indictments, and determine
whether to release detained persons. The accused
person's counsel may examine the evidence. The law
provides that cases must come to trial within 6 months
of an indictment. The estimated average length of
pretrial incarceration was 3 to 6 months. Judges often
refused bail in cases where sentences could exceed 3
years.
e. Denial of Fair Public Trial
The law provides for an independent judiciary, and the
Government generally respected this provision in
practice. According to the Basic Law, the courts have
the power of final adjudication in all cases that are
within the authority of the SAR. The courts also may
rule on matters that are "the responsibility of the
Central People's Government or concern the
relationship between the central authorities and the
[Special Administrative] Region"; however, before
making their final judgment (a judgment not subject to
appeal), the courts must seek an interpretation of the
relevant provisions from the NPC's Standing Committee.
When the Standing Committee makes an interpretation of
the provisions concerned, the courts, in applying
those provisions, "shall follow the interpretation of
the Standing Committee." The Standing Committee must
consult the NPC's Committee for the Basic Law of the
SAR before giving an interpretation of the law. This
committee is composed of 10 members, 5 from the SAR
and 5 from the mainland. The Chief Executive, the
President of the Legislative Assembly, and the
President of the Court of Final Appeal nominate the
SAR members.
The Basic Law provides for the use of Portuguese, in
addition to Chinese, as an official language by
executive authorities, the legislature, and the
judiciary. The need to translate laws and judgments
from Portuguese and a severe shortage of local
bilingual lawyers and magistrates have hampered
development of the legal system. At year's end, there
were 105 lawyers in private practice in the SAR, of
whom 14 spoke Mandarin and Cantonese and 27 spoke only
Cantonese. The Government sponsored a postgraduate
training program for magistrates who had received
legal training outside of the SAR. The judiciary was
relatively inexperienced and lacked locally trained
lawyers. The first law school in the SAR opened in the
early 1990s.
According to the Basic Law, the Chief Executive
appoints judges at all levels, acting on the
recommendation of an independent commission, which he
appoints. The commission is composed of local judges,
lawyers, and "eminent persons." The Basic Law
stipulates that judges must be chosen on the basis of
their professional qualifications. Judges may be
removed only for criminal acts or an inability to
discharge their functions. Except for the Chief
Justice, who must be a Chinese citizen with no right
of abode elsewhere, judges may be foreigners.
There are four courts: the Primary Court, with general
jurisdiction of first instance; the Administrative
Court, with jurisdiction of first instance in
administrative disputes; the Court of Second Instance;
and the Court of Final Appeal.
The law provides for the right to a fair trial, and
the judiciary generally enforced this right. By law,
trials are open to the public, except when publicity
could cause great harm to the dignity of the persons,
to public morals, or to the normal development of the
trial. A decision to close off a trial must be revoked
if those factors cease to exist, and the verdict must
always be delivered in public. The Criminal Procedure
Code provides for an accused person's right to be
present during proceedings and to choose an attorney
or request that one be provided at government expense.
The Organized Crime Ordinance provides that "certain
procedural acts may be held without publicity and that
witness statements read in court are admissible as
evidence." There also are additional restrictions on
the granting of bail and suspended sentences in
organized crime cases.
The judiciary provides citizens with a fair and
efficient judicial process; however, at times, a
period of up to a year passed between the filing of a
civil case and its scheduled hearing.
A Public Prosecutor General heads the Public
Prosecutions Office. It enjoys substantial autonomy
from both the executive and the judiciary. The Basic
Law stipulates that the Public Prosecutions Office's
functions must be carried out without interference,
and the Government generally respected the law in
practice.
There were no reports of political prisoners.
f. Arbitrary Interference with Privacy, Family, Home,
or Correspondence
The law prohibits such actions, and the Government
generally respected these prohibitions in practice. A
judge's authorization is required for any official
interference in these areas. Any evidence obtained by
means of wrongful interference in private life, home,
correspondence, or telecommunications without the
consent of the concerned person may not be used in
court.
Section 2 Respect for Civil Liberties, Including:
a. Freedom of Speech and Press
The law provides for freedom of speech and of the
press, and the Government generally respected these
rights in practice and did not restrict academic
freedom. Local law also protects a citizen's right to
petition the Government and the legislature.
The print media included eight Chinese-language
dailies, three Portuguese-language dailies, one
Portuguese-language weekly, and six Chinese-language
weeklies. There were three television networks: Two
broadcast in Mandarin, and the other included a mix of
Portuguese, English, and Cantonese programming. Macau
Radio broadcast in both Portuguese and Chinese
(Cantonese and Mandarin). Hong Kong and international
newspapers were widely available. The dominant
newspapers, mainly Chinese-language, supported PRC
government positions in their editorial line, while
some of the Portuguese-language press published
articles critical of mainland policies, such as those
regarding Tibet and Falun Gong. The Union for
Democracy Development Macau (UDDM), a nongovernmental
organization (NGO) headed by pro-democracy
legislators, charged that newspapers did not give
equal attention to liberal and pro-democracy voices.
At least three leading daily newspapers and a leading
Hong Kong daily newspaper sold in the SAR provided
extensive coverage of pro-democracy activities. The
press regularly published articles critical of the
Government, with opinion columns often directly
criticizing government officials.
Article 23 of the Basic Law obliges the SAR to enact
legislation that would forbid any act of treason,
secession, sedition, subversion against the PRC
Government; theft of state secrets; or links to
foreign political organizations harmful to national
security. At year's end, the Government had not
enacted any such legislation. The Portuguese law
dealing with crimes against state security became null
and void after the handover, and no new law has
replaced it.
There were no government-imposed limits on Internet
access.
b. Freedom of Peaceful Assembly and Association
The law provides for freedom of assembly, and the
Government generally respected this right in practice.
Under local law, individuals and groups intending to
hold peaceful meetings or demonstrations in public
places are required to notify the president of the
relevant municipal council in writing at least 3 days,
but no more than 2 weeks, in advance of the event. No
prior authorization is necessary for the event to take
place. Local law also provides criminal penalties for
government officials who unlawfully impede or attempt
to impede the right of assembly and for
counter-demonstrators who interfere in meetings or
demonstrations.
The law provides for freedom of association, and the
Government generally respected this right in practice.
The law neither provides for, nor prohibits
establishment of, political parties. Under the
Societies Ordinance, persons can establish "political
organizations." Several such organizations existed,
including the pro democracy New Democratic Macau
Society, headed by a legislator. Civic associations
and candidates' committees may present candidates for
geographic and functional constituencies (see Section
3). Article 23 of the Basic Law obliges the SAR to
enact laws to prohibit foreign political organizations
from establishing ties with domestic political
organizations or bodies. At year's end, the Government
had not enacted such legislation.
Falun Gong practitioners were allowed to continue
their exercises and demonstrations in public parks.
c. Freedom of Religion
The Basic Law provides for freedom of conscience and
religious belief as well as freedom to preach and to
conduct and participate in religious activities, and
the Government generally respected these rights in
practice. The Freedom of Religion Ordinance provides
for freedom of religion, privacy of religious belief,
freedom of religious assembly, freedom to hold
religious processions, and freedom of religious
education. There is no state religion.
For a more detailed discussion, see the 2004
International Religious Freedom Report.
d. Freedom of Movement Within the Country, Foreign
Travel, Emigration, and Repatriation
The law provides for these rights, and the Government
generally respected them in practice. Approximately
100,000 residents held Portuguese European Union
passports, and an increasing number held SAR passports
that allowed visa-free entry to many countries,
including EU member states. Most residents also held
special permits that allowed travel to and from the
mainland. There was a separate pass for travel to and
from Hong Kong.
The law provides for the granting of asylum or refugee
status in accordance with the 1951 U.N. Convention
Relating to the Status of Refugees or its 1967
Protocol. In practice, the Government granted refugee
status or asylum and provided protection against
refoulement, the return of persons to a country where
they feared prosecution. The Migration Department
cooperated with the U.N. High Commissioner for
Refugees in handling refugees. As of November, there
were no refugee cases.
In 2002, the SAR enacted the Internal Security Legal
Framework, which allows the Government to refuse entry
or expel any nonresident considered inadmissible or
constituting a threat to internal security, or
suspected of having a relationship with transnational
crime or terrorism. During the year, no person was
refused entry based on suspicion of having a
connection to terrorism; 131 persons were refused
entry based on suspicion of having a relationship with
transnational crime; and 4,465 persons were refused
entry for internal security reasons, primarily for
violations of immigration law.
During the year, 317 illegal migrants and 4,660
overstayers were returned to the mainland.
The Basic Law prohibits forced exile by guaranteeing
the right of permanent residents to leave and enter
the SAR, and the Government respected the law.
Section 3 Respect for Political Rights: The Right of
Citizens to Change Their Government
The Basic Law restricts citizens' ability to change
their government. The Government is led by a chief
executive, chosen by a 300-member election committee,
which in turn is chosen by a 100-member preparatory
committee, composed of 60 SAR and 40 mainland
representatives appointed by the NPC.
An election law enacted in April expanded the number
of election committee members from 200 to 300, but it
did not otherwise move the SAR closer to universal
suffrage. A pro-democracy legislator refused a seat on
the election committee after his efforts failed to
widen further its membership.
In August, Chief Executive Edmund Ho was re-elected to
a second 5-year term with 296 of the 300 election
committee votes.
The Legislative Assembly, elected in 2001, is composed
of 27 members: 10 elected directly from geographical
constituencies; 10 elected indirectly by local
community interests such as business, labor,
professional, welfare, cultural, educational, and
sports associations; and 7 appointed by the Chief
Executive. Legislative elections are held every 4
years, and the Basic Law stipulates that the number of
legislators is to increase gradually in subsequent
elections. After 2009, the rules regarding the
Assembly's composition may be altered by a two thirds
majority of the total membership and with the approval
of the Chief Executive, who has veto power. The Basic
Law does not provide for universal suffrage or for
direct election of either the legislature or the Chief
Executive.
There are limits on the types of legislation that
legislators may introduce. The Basic Law stipulates
that legislators may not initiate legislation related
to public expenditure, the SAR's political structure,
or the operation of the Government. Bills relating to
government policies must receive the Chief Executive's
written approval before they are submitted.
A 10-member Executive Council functions as an
unofficial cabinet, approving all draft legislation
before it is presented in the Legislative Assembly.
In 2000, the legislature passed a law reconstituting
the pre handover High Commission Against Corruption as
the Commission Against Corruption (CAC). The CAC
investigates public-sector corruption and has the
power to arrest and detain suspects. From January to
October, the CAC received 804 complaints against
public officials in a variety of agencies. The CAC
opened 68 files, of which 67 were criminal cases and 1
was an administrative grievance. The CAC transferred
eight cases to the Public Prosecutions Office. A
monitoring body established to review complaints of
maladministration or abuse by the CAC received no
complaints from January through October.
The executive branch published online, in both Chinese
and Portuguese, an extensive amount of information
including laws, regulations, ordinances, government
policies and procedures, and biographies of government
officials. The Government also issued a daily press
release on topics of public concern. However, the
information provided by the legislature was less
extensive. For example, it did not publish a
legislative agenda or a list of pending bills.
Five of the 27 Legislative Assembly members (3
directly elected, 1 indirectly elected, and 1
appointed), including the President of the Assembly,
were women. Women held a number of senior positions
throughout the Government (see Section 5).
Section 4 Governmental Attitude Regarding
International and Nongovernmental Investigation of
Alleged Violations of Human Rights
Domestic human rights groups functioned without
government restriction, investigating and publishing
their findings on human rights. Local human rights
groups, such as the Macau Association for the Rights
of Laborers and the New Democratic Macau Association,
continued to operate.
Section 5 Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and
Trafficking in Persons
The Basic Law stipulates that residents shall be free
from discrimination, irrespective of their
nationality, descent, race, sex, language, religion,
political persuasion, ideological belief, educational
level, economic status, or social condition, and the
Government effectively enforced the law. In addition,
many local laws carry specific prohibitions against
discrimination. For example, under the law that
establishes the general framework for the educational
system, access to education is stipulated for all
residents regardless of race, religious belief, or
political or ideological convictions.
Women
The Government effectively enforced criminal statutes
prohibiting domestic violence and prosecuted
violators. Domestic violence is punishable by 1 to 15
years in prison. In the case of spousal abuse and
violence against minors, the penalty is 2 to 8 years'
imprisonment, and 5 to 15 years if the abuse leads to
the death of the victim.
The Government provided hospital treatment for victims
of abuse, and medical social workers counseled victims
and informed them about social welfare services. The
Government may provide victims of domestic violence
with public housing until their complaints are
resolved, but it did not reserve facilities expressly
for this purpose.
Private and religious groups sponsored programs for
victims of domestic violence, and the Government
supported and helped to fund these organizations and
programs. The Bureau for Family Action, a government
organization subordinate to the Department of Family
and Community of the Social Welfare Institute, helped
female victims of domestic violence by providing a
safe place for them and their children and furnishing
advice regarding legal actions against the
perpetrators. A family counseling service was
available to persons who requested such services at
social centers. Two government-supported religious
programs also offered rehabilitation programs for
female victims of violence. From January to October,
13 cases of spousal abuse and 10 cases of family
violence were reported to the Social Welfare
Institute. The law on rape covers spousal rape. From
January to October, there were 13 reported rapes.
Prostitution is legal, but procuring is not.
Trafficking in persons also is illegal, and there were
cases of trafficking in women for the purposes of
prostitution (see Section 5, Trafficking).
There is no law specifically addressing sexual
harassment, although there is a law prohibiting
harassment in general.
Equal opportunity legislation applicable to all public
and private organizations mandates that women receive
equal pay for equal work, prohibits discrimination
based on sex or physical ability, and establishes
penalties for employers who violate these guidelines.
The law allows for civil suits, but few women took
their cases to the Labor Affairs Bureau or other
entities. There were no cases alleging sexual
discrimination during the year.
Women held a number of senior positions in the
Government. The Chairperson of the Legislative
Assembly, the Secretary for Justice and Administration
on the Executive Council, and the Commissioner for
Audit were women. In September, 7 women were among 10
newly appointed judges and public prosecutors. Women
also have become more active and visible in business.
However, wage discrimination occurred in certain
sectors of the job market, notably construction.
Children
The Government protected the rights and welfare of
children through the general framework of civil and
political rights legislation that protects all
citizens. For example, the Criminal Code provides for
criminal punishment for sexual abuse of children and
students, statutory rape, and procuring that involves
minors.
School attendance is compulsory for all children
between ages 5 and 15. Basic education was provided in
government-run schools and subsidized private schools,
and it covered the preprimary year, primary education,
and general secondary school education. The Education
Department provided assistance to families that could
not pay school fees. The children of illegal
immigrants were excluded from the educational system.
Experts believed that only a few children were
affected by this exclusion. The Government provided
free medical care for all children. Child abuse and
exploitation were not widespread problems. From
January to October, seven cases of child abuse were
reported to the Social Welfare Institute. During the
same period, 120 cases of offenses against the
physical integrity of minors, including 10 cases of
family violence, were reported to the Office for
Security Coordination. From January to October, the
Government received two reports of rape of minors and
five reports of sexual abuse of minors.
Trafficking in Persons
The Law on Organized Crime makes trafficking in
persons a crime punishable by 2 to 8 years in prison,
and the Government effectively enforced the law. The
law increases this penalty by one-third (within
minimum and maximum limits) if the victim is under 18
years of age. If the victim is under 14 years of age,
the penalty is increased by 5 to 15 years. If the
trafficker rapes the victim, the two offenses are
treated as different crimes.
Prostitution is not a crime, but living off the
proceeds of prostitution is illegal. Prostitutes
primarily were from Russia, mainland China, and
Vietnam. While most were believed to be witting
participants in the commercial sex industry, 17 women
complained of being brought to the SAR under false
pretenses and 5 complaints of abuse.
There were no government assistance programs in place
for victims of trafficking. There were no local NGOs
specifically dealing with the problem of trafficking;
however, there were charitable organizations that
provided assistance and shelter to women and children
who were the victims of abuse.
Persons with Disabilities
There were no reports of discrimination against
persons with disabilities in employment, education, or
provision of state services. The law mandates access
to buildings for persons with disabilities, and the
Government generally enforced these provisions in
practice.
The Social Welfare Institute provided financial and
rehabilitation assistance to persons with
disabilities, and it helped fund 24 rehabilitation
facilities and 11 rehabilitation associations. These
services included day centers, preschool training and
education centers, vocational training and employment
centers, and rehabilitation bus service. Other special
programs helped persons with physical and mental
disabilities gain better access to employment,
education, and public facilities. For facilities that
received financial support, approximately 80 percent
of their income came from the Government. In 2003, the
Government provided approximately $3.3 million (25.4
million patacas) in subsidies to such facilities and
programs. During the year, 37 NGOs provided services
for persons with disabilities and received regular
assistance from the Social Welfare Institute and
subsidies from other governmental departments. During
the 2003-04 school year, 14 schools had programs for
persons with disabilities and provided special
education programs for 724 students with disabilities.
The law mandates accessibility for persons with
reduced mobility to public administration buildings,
buildings open to the public, collective dwellings,
and pavements. The Government's Social Security fund
may grant subsidies for the elimination of
architectural barriers to facilitate access by persons
with a physical or behavioral disability. Many
sidewalks and public buildings have been modified to
comply with the law.
National/Racial/Ethnic Minorities
Although no specific laws prohibit discrimination on
the basis of racial or ethnic background, the
Government generally respected the rights of ethnic
minorities, particularly the Macanese (Eurasians who
comprise approximately 2 percent of the population).
Although Portuguese officials no longer dominated the
civil service, the government bureaucracy and the
legal system placed a premium on knowledge of the
Portuguese language, which was spoken by approximately
2 percent of the population. The Chinese language has
official status and the use of Chinese in the civil
service has grown in recent years.
Section 6 Worker Rights
a. The Right of Association
The law provides for the right of workers to form and
join unions of their choice without previous
authorization or excessive requirement, and the
Government generally respected this right in practice.
The Basic Law stipulates that international labor
conventions that applied before the handover are to
remain in force and are implemented through the laws
of the SAR. The UDDM has expressed concern that local
law contains no explicit provisions that bar
discrimination against unions. The law also
specifically excludes public servants and migrant
workers from labor law protections.
Nearly all private sector unions were part of the pro
China Federation of Trade Unions (FTU), and they
tended to stress the importance of stability and
minimum disruption of the work force. The UDDM and
some local journalists claimed that the FTU was more
interested in providing social and recreational
services than in addressing trade union issues such as
wages, benefits, and working conditions. At year's
end, there were 173 registered independent trade
unions, including 3 new unions that registered during
the year. All classes of workers have the right to
join a union. At year's end, approximately 79 percent
of public sector employees were members of a union.
There was no data on private sector unionization.
b. The Right to Organize and Bargain Collectively
The law provides that agreements concluded between
employers and workers shall be valid, but there is no
specific statutory protection that provides for the
right to collective bargaining; however, the
Government did not impede or discourage collective
bargaining. Market forces determined wages. Unions
tended to resemble local traditional neighborhood
associations, promoting social and cultural activities
rather than workplace issues. Local customs normally
favored employment without the benefit of written
labor contracts, except in the case of migrant labor
from the mainland and the Philippines. Pro-PRC unions
traditionally have not attempted to engage in
collective bargaining.
There is no specific protection in local law from
retribution if workers exercise their right to strike.
The Government has argued that striking employees are
protected from retaliation by labor law provisions
that require an employer to have "justified cause" to
dismiss an employee, and the Government generally
enforced these provisions. Strikes, rallies, and
demonstrations are not permitted in the vicinity of
the Chief Executive's office, the Legislative
Assembly, and other key government buildings. There
were no reports of labor protests, strikes, or work
stoppages during the year.
Workers who believe that they have been dismissed
unlawfully may bring a case to court or lodge a
complaint with the Labor Department or the High
Commissioner against Corruption and Administrative
Illegality, who also functions as an ombudsman.
There are no export processing zones.
c. Prohibition of Forced or Compulsory Labor
The law prohibits forced or compulsory labor,
including by children, and there were no reports that
such practices occurred.
d. Prohibition of Child Labor and Minimum Age for
Employment
The law prohibits minors under the age of 16 from
working, although minors between the ages of 14 and 16
can be authorized to work on an "exceptional basis."
Some children reportedly worked in family-run
businesses and on fishing vessels, usually during
summer and winter vacations. Local laws do not
establish specific regulations governing the number of
hours these children can work, but International Labor
Organization conventions are applied. The Labor
Department enforced the law through periodic and
targeted inspections, and violators were prosecuted.
The Labor Department Inspectorate did not conduct
inspections specifically aimed at enforcing child
labor laws, but it would issue summonses when such
violations were discovered in the course of other
workplace inspections. No violations of child labor
laws were reported during the year.
e. Acceptable Conditions of Work
Local labor laws establish the general principle of
fair wages and mandate compliance with wage
agreements, but there is no mandatory minimum wage.
Average wages provided a decent standard of living for
a worker and family. There were no publicly
administered social security programs, but some large
companies provided private welfare and security
packages.
Labor legislation provides for a 48-hour workweek, an
8-hour workday, paid overtime, annual leave, and
medical and maternity care. Although the law provides
for a 24-hour rest period for every 7 days of work,
workers frequently agreed to work overtime to
compensate for low wages. The Labor Department
provided assistance and legal advice to workers on
request.
The Labor Department enforced occupational safety and
health regulations, and failure to correct infractions
could lead to prosecution. During the year, the Labor
Department inspectorate conducted 1,835 inspections
and uncovered 2,761 violations carrying fines worth
$191,000 (1.479 million patacas). There were two work
related deaths during the first half of the year.
Although the law includes a requirement that employers
provide a safe working environment, no explicit
provisions protect employees' right to continued
employment if they refuse to work under dangerous
conditions.
Migrant workers, primarily from the PRC, made up
approximately 9 percent of the work force. They often
received less than local residents for performing the
same job, lived in controlled dormitories, worked 10
to 12 hours per day, and owed large sums of money to
labor-importing companies for purchasing their jobs.
They had no collective bargaining rights and no legal
recourse in the case of unfair dismissal.
|